“Performance of elecsys anti- Sars Cov-2 (ROCHE) and vidas anti Sars Cov-2 (BIOMÉRIEUX) for Sars Cov-2 Nucleocapsid and spike protein antibody detection"

Authors

  • J Alfaro Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Clínica Universitaria Reina Fabiola, Servicio de Microbiología, Laboratorio de Virología
  • MI Riberi Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Clínica Universitaria Reina Fabiola, Servicio de Microbiología, Laboratorio de Virología
  • MG Hernandez Toledo Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Clínica Universitaria Reina Fabiola, Servicio de Microbiología, Laboratorio de Virología
  • MP Cid Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Departamento de Química
  • MM Tenaglia Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Clínica Universitaria Reina Fabiola, Servicio de Microbiología, Laboratorio de Virología;
  • BS Konigheim Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Instituto de Virología “Dr.J.M.Vanella"
  • JJ Aguilar Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Instituto de Virología “Dr.J.M.Vanella"
  • S Blanco Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Instituto de Virología “Dr.J.M.Vanella”

Keywords:

performance, diagnosis, antibody detection

Abstract

Abstract: 

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the novel viral pathogen that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in humans, has spread worldwide since its identification in late 2019. The pandemic produced an accelerated development of new serological techniques for diagnosis.

Herein, we evaluated two commercial assays for serological diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Elecsys Anti-SARS CoV-2 (Roche), for nucleocapsid total antibody detection and VIDAS Anti- SARS CoV-2 (bioMérieux), for spike protein IgG antibody detection.

The Elecsys Anti-SARS CoV-2 assay was performed on a Cobas e411 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics) and conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Results are expressed as (cut-off index, negative COI <1 or positive COI ≥1) for anti-SARS CoV-2 total antibodies. The VIDAS SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay was performed on a VIDAS analyzer (bioMérieux) and conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Results are interpreted as negative (index <1) or positive (index ≥1). Sensitivity was assessed using a panel of 92 plasma samples from recovered COVID-19 patients who were positive for RT-PCR and positive for neutralizing antibodies by PRNT and/or positive for IgG antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Specificity was determined studying 71 plasma samples collected during year 2018, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test (CI 95%). Additionally, concordance between the two commercial assays was analyzed using Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ).

Sensitivity: 97.83% and 98.91% for Roche and bioMérieux assays, respectively, specificity: 98.59% (Roche) and 97.18% (bioMérieux), positive predictive value (PPV): 98.90% (Roche) and 97.85% (bioMérieux), and negative predictive value: (NPV) 97.22% (Roche) and 98.57% (bioMérieux). Additionally, Cohen's kappa coefficient demonstrated high concordance (k=0.950) between Elecsys Anti-SARS CoV-2 and VIDAS Anti-SARS CoV-2.

In conclusion, these results evidenced a very good performance for both, the nucleocapsid antibody assay (Elecsys Anti-SARS CoV-2; Roche) and the spike protein antibody assay (VIDAS Anti-SARS CoV-2; bioMérieux), being both platforms equally adequate for indirect diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection through total antibodies and IgG antibody detection, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

.

Published

2021-10-12

Issue

Section

Investigación en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (Resúmenes JIC)

How to Cite

1.
Alfaro J, Riberi M, Hernandez Toledo M, Cid M, Tenaglia M, Konigheim B, et al. “Performance of elecsys anti- Sars Cov-2 (ROCHE) and vidas anti Sars Cov-2 (BIOMÉRIEUX) for Sars Cov-2 Nucleocapsid and spike protein antibody detection". Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba [Internet]. 2021 Oct. 12 [cited 2024 Nov. 12];78(Suplemento). Available from: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/35069

Similar Articles

31-40 of 615

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>