Variabilidad y discrepancias entre Comités de Ética en la evaluación de proyectos de investigación académica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31053/1853.0605.v80.n2.39412Palabras clave:
comités de ética en investigaciónResumen
.
Descargas
Referencias
1- Mariani J, Garau ML, Roitman AJ, Vukotich C, Perelis L, Ferrero F, Domínguez AG, Campos C, Serrano C, Villa Monte GG. Variability in Ethics Review for Multicenter Protocols in Buenos Aires, Argentina. An Observational Study. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Oct 25:15562646221134620. doi: 10.1177/15562646221134620.
2- Miller CW, Greenawalt JA, Kardong-Edgren SS, Oermann MH, Molloy M, Mudra V, Rogers N, Mondragon L, Cespedes A, Frost E, Causey R, Webb S, Muñana A, Chen A. Planning and managing a complex multisite study in the age of technology. Nurs Forum. 2019 Oct;54(4):707-713. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12401.
3- Diamond MP, Eisenberg E, Huang H, Coutifaris C, Legro RS, Hansen KR, Steiner AZ, Cedars M, Barnhart K, Ziolek T, Thomas TR, Maurer K, Krawetz SA, Wild RA, Trussell JC, Santoro N, Zhang H; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. The efficiency of single institutional review board review in National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network-initiated clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2019 Feb;16(1):3-10. doi: 10.1177/1740774518807888.
4- Page SA, Nyeboer J. Improving the process of research ethics review. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017 Aug 18;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0038-7.
5- Tsang TS, Jones M, Meneilly GS. Analysis of research ethics board approval times in an academic department of medicine. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Apr;10(2):145-50. doi: 10.1177/1556264615571557.
6- Needham AC, Kapadia MZ, Offringa M. Ethics review of pediatric multi-center drug trials. Paediatr Drugs. 2015 Feb;17(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s40272-014-0098-9.
7- Hyder AA, Pratt B, Ali J, Kass N, Sewankambo N. The ethics of health systems research in low- and middle-income countries: a call to action. Glob Public Health. 2014;9(9):1008-22. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.931998.
8- Williams-Jones B, Potvin MJ, Mathieu G, Smith E. Barriers to research on research ethics review and conflicts of interest. IRB. 2013 Sep-Oct;35(5):14-9.
9- Marsolo K. Approaches to facilitate institutional review board approval of multicenter research studies. Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S77-81. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825a76eb.
10- Schmelzer M, Daniels G, Dudley-Brown S, Foote K, Hayes A, Nardelli N. Multisite research: a spirit of cooperation. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2011 Jul-Aug;34(4):327-30. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e318227cbd9.
11- Cacchione PZ. When is institutional review board approval necessary for quality improvement projects? Clin Nurs Res. 2011 Feb;20(1):3-6. doi: 10.1177/1054773810395692.
12- Wright K. Need for clinical research in children and young people. BMJ. 2015 Dec 23;351:h6902. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6902.
13- Baxter K, Krokosky A, Terry SF. Risky business: the need for hypothesis-generating research. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2011 Sep;15(9):577-8. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2011.1523.
14- Weil LG, Lemer C, Webb E, Hargreaves DS. The voices of children and young people in health: where are we now? Arch Dis Child. 2015 Oct;100(10):915-7. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307492.
15- Cuestas E. Estrategias para la formación y desarrollo de equipos de investigación exitosos [Strategies for training and development of successful research teams]. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2011 Apr;109(2):100-2. Spanish. doi: 10.1590/S0325-00752011000200002.
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Se permite la generación de obras derivadas siempre que no se haga con fines comerciales. Tampoco se puede utilizar la obra original con fines comerciales.
Cómo citar
