Intrapartum epidural catheter displacement: Comparison of three dressing methods (Migración de catéter epidural intraparto: Comparación de tres métodos de fijación)

Authors

  • Efrain Riveros Perez Augusta University
  • Katie Barnett Augusta University
  • Enoe Jimenez Augusta University
  • Nianlan Yang Augusta University
  • Alexander Rocuts Augusta University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31053/1853.0605.v76.n3.22726

Keywords:

epidural anesthesia, obstetric anesthesia, labor

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effect on epidural catheter migration of three different types of dressing used in labor.

Introduction: Failure of labor epidural is due to multiple factors including catheter migration. Epidural catheter migration has been showed to be related to body mass index and patient position. The dressing technique also influences catheter migration and the risk of epidural failure.

Methods: Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups based on type of dressing of labor epidural: TegadermTM (Group T), TegadermTM with sticky pad (Group P), and TegadermTM with Steri-StripTM (Group S). Measured variables included parity, gestational age, body mass index (BMI), level of puncture and distance of epidural catheter migration.

Results: There was an overall difference in epidural catheter migration (ECM) distance among different groups (p<0.05). Pairwise comparison revealed only a significant difference between groups P and T (0.76±1.35 vs. -0.14±1.03, p<0.01).

Conclusion: Taping the lumbar epidural catheter used for labor analgesia with TegadermTM is inferior to TegadermTM with sticky pad or with Steri-StripTM in terms of catheter migration. There is no association of catheter migration and BMI.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Efrain Riveros Perez, Augusta University

    Medical Doctor. Assistant Professor. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine. Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University. Outcomes Research Consortium. Cleveland Clinic.

  • Katie Barnett, Augusta University
    Medical Doctor. Anesthesiology Resident. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine. Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University
  • Enoe Jimenez, Augusta University
    Medical Doctor. Research Assistant. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine. Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University
  • Nianlan Yang, Augusta University
    Medical Doctor. PhD. Post-Doctoral Fellow. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine. Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University
  • Alexander Rocuts, Augusta University
    Medical Doctor. Assistant Professor. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine. Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University

References

Pan PH, Bogard TD, Owen MD. Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveries. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2004 Oct; 13(4):227-33.

Burns SM, Cowa CM, Barclay PM, Wilkes RG. Intrapartum epidural catheter migration: a comparative study of three dressing applications. Br J Anaesth. 2001 Apr; 86(4):565-7.

Hermanides J, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P. Failed epidural: causes and management. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Aug; 109(2):144-54.

Hamilton CL, Riley ET, Cohen SE. Changes in the position of epidural catheters associated with patient movement. Anesthesiology. 1997 Apr; 86(4):778-84.

Hogan Q. Epidural catheter tip position and distribution of injectate evaluated by computed tomography. Anesthesiology. 1999 Apr; 90(4):964-70.

Motamed C, Farhat F, Rémérand F, Stéphanazzi J, Laplanche A, Jayr C. An analysis of postoperative epidural analgesia failure by computed tomography epidurography. Anesth Analg. 2006 Oct; 103(4):1026-32.

Phillips DC, Macdonald R. Epidural catheter migration during labour. Anaesthesia. 1987 Jun; 42(6):661-3.

Crosby ET. Epidural catheter migration during labour: a hypothesis for inadequate analgesia. Can J Anaesth. 1990 Oct; 37(7):789-93.

Shon YJ, Bae SK, Park JW, Kim IN, Huh J. Partial displacement of epidural catheter after patient position change: A case report. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb; 37:17-20.

Bishton IM, Martin PH, Vernon JM, Liu WH. Factors influencing epidural catheter migration. Anaesthesia. 1992 Jul; 47(7):610-2.

Odor PM, Bampoe S, Hayward J, Chis Ster I, Evans E. Intrapartum epidural fixation methods: a randomised controlled trial of three different epidural catheter securement devices. Anaesthesia. 2016 Mar; 71(3):298-305.

Clark MX, O'Hare K, Gorringe J, Oh T. The effect of the Lockit epidural catheter clamp on epidural migration: a controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2001 Sep; 56(9):865-70.

Hamza J, Smida M, Benhamou D, Cohen SE. Parturient’s posture during epidural puncture affects the distance from skin to epidural space. J Clin Anesth. 1995 Feb; 7(1): 1-4.

Uchino T, Miura M, Oyama Y, Matsumoto S, Shingu C, Kitano T. Lateral deviation of four types of epidural catheters from the lumbar epidural space into the intervertebral foramen. J Anesth. 2016 Aug; 30(4):583-90.

Vaughan N, Dubey VN, Wee MYK, Isaacs R. Epidural pressure measurements from various BMI obstetric patients. J Med Devices. 2014 Jul; 8(3):030938.

Published

2019-08-29

Issue

Section

Original Papers

How to Cite

1.
Riveros Perez E, Barnett K, Jimenez E, Yang N, Rocuts A. Intrapartum epidural catheter displacement: Comparison of three dressing methods (Migración de catéter epidural intraparto: Comparación de tres métodos de fijación). Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba [Internet]. 2019 Aug. 29 [cited 2024 Dec. 20];76(3):170-3. Available from: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/22726

Similar Articles

1-10 of 2018

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.