Theoretical and behavioral features to be considered when planning and implementing a PBL Curriculum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31053/1853.0605.v73.n4.12736Keywords:
Theory, Behavior, Planning, Implementation, PBL, CurriculumAbstract
This work complements former articles about an Argentinean PBL curriculum after twelve years of development. In this context, it points out determined inflexible features linked to its theoretical-pedagogical basis and certain counter-productive behaviors detected in some planners, teachers and students during its design and/or enduring implementation. Hence, reflections are made on learning and adult learning (andragogy) theories. Furthermore, related questions and some aspects to be overcome are presented and analyzed. In this way, it also intends to honestly and responsibly warn well-trained curriculum planners and executors to be cautious when choosing and managing learning theories. Likewise, it complementarily highlights the need of refocusing teachers that, pretending to be forward-looking ones, end up harming what at first proclaimed to benefit: the students
Downloads
References
1. D’Ottavio AE, Bassan ND. Reflections on remaining obstacles in a primary-care oriented pure PBL curriculum after twelve years of implementation. JPBLHE 2014; 2; 1-3
2. D’Ottavio AE. Currículos ABP: apreciaciones sobre sus bases teóricas (Carta al Editor). Acta Méd. Peruana, 2015; 32; 129-130
3. Bruner JS, Olver R, Greenfield P et al. Studies in cognitive growth. Wiley; New York, USA; 1966
4. Carretero M. Constructivismo y Educación. Editorial Paidós; Buenos Aires, Argentina; 2009
5. Skinner BF. About Behaviorism. Random House Inc; New York, USA; 1976
6. Popper G. La lógica de la investigación científica. Editorial Tecnos; Madrid, España; 1973
7. Bissonete D. Adult vs. Adolescent Learning Styles. In: http://im404504.wikidot. com /adult-vs-adolescent-learning-styles Accessed 4/11/2015
8. Cuevas Guajardo L, Rocha Romero VE, Casco Munive et al. Punto de encuentro entre constructivismo y competencias. AAPAUNAM. Academia, Ciencia y Cultura. 2011; 3: 5-8
9. De Lorenzi O, D’Andrea R, Sastre Vázquez P. Razonamiento, abstracción y validación: aportes teóricos para el análisis del lenguaje matemático en estudiantes de Ingeniería. Actas del Congreso Iberoamericano de Ciencia, Tecnología, Innovación y Educación. Buenos Aires, Argentina; 2014; 1-13
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The generation of derivative works is allowed as long as it is not done for commercial purposes. The original work may not be used for commercial purposes.