Effective interactions between academia and government agency: the participation of volunteers allowed the control of an invasive ivy in Puerto Blest, Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi (Argentina).
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v58.n1.38455Keywords:
biological invasions, conservation, exotic species removal, Hedera helix, track natural regeneration.Abstract
Background and aims: Development of management measures of invasive non-native species is priority in protected areas, particularly when actions are taken at early stages of invasion since it facilitates the recovery of natural systems. Here, we present a methodology to control an invasive evergreen vine, Hedera helix (Araliaceae).
M&M: The proposal includes volunteers, which are within a research and outreach project from Universidad Nacional Comahue Bariloche in collaboration with Administración de Parques Nacionales. We removed manually the vine with garden tools, composted it in waste plastic bags in site and kept track of natural regeneration of the native forest.
Results: Since 2019, 47 volunteers got involved and removed 870 kg of plant material (humid weight) from five of the six sites. Two of the five sites are at the stage of monitoring native species.
Conclusions: The participation of volunteers resulted effective for plant manual removal, as the vine from invasion sites is being controlled. In this way, we are achieving successful results with minimum environmental negative impacts, at least in the plant community, as evidenced by the recolonization of the sites by native plant species and by the full removal of the ivy from intervened sites. In particular, this procedure allows to create awareness of the problem of biological invasions in the community and in future university graduates. It also reinforces inter institutional relationships linking academia with conservation management agencies, a connection sometimes difficult to achieve.
Downloads
References
ADMINISTRACIÓN DE PARQUES NACIONALES. 2017. Lineamientos estratégicos para el manejo de especies exóticas en la APN. APN Documento Interno.
AL–SNAFI, A. E. 2018. Pharmacological and therapeutic activities of Hedera helix–A review. Iosr J. Pharm. 8:41–53.
BINGGELI P. 2005. Crop Protection Compendium – Hedera helix L.
BRION, C.; GRIGERA, D.; PUNTIERI, J. & CALVELO, S. 1988. Flora de Puerto Blest y sus alrededores. Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. S. C. de Bariloche. Argentina.
CLEMENTS, H. & P. BIERZYCHUDEK. 2017. Can the persistent seed bank contribute to the passive restoration of urban forest fragments after invasive species removal?. Ecol. Restorat. 35: 156–66. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.35.2.156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.35.2.156
D’ANTONIO, C. & L. A. MEYERSON. 2002. Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: A synthesis. Ecol. Restorat. 10: 703–13. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526–100X.2002.01051.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.01051.x
DÍAZ, S., J. SETTELE, E. S. BRONDÍZIO, H. T. NGO, J. AGARD, A. ARNETH, P. BALVANERA, et al. 2019. Pervasive human–driven decline of life on earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366 6471: eaax3100. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100
DIDHAM, R. K., J. M. TYLIANAKIS, M. A. HUTCHISON, R. M. EWERS, & N. J GEMMELL. 2005. Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change?. TREE 20: 470–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.006
DLUGOSCH, K. M. 2005. Understory community changes associated with english ivy invasions in Seattle’s Urban Parks. Northwest Science 79: 53–60.
ESLER, K. J., H. PROZESKY, G. P. SHARMA, & M. MCGEOCH. 2010. How wide is the ‘Knowing–Doing’ gap in invasion biology?. Biol. Invas. 12: 4065–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530–010–9812–x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9812-x
FERNÁNDEZ CÁNEPA, G. & C. I. NUÑEZ. 2017. Proyecto de manejo de plantas leñosas exóticas de carácter invasor en Puerto Blest, PNNH. Informe Interno de la Administración de Parques Nacionales. Argentina.
FOXCROFT, L. C., P. PYŠEK, D. M. RICHARDSON & P. GENOVESI. 2013. Plant Invasions in Protected Areas: Patterns, Problems and Challenges. Vol. 7. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–94–007–7750–7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7750-7
FOXCROFT, L. C., P. PYŠEK, D. M. RICHARDSON, P. GENOVESI, & S. MACFADYEN. 2017. Plant invasion science in protected areas: progress and priorities. Biol. Invas. 19: 1353–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530–016–1367–z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1367-z
FRAPPIER, B., R. T. ECKERT, & T. D. LEE. 2003. Potential impacts of the invasive exotic shrub Rhamnus frangula L. glossy buckthorn on forests of southern New Hampshire. Northeastern Naturalist 10: 277-96. https://doi.org/10.1656/1092–61942003010[0277:PIOTIE]2.0.CO;2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1656/1092-6194(2003)010[0277:PIOTIE]2.0.CO;2
GARCÍA–DÍAZ, P., L. MONTTI, P. A. POWELL, E. PHIMISTER, J. C. PIZARRO, L. FASOLA, B. LANGDON, A. PAUCHARD, E. RAFFO, J. BASTÍAS, G. DAMASCENO, A. FIDELIS, M. F. HUERTA, E. LINARDAKI, J. MOYANO, M. A. NÚÑEZ, M. I. ORTIZ, RODRÍGUEZ–JORQUERA, I. ROESLER, J. A. TOMASEVIC, D. F. R. P. BURSLEM, M. CAVA, & X. LAMBIN. 2022. Identifying priorities, targets, and actions for the long–term social and ecological management of invasive non–native species. Environ. Manage. 69: 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267–021–01541–3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01541-3
GEIGER, N., SWIM, J. K., FRASER, J. 2017. Creating a climate for change: Interventions, efficacy and public discussion about climate change. J. Environ. Psychol. 51: 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.010
GIL, F. J. T. & A. F. MOYA. 2014. Educación ambiental y biodiversidad. Jábega. 106: 60–71.
IZQUIERDO, V. M., C. I. NUÑEZ, J. SANGUINETTI, L. M. CHAUCHARD, F. MENVIELLE, & N. ZERMATTEN. 2018. Sistema de priorización de plantas exóticas –especies y poblaciones– en áreas protegidas de la Administración de Parques Nacionales [online]. Disponible en: https://sib.gob.ar/archivos/APN_sistema_priorizacion_exoticas.pdf [Acceso: 15 octubre 2022]
KORB, J. E., W. W. COVINGTON, & P. Z. FULÉ. 2003. Sampling techniques influence understory plant trajectories after restoration: an example from ponderosa pine restoration. Restorat. Ecol. 11: 504–15. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526–100X.2003.rec0170.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.rec0170.x
LEVINE, J. M., M. VILA, C. M. D. ANTONIO, J. S. DUKES, K. GRIGULIS, & S. LAVOREL. 2003. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 270: 775–81. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2327
LOOCKWOOD J. L., M. F. HOOPES, & M. P. MARCHETTI. 2013. Invasion Ecology. John Wiley & Son, West Sussex, UK, Second edition.
LUKEN, J. O., & J. W. THIERET. 1997. Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–1–4612–1926–2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1926-2
MCAFEE, D., DOUBLEDAY, Z. A., GEIGER, N., & CONNELL, S. D. 2019. Everyone loves a success story: optimism inspires conservation engagement. Bioscience 69: 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz019
MELANDER, B., I. A. RASMUSSEN, & P. BÀRBERI. 2005. Integrating physical and cultural methods of weed control—examples from European research. Weed Sci 53: 369–81. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS–04–136R DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-04-136R
MERMOZ, M., C. ÚBEDA, D. GRIGERA, C. BRION, C. MARTÍN, E. BIANCHI, & H. PLANAS. 2009. El Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi. Sus características ecológicas y estado de conservación. Administración de Parques Nacionales, Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi, San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina.
METCALFE, D. J. 2005. Hedera Helix L. J. Ecol 93: 632–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01021.x
MURAI, M. 1999. Understanding the invasion of Pacific Northwest Forests by english ivy Hedera Spp., Araliaceae. PhD Thesis, University of Washington. USA
NAZARKO, O. M., R. C. VAN ACKER, & M. H. ENTZ. 2005. Strategies and tactics for herbicide use reduction in field crops in Canada: a review. Canad. J. Pl. Sci. 85: 457–79. https://doi.org/10.4141/P04–158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/P04-158
OKERMAN, A. 2000. Combating the “ivy desert”: the invasion of Hedera helix English ivy in the Pacific Northwest United States. Restor. Reclam. Rev. 6: 1–10
PREMOLI, A., P. QUIROGA, C. SOUTO, & M. GARDNER. 2013. Fitzroya cupressoides. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T30926A2798574.
PRIOR, K. M., D. C. ADAMS, K. D. KLEPZIG, & J. HULCR. 2018. When does invasive species removal lead to ecological recovery? Implications for management success. Biol. Invas. 20: 267–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530–017–1542–x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1542-x
PYŠEK, P., P. GENOVESI, J. PERGL, A. MONACO & J. WILD. 2013. Invasion of protected areas in Europe: An old continent facing new problems. In: FOXCROFT, L. C., P. PYŠEK, D. M. RICHARDSON & P. GENOVESI (eds.). Plant Invasions in Protected Areas: Patterns, Problems and Challenges, pp. 209–40. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7750-7_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7750-7_11
SAMPLE, M., C. E. ASLAN, N. POLICELLI, R. L. SANFORD, E. NIELSEN, & M. A. NUÑEZ. 2019. Increase in nonnative understorey vegetation cover after nonnative conifer removal and passive restoration. Austral Ecol. 44: 1384–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12812 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12812
SEPÚLVEDA, M. A., A. E. J. VALENZUELA, C. POZZI, G. MEDINA–VOGEL, & C. CHEHÉBAR. 2015. Lontra Provocax. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015, e. T12305A21938042.
SIB–APN. Sistema de Información Biodiversidad [online]. Disponible en: https://sib.gob.ar [Acceso: 15 Noviembre 2022].
SOARES, M. A., LI H–Y, M. BERGEN, J. DA SILVA, K. P. KOWALSKI, & J. F. WHITE. 2016. Functional role of an endophytic Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens in enhancing growth and disease protection of invasive english ivy Hedera Helix L. Plant and Soil 405: 107–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104–015–2638–7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2638-7
SPEZIALE, K. L., M. CARRETE, J. TELLA, & S.A. LAMBERTUCCI. 2012. Dealing with alien species in South America: what makes the difference?. Biol. Invas. 14: 1609–1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530–011–0162–0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0162-0
STANLEY, K. D. & D. W. TAYLOR. 2015. Effect of manual ivy removal on seedling recruitment in Forest Park, Portland, OR. Am. J. Undergrad. Res. 12: 31–41. https://doi.org/10.33697/ajur.2015.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33697/ajur.2015.021
STOHLGREN, T. J., M. B. FALKNER, & L. D. SCHELL. 1995. A modified–Whittaker nested vegetation sampling method. Vegetatio 2: 113–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045503 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045503
VITOUSEK, P. M., C. M. D’ANTONIO, L. L. LOOPE, M. REJMANEK, & R. WESTBROOKS. 1997. Introduced species: a significant component of human–caused global change. New Zealand J Ecol 21: 1–16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24054520
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 María Paula Quiroga, Romina Vidal-Russell, Cecilia Nuñez, Gloria Fernández Cánepa, Karina Speziale
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Provides immediate and free OPEN ACCESS to its content under the principle of making research freely available to the public, which fosters a greater exchange of global knowledge, allowing authors to maintain their copyright without restrictions.
Material published in Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
