Taxonomic and functional diversity of bryophytes in different covers of a Tropical Dry Forest, Córdoba (Colombia).
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v57.n4.36922Keywords:
Bryoflora, functional traits, microclimate, substrate, water regulationAbstract
Background and Aims: Microclimatic changes resulting from the alterations in the forest structure affect the diversity of sensitive organisms such as bryophytes, the ecological processes in which they participate and their responses to new environments. In this work, the bryoflora and the functional groups associated with water regulation were characterized in different covers of a tropical dry forest: gallery forest-BG, silvopastoral system-SSP and high secondary vegetation-VSA.
M&M: There were nine transects of 0.1 ha (three/coverage) and in each one taxonomic, ecological (substrate epiphytic, epilithic, terrestrial and decomposing organic matter) and functional data (width of the caulidio, length and width of the filidio) were recorded, broad leaf base, hyalodermis and imbrication of filidios)
Results: 19 species are recorded, 15 in VSA,14 in BG and 14 in SSP. The richest families are Fissidentaceae (8 spp) and Lejeuneaceae (3 spp). The substrate with the highest incidence is epiphyte-corticola. Six functional groups were identified, differentiated by the traits: filidio length and width, hyalodermis, and filidio imbrication.
Conclusions: The richness and composition of bryophytes did not show significant differences in the evaluated coverages, possibly due to the homogenization of environmental conditions, product of the history of disturbance to which they have been subjected, therefore, it is important to evaluate other parameters (coverage) and compare with coverages vegetables in a better state of conservation. The functional groups are mainly determined by leaf size traits and are more frequent in the forest (BG and VSA).
Downloads
References
AGUIRRE, J & K. AVENDAÑO. 2008. Musgos de la región Caribe. En: RANGEL, O (ed.). Colombia diversidad biótica VI: riqueza y diversidad de los musgos y líquenes en Colombia, pp. 55-59. Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Bogotá-Colombia.
AGUIRRE, J. 2008. Diversidad y riqueza de musgos y líquenes en Colombia: generalidades y metodología. En: RANGEL, O (ed.), Colombia diversidad biótica VI: riqueza y diversidad de los musgos y líquenes en Colombia, pp. 1-17. Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Bogotá-Colombia.
ANTONELLI, A., ARIZA, M., ALABERT, J., ANDERMANN, T., AZEVEDO, J., BACON, C., ... y EDWARDS, S. V. 2018. Conceptual and empirical advances in Neotropical biodiversity research. PeerJ, 6, e5644.
https://peerj.com/articles/5644/
BALLESTEROS, J. & J, PÉREZ. 2016. Diversidad funcional: un aspecto clave en la provisión de servicios ecosistémicos. Rev colombiana Cienc Anim. 8: 94-111.
BENÍTEZ, A. 2016. Efectos de la alteración antrópica en bosques tropicales sobre la diversidad de organismos epífitos (líquenes y briófitos). Tesis doctoral. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Ecuador.
BENÍTEZ, A., G. ARAGÓN & M. PRIETO. 2015. Large trees and dense canopies: Key factors for maintaining high epiphytic diversity on trunk bases (bryophytes and lichens) in tropical montane forests. Forestry. 88: 521-527.
https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpv022
BIGGS, C. R., L. A. YEAGER., D. G. BOLSER., C. BONSELL., A. M. DICHIERA., Z. HOU & B. E. ERISMA. 2020. Does functional redundancy affect ecological stability and resilience? A review and meta‐analysis. Ecosphere, 11(7), e03184.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3184
CASANOVES, F., L. PLA & J. A. DI RIENZO. 2011. Valoración y análisis de la diversidad funcional y su relación con los servicios ecosistémicos. Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, CATIE. Turrialba, Costa Rica.
CHAO, A & L. JOST. 2012. Coverage‐based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology, 93: 2533-2547.
https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1952.1
CHAO, A., N. GOTELLI., T. HSIEH., E. SANDER., K. MA., R. COLWEL & A. ELLISON. 2014. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecological Monographs. 84: 45–67.
https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0133.1
DAUPHIN, G. 1999. Bryophytes of Cocos Island, Costa Rica: diversity, biogeography and ecology. Rev Biol Trop. 47: 309-328.
DAUPHIN, L., G. GRAYUM & H. MICHAEL. 2005. Bryophytes of the Santa Elena Peninsula and Islas Murciélago, Guanacaste, Costa Rica, with special attention to neotropical dry forest hábitats. Lankesteriana. 5: 53-61.
DAWSON, S. K., C. P. CARMONA., M. GONZÁLEZ‐SUÁREZ., M. JÖNSSON., F. CHICHORRO., M. MALLEN‐COOPER & A.B. DUTHIE. 2021. The traits of “trait ecologists”: An analysis of the use of trait and functional trait terminology. Ecology and Evolution, 11: 16434-16445.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8321
DI RIENZO, J., F. CASANOVE., M. G. BALZARINI., L. GONZALEZ., M. TABLADA & C. W. ROBLEDO. 2016. InfoStat versión estudiantil 2016. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. Recuperado de: http://www. infostat. com. ar.
DÍAZ, S & M. CABIDO. 1997. Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change. J. Veg Sci. 8: 463-474.
DÍAZ, S., D. TILMAN., J. FARGIONE., F. CHAPIN III., R. DIRZO., T. KITZBERGER., B. GEMMILL., et al. 2005. Biodiversity regulation of ecosystem services. En: HASSAN, R., R. SCHOLES & N. ASH (Eds.), Ecosystems and human well-being: Current state and trends. pp. 297-329. Island Press, Washington D.C.
DÍAZ, S., S. LAVOREL., F. DE BELLO., F. QUÉTIER., K. GRIGULIS & T. M. ROBSON. 2007. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104: 20684-20689.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.070471610
FRAHM, J., T. PÓCS., B. O'SHEA., T. KOPONEN., S. PIIPO., J. ENROTH & Y. FANG. 2003. Manual of briology tropical. Briology tropical.
GARCÍA, S. & J. MERCADO. 2017. Diversidad de briófitos en fragmentos de bosque seco tropical, Montes de María, Sucre, Colombia. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 88: 824-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2017.10.035.
GARCÍA, S., H. BASILIO., F. HERAZO., J. MERCADO & M. MORALES. 2016. Diversidad de briófitos en los Montes de María, Colosó (Sucre-Colombia). Colombia Forestal. 19: 41-52.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.colomb.for.2016.1.a03.
GIL-NOVOA, J.E., L.E. CUTA-ALARCÓN & M. E. MORALES-PUENTES. 2017. Riqueza y distribución de musgos en un bosque subandino en Bolívar-Santander, Colombia. Revista Biología Tropical, 65: 1397-1406
GLIME, J. 2017. Water Relations: Conducting Structures. En: GLIME, J (ed.). Bryophyte ecology, pp. 11-34. Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Michigan.
GOTELLI, N. J. & COLWELL, R. K. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology letters, 4: 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x
GRADSTEIN, R., S. CHURCHILL & N. SALAZAR. 2001. Guide to the bryophytes of Tropical America. The New York Botanical Garden. New York.
GRADSTEIN, S. R. & CULMSEE, H. 2010. Bryophyte diversity on tree trunks in montane forests of Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Tropical Bryology, 31: 95-105.
DOI: 10.11646/bde.31.1.16
GRADSTEIN, R & G. SPORN. 2010. Land-use change and epiphytic bryophyte diversity in the Tropics. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft. 138: 311-323.
GUERRA, G., C. ARROCHA., G. RODRÍGUEZ., J. DÉLEG & A. BENÍTEZ. (2020). Briófitos en los troncos de árboles como indicadores de la alteración en bosques montanos de Panamá. Revista de Biología Tropical, 68: 492-502.
http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v68i2.38965
HOLZ, I & R. GRADSTEIN. 2005. Cryptogamic epiphytes in primary and recovering upper montane oak forests of Costa Rica – species richness, community composition and ecology. Plant Ecology. 178: 89-109.
doi: 10.1007/s11258-004-2496-5.
HSIEH, T., K. MA & A. CHAO. 2016. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (H ill numbers). Methods in Ecology and Evolution (MEE). 7: 1451–1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12613
INSTITUTO DE HIDROLOGÍA, METEOROLOGÍA Y ESTUDIOS AMBIENTALES (IDEAM). 2010. Leyenda Nacional de Coberturas de la Tierra. Metodología CORINE Land Cover adaptada para Colombia Escala 1:100.000. IDEAM. Bogotá, D. C;
JOHANSSON, D. 1974. Ecology of vascular epiphytes in West African rain forest. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Uppsala, Suecia.
LALIBERTÉ, E., J. A. WELLS., F. DECLERCK., D. J. METCALFE., C. P. CATTERALL., C. QUEIROZ & M. MAYFILD. 2010. Land‐use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities. Ecology letters, 13: 76-86. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01403.x
LAVOREL, S., J. STORKEY., R. D. BARDGETT., F. DE BELLO., M. P. BERG., X. LE ROUX & R. HARRINGTON. (2013). A novel framework for linking functional diversity of plants with other trophic levels for the quantification of ecosystem services. Journal of Vegetation Science, 24: 942-948.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12083
MA, K. H & T. C. HSIEH TC. 2016. INEXT (Interpolación y EXTrapolación) en línea. Programa y guía del usuario. Disponible en:
http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/wordpress/software_download/.
MAGILL, R. E. 2010. Moss diversity: new look at old numbers. Phytotaxa, 9: 167-174.
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.9.1.9
MASON, N. W., & F. DE BELLO. 2013. Functional diversity: a tool for answering challenging ecological questions. Journal of Vegetation Science, 24: 777-780.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12097
MERCHÁN, J., J. HERRERA & M. DELGADO. 2011. Retención de agua en musgos de páramo de los municipios de Siachoque, Toca y Pesca (Boyacá). Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas. 5: 295-302.
http://dx.doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2011v5i2.1275.
MONTENEGRO, L., M. CHAPARRO., & A. BARÓN. 2005. Regulación hídrica en cinco musgos del páramo de Chingaza. En: Bonilla, M.A. (ed.). Estrategias adaptativas de plantas de páramo y del bosque altoandino en la cordillera Oriental de Colombia.pp. 3-24. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
MORENO C. E., J. M. CALDERÓN‐PATRÓN., N. MARTÍN‐REGALADO., A.P. MARTÍNEZ‐FALCÓN., I. J. ORTEGA‐MARTÍNEZ., D. L. RÍOS‐DÍAZ & F. ROSAS. 2018. Measuring species diversity in the tropics: a review of methodological approaches and framework for future studies. Biotropica, 50: 929-941.
https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12607
MORENO, C. E. 2019. La biodiversidad en un mundo cambiante: Fundamentos teóricos y metodológicos para su estudio. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo México. México.
PAVOINE, S. & M. B. BONSALL. 2011. Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach. Biological Reviews, 86: 792-812.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00171.x
PENNINGTON, T., M. LAVIN & F. OLIVEIRA. 2009. Woody plant diversity, evolution, and ecology in the tropics: perspectives from seasonally dry tropical forest. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 40:437-57.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120327
PILLAR, V. D., C.C. BLANCO., S.C. MÜLLER., E.E. SOSINSKI., F. JONER & L. D. DUARTE. 2013. Functional redundancy and stability in plant communities. Journal of Vegetation Science, 24: 963-974.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jvs.12047
PIZANO, C & H. GARCÍA (eds.). 2014. El bosque seco tropical en Colombia. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH). Bogotá, D.C; Colombia.
PIZANO, C., R. GONZÁLEZ., A. HERNÁNDEZ-JARAMILLO & H. GARCÍA. 2017. Agenda de investigación y monitoreo en bosques secos de Colombia (2013-2015): fortaleciendo redes de colaboración para su gestión integral en el territorio. Biodiversidad en la Práctica, 2: 87-121.
POCS, T. 2012. Tropical forest bryophytes. En Smith, A (ed.). Bryophyte ecology, pp. 52-99. New York. Springer Science & Business Media.
PROCTOR, M. C. 2000. The bryophyte paradox: tolerance of desiccation, evasion of drought. Plant Ecology, 151: 41-49.
RANGEL, O & H. ARELLANO. 2010. Clima del departamento de Córdoba. En: RANGEL, O (ed.). Colombia diversidad biótica IX: Ciénagas de Córdoba: Biodiversidad-Ecología y manejo ambiental, pp 1-13. Instituto de Ciencias Naturales. Bogotá.
RICOTTA, C., F. DE BELLO., M. MORETTI., M. M. CACCIANIGA., B. E. CERABOLINI & S. PAVOINE. 2016. Measuring the functional redundancy of biological communities: a quantitative guide. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7: 1386-1395.
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12604
ROVERE, A & G. CALABRESE. 2011. Diversidad de musgos en ambientes degradados sujetos a restauración en el Parque Nacional Lago Puelo (Chubut, Argentina). Rev chil hist nat. 84: 571-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0716-078X2011000400009
SALAVARRÍA L. E. B. 2017. Diversidad de líquenes y briófitos epífitos en bosques Amazónicos de la provincia de Orellana, con diferentes tipos de manejo. Tesis de pregrado. Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja.
SANTOS, G & J. AGUIRRE. 2010. Los musgos de la región de las Quinchas (Magdalena medio, Colombia). Caldasia. 32: 257-273.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23641933
SASTRE DE JESÚS, I. 2004. Ecología de briófitos en América Latina: De presuposiciones florísticas a la práctica ecológica. En: RANGEL, J. O., J. AGUIRRE., M. G. ANDRADE & D. GIRALDO-CAÑAS (eds.). Memorias del VIII Congreso Latinoamericano y II Colombiano de Botánica, pp: 125-133. Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia.
SCHNEIDER, C. A., W. S. RASBAND & K. W. ELICEIRI. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 años de análisis de imágenes, Nature Methods. 9: 671-675.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089.
STEEGE, H & J. CORNELISSEN. (1989). Distribution and ecology of vascular epiphytes in lowland rain forest of Guyana. Biotropica, 331-339.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2388283
SWENSON, N. G. 2011. The role of evolutionary processes in producing biodiversity patterns, and the interrelationships between taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic biodiversity. American Journal of Botany, 98: 472-480.
https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000289
URIBE, J & R, GRADSTEIN. 1999. Estado del conocimiento de la flora de hepáticas en Colombia. Rev Acad Colomb Cienc. 23: 315-318.
VIOLLE, C., M. L. NAVAS., D. VILE., E. KAZAKOY., C. FORTUNEL., I. HUMMEL & E. GARNIER. 2007. Let the concept of trait be functional!. Oikos, 116: 882-892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15559.x
WERNER, F. A., J. HOMEIER & S.R. GRADSTEIN. (2005). Diversity of vascular epiphytes on isolated remnant trees in the montane forest belt of southern Ecuador. Ecotropica, 11: 21-40.
WERNER, F & R. GRADSTEIN. 2009. Diversity of dry forest epiphytes along a gradient of human disturbance in the tropical Andes. Journal of Vegetation.
doi: 10.3170/2008-8-18466.
WOLF, J. 2003. Diversidad y ecología de comunidades epifiticas en la cordillera Central, Colombia. En: HAMMEN, T & A. SANTOS (eds.). Studies on Tropical Andean Ecosystems, pp. 455. IGAC, ICN, Universitei van Amsterdam. Bogota.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Liliana Peñate Pacheco, Joge Enrique Gil Novoa, Merly Yenedith Carillo Fajardo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Provides immediate and free OPEN ACCESS to its content under the principle of making research freely available to the public, which fosters a greater exchange of global knowledge, allowing authors to maintain their copyright without restrictions.
Material published in Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
