Morphometric study of the differentiation in Acacia bonariensis and Acacia caven var. caven (Fabaceae) in two biological reserves

Authors

  • Lucila Rajngewerc 1Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento Ecología, Genética y Evolución (EGE)- CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución (IEGEBA), Intendente Güiraldes 2160 (1428), Buenos Aires, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8808-9446
  • Cecilia Bessega 1Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento Ecología, Genética y Evolución (EGE)- CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución (IEGEBA), Intendente Güiraldes 2160 (1428), Buenos Aires, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8575-1828
  • Carolina Luciana Pometti 1Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento Ecología, Genética y Evolución (EGE)- CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución (IEGEBA), Intendente Güiraldes 2160 (1428), Buenos Aires, Argentina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0122-6338

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v56.n4.32203

Keywords:

Acacia, Aculeiferum, CDA, DAPC, Kruskal Wallis test, morphology

Abstract

Background and aims: The genus Acacia has a pantropical distribution and currently consists in approximately 1.450 species throughout the world. In Argentina the species belong to two subgenera: Acacia and Aculeiferum. In this work the morphology of two species was studied, one belonging to the first subgenus, Acacia caven var. caven and Acacia bonariensis, corresponding to the second one. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interspecific and intraspecific variation based on 12 exomorphological traits. The hypothesis was that the selected traits were able to differentiate species and populations. 

M&M: The study was based on the Kruskal Wallis test and several analyses with multivariate methods. 

Results: The Kruskal Wallis test found that nine characters were able to differentiate the species and one the populations. From the multivariate analyses the result was that, except for one character, the remaining ones were significant for the interspecific differentiation. 

Conclusions: This showed a clear separation between species according to the taxonomic classification already established. However, no differences between reserves could be evidenced for either of the species with these methods. In conclusion, these analyses set a precedent for future studies including more natural populations and the genetic study of the differentiation at molecular level.   

Author Biography

  • Carolina Luciana Pometti, 1Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento Ecología, Genética y Evolución (EGE)- CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución (IEGEBA), Intendente Güiraldes 2160 (1428), Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Investigadora adjunta en el laboratorio de genetica de especies leñosas EGE, IEGEBA, CONICET, FCEyN, UBA.

    Ayudante de primera en la materia genetica de la FCEyN, UBA

References

ARONSON, J. 1992. Evolutionary biology of Acacia caven (Leguminosae, Mimosoideae): infraspecific variation in fruit and seed characters. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 958-968. https://doi.org/10.2307/2399726

BUSTOS, E. N. 2008. Las especies urbanas de Rhopalocera de la Reserva Ecológica Costanera Sur, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea y Papilionoidea). SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología 36: 435-447.

CARPINTERO, D. L., DE BIASE, S., DAMER, L., & KONOPKO, S. A. 2016. Chinches (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) de la Reserva Ecológica Vicente López. HISTORIA NATURAL 6: 61-74.

CASTRO, E. B. 1918. Las maderas argentinas, su importancia industrial, Eduardo B. Castro.

CIALDELLA, A. M. 1984. El género Acacia (Leguminosae) en la Argentina. Darwiniana 25: 59–11.

CRISCI J. V.,& LÓPEZ ARMENGOL M. F. 1983. Introducción a la teoría y práctica de la taxonomía numérica. Secretaría general de la OEA. Washinton D.C.

EBINGER, J. E., SEIGLER, D. S., & CLARKE, H. D. 2000. Taxonomic revision of South American species of the genus Acacia subgenus Acacia (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae). Syst. Bot. 25: 588-617. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666723

GUINET, P., &VASSAL, J. 1978. Hypotheses on the differentiation of the major groups in the genus Acacia (Leguminosae). Kew Bull. 509-527.

JOMBART, T. 2008. adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403-1405. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129

JOMBART, T., DEVILLARD, S., & BALLOUX, F. 2010. Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. B. M. C. Genet. 11: 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-94

KARLIN, O. U., COIRINI, R. O., CATALAN, L., & ZAPATA, R. 1997. Acacia caven. Oficina Regional de la FAO para America Latina y el Caribe (ed). Especies arbóreas y arbustivas para las zonas áridas y semiáridas de América Latina 12, 157-167.

KRUSKAL, W. H., & WALLIS, W. A. 1952. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47: 583-621.

LANTERI, A. A., & CIGLIANO, M. M. (Eds.). 2006. Sistemática Biológica: fundamentos teóricos y ejercitaciones. UNLP. La Plata. Argentina

MBOUMBA, G. B., & WARD, D. 2008. Phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation in two extreme populations of Acacia karroo. African J. Range Forage Sci. 25: 121-130. https://doi.org/10.2989/AJRF.2008.25.3.4.601

MOORE, J. L., RUNGE, M. C., WEBBER, B. L., & WILSON, J. R. 2011. Contain or eradicate? Optimizing the management goal for Australian acacia invasions in the face of uncertainty. Diversity & Distrib. 17:1047-1059. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00809.x

ORCHARD, A. E., & MASLIN, B. R. 2005. The case for conserving Acacia with a new type. Taxon 54: 509-512. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/25065384

POMETTI, C. L. 2009. Caracterización de las variedades de Acacia caven (Leguminosae, mimosoideae) mediante el uso de marcadores moleculares y morfológicos y caracterización tecnológica de la madera de cinco especies de los géneros Prosopis y Acacia (Leguminosae, Mimosoideae). Tesis doctoral, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires.

POMETTI, C. L., CIALDELLA, A. M., VILARDI, J. C., & SAIDMAN, B. O. 2007. Morphometric analysis of varieties of Acacia caven (Leguminosae, Mimosoideae): Taxonomic inferences in the context of other Argentinean species. Pl. Syst. Evol. 264: 239-249. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00606-006-0508-8

POMETTI, C. L., VILARDI, J. C., CIALDELLA, A. M., & SAIDMAN, B. O. 2010. Genetic diversity among the six varieties of Acacia caven (Leguminosae, Mimosoideae) evaluated at the molecular and phenotypic levels. Pl. Syst. Evol. 284: 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-009-0244-y

POMETTI, C. L., BESSEGA, C. F., VILARDI, J. C., & SAIDMAN, B. O. 2012. Landscape genetic structure of natural populations of Acacia caven in Argentina. Tree Genet. Genomes 8: 911-924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-012-0479-6

POMETTI, C. L., BESSEGA, C. F., CIALDELLA, A. M., EWENS, M., SAIDMAN, B. O., & VILARDI, J. C. 2019. Evidence of local adaptation and stabilizing selection on quantitative traits in populations of the multipurpose American species Acacia aroma (Fabaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 191: 128-141. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boz023

R CORE TEAM 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Disponible en https://www.R-project.org/.

RICO-ARCE, M. D. L. 2007. American species of Acacia. Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew. 207 pp.

ROSS, J. H. 1981. An analysis of the African Acacia species: their distribution, possible origins and relationships. Bothalia 13: 389-413. https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v13i3/4.1326

RUBINSTEIN, J. 1981. Los Aromos. El Jardín y sus plantas 37: 27-29.

SEIGLER D. S., & EBINGER J. E. 2006. Mimosaceae Vachellia aroma. Phytologia 87: 143. https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei

SEIGLER, D. S., EBINGER, J. E. & MILLER J. 2006. The genus Senegalia (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae) from the new world. Phytologia 88: 38-96. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.17845

SMITH G. F., Van WYK A. E., LUCKOW M., & SCHRIRE B. 2006. Conserving Acacia Mill. with a conserved type. What happened in Vienna? Taxon 55: 223–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.605033

SNEATH P. H. A., & SOKAL R. R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. The Principles And Practice Of Numerical Classification. Freeman, San Francisco.

SOKAL R. R. 1986. Phenetic taxonomy. Freeman y co., San Francisco.

STATSOFT INC., 2004. “Statistica,” Data Analysis Software System, version 7.

TORTORELLI, L. 1956. Maderas y bosques argentinos. ACME. Buenos Aires.

Van RIJCKEVORSEL, P. 2006. Acacia: What did happen at Vienna?. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 61: 107-110. https://doi.org/10.3989/ajbm

WERTHEIMER, M. C. 2018. Renovación urbana y conflictos territoriales en las costas metropolitanas del Río de la Plata: los casos de Quilmes, Avellaneda y Vicente López. Estudios del Hábitat 16: e049.

Published

2021-12-22

Issue

Section

Genetics & Evolution

How to Cite

“Morphometric Study of the Differentiation in Acacia Bonariensis and Acacia Caven Var. Caven (Fabaceae) in Two Biological Reserves”. 2021. Boletín De La Sociedad Argentina De Botánica (Journal of the Argentine Botanical Society 56 (4). https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.v56.n4.32203.

Similar Articles

31-40 of 562

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.