Cáncer de Mama: alcances actuales y vigencia de la exploración estadificatoria extrapleural de la cadena mamaria interna

René A Del Castillo; Néstor C Garello; Emilio Kuschnir; Ricardo Castro

doi:10.31053/1853.0605.v62.n2.27897

Authors

René A Del Castillo
Néstor C Garello
Emilio Kuschnir
Ricardo Castro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31053/1853.0605.v62.n2.27897

Keywords:

.

Abstract

The interest to know the lnternal Marnmary Chain (IMC) Involvement is that it is a lyrnphatic filter as primary as the axilla. Anatomic-surgical fundamcnts, were presented for thcir exploration .Fifty (50) pectus-sternal, analizing the number of nodes (average 9,7 per pecirnen), located preferably in the three first intercostals spaces, were studied. In the second phase IMC with a staging criterion and extrapleural way, resecting 1 or 2 costal cartilages, were explored. In 78 patients, pathological-anatomy correlation between IMC and the axilla, we observed 6% positive IMC with negative axilla. More recently in the era of the sentinel node, we have explored IMC in 44 patients through intercostal spaces and without cartilages resection. lo 28 patients we performed through radioisotopic way and gamma probe and in the remaining 16, through anatomic search !f the tumor was either upper mid or lower. The most frequent spaces explored were in the 2- and 3: 2.27 nodes average per patient. The pathological-anatomy between IMC and the axilla revealed the foliowing results: axilla (-) IM (-): 59%; axilla (+) MI (-): 25%; axilla (+) IM (+): 11% and axilla (-)IM (+): 5%. Wc concluded that this is a non - aggressivc method, with an exccllent tolerance that aliows the evaluation of another filter as primary as the axilla aoci that together they represent the hest systemic disease prognostics. We believe that its exploration is justified in those cases in which the histological result , correlated with the axilla, aliows a therapeutic approach change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Byrd DR, Dunnwald LK, Mankoff DA, et al. Internal rnamrnary lymph node drainage patients with breast cancer documented by breast lymphoscintigraphy. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8:234-240.

Turner J and Warwich R. Lymphatic of the breast. Brist. J. Surg 1959; 46: 574- 82.

Johnson N, Soot L, Nelson J, Franzini D. et al. Sentinel Node biopsy and internal rnarnrnary lymphatic rnapping in breast cancer. Ami Surg 2000; 179: 386- 388.

Noblia C. Cresta Morgado C y col. Resumen de presentación oral VII Congreso Argentino de Mastologia y IV Congreso de Mastologia del Mercosur. Bs As. 24,25 y 26 de agosto 2003

Loza y col, Libro Resumen del Curso Internacional Carcinoma de mama en la era del Ganglio Centinela. Córdoba (Arg) 3-4 de octubre 2003.

Cody III HS, lirban JA. Internal mammary node status: a major prognosticator in axillary node-negative breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1995; 2(1): 32-7.

Sugg SL, Ferguson D, Posner M, Heimann R. Should internal mamrnary nodes be sampleci in the sentinel lymph node era?. Ann of surg oncol 2000; 7(3): 188-192.

Galimberti y, Veronesi e Amone P et al: Stage migration after biopsy of internal marnmary chain lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002; 9(9): 924-928.

Sacchini V, Borgen P. Galimberti y, Veronesi P Cody III HS, Veronesi U, et al. Surgical approach to internal rnammary lymph node biopsy. 3 Am Coll Surg 2001; 193(6): 709-713.

Del Castillo R. La Cadena ganglionar mamaria interna y su exploración diagnóstica en el carcinoma mamario. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Nac. De Córdoba. 1970.

Urban J. Radical mastectomy withen bloc in continuity resection of the internal mammary lymph nocle chain. Surg Clin North Am 1956; 36:1056-1082.

Del Castillo R, Kuschnir E, Figueras S. Ferreyra R. Lymphscintigraphies of the internal niarnmary ganglionar Chain: our experience. Eur J Gynecol Oncol 1986, 7(2): 82-87.

Uren R, Howman-Giles R, Thompson 3, Malouf D. Ramsey-Stewart O, Niesche F and Renwich S. Sentinel lymph nade biopsy in breast cancer is lymphosci Ntigraphy really necessary? JNuciMed 1995; 36:1775-1780.

Borgstein Pi, Pijpers R, Comans EF, van Diest Pi, Boom RP, Meijer S. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer :guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma prohe detection. 3Am Coil Surg 1998; 186:275- 283.

Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T. et al. The sentinel nade in breast cancer-a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med 1998; 339.941-6.

Jansen L y cois. Clinical revelance of sentinel lymph nades outside the axial in patients with breast cancer. Br. J Surg 2000; 87:920-4.

Noguchi M. Tsugawa K, Miwa K. Internal mamrnary chain sentinel lymph node identification in breast cancer. J. Surg. Oncol 2000; 73: 75-80

Van der Ent FW, Kengen R, van der P01 HA, Poye! JA, et al. Haisted revisited: internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Ann Surg 2001: 234(1): 19-84.

Nieweg QE, Bartelink H. Implications of lyxnphatic mapping for staging and adj uvant treatrnent of patients with breast cancer. Eur J of Cancer 2004; 40: 179-181.

Uren R, Howman-Giles R. Letter to Editor. Ann of surg oncol 2001 7(10): 790.

Pagane!li O. Galiinberti y, Trifiro O, Travaini L, Veronesi U, et al. Internal mammary node lyrnphoscintigraphy and biopsy in breast cancer. Q J Nuci Mcd 2002; 46(2): 138-44.

EstourgieSH. Tanis PJ, NicwegOE, et al. Should the hunt for Internal mammary chain sentinel nodes begin? An evaluation of 150 breast cancer patients. Ann of surg oncol 2003; 10: 935-41.

Sacchini y, Borgen Fi Galimberti y, Veronesi Fi Cocly III HS, Veronesi U, et al. Surgical approach to internal mammary lymph node biopsy, J Am Col! Surg 2001; 193(6): 709-713.

Veronesi U, Paganelli JG, Viale O, Luini A, et al. A Randomized coinparison of sentinel node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engi J Mcd 2003;349:546- 53.

Ege GN, Clark RM: Internal mammary lymphocistigraphy in the conservative management of breast carcinoma: an update and reconiinendations for a new TNM staging. Clin Radiol 1985, 36: 469-72.

Osborne M, Jeyasingh R, Jewkes R and Jan Burii. The preoperative descriptiori of interna! mammary lymph node metastases in breast cancer. Br.J.Surg 1979: 66: 813-818.

San Román Terán JM y cois. Exploración de la cadena ganglionar mamaria interna. Cirugía Ibero-Americana 1992: 1(2): 134-140.

Cserni O, Pap Szekeres J. Internal mammary lymph nodes and sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. Surg Oncol 2001; 10: 25-33.

Dupont E, Cox CE; Nguyen K, Salud CJ, et al. Uti!ity of internal mammary node removal when noted by iniraoperative gamma probe detection. Ann of surg Oncol 2001; 8:833-36.

Stibhe E. The internal maminary lympliaticgland. JAnat 1918; 52: 274-82.

Falco JE, Mezzadri NA y Montesinos MR. Valor del mapeo linfático en la cirugía oncológica. Rey Arg Cir 2002: 4: 109-140.

Bevilacqua J. Gucciardo G, Cody III H, Mac Donald K, et al. A selection algorithm for interna! mam mnary sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. EJSO 2002: 28:603-614.