Usefulness of the difficult cholecystectomy score according to laparoscopic conversion

Authors

  • Santiago Pablo Carrizo Hospital Nacional de Clinicas
  • Juan Martin Magris Hospital Nacional de Clínicas
  • José Luis Da Rosa Hospital Nacional de Clínicas
  • Lucas Mariano Garcias Hospital Nacional de Clínicas
  • Luis Gramatica Hospital Nacional de Clinicas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31053/1853.0605.v77.n4.28903

Keywords:

cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, acute cholecystitis

Abstract

Introduction: Biliary lithiasis (LB) is a very frequent problem in the daily consultation of a general surgeon, so currently, 10 to 15% of the adult population in the experienced countries has LB.
Methodology: A descriptive, observational and cross-sectional study was carried out with patients sometimes having a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a period between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018. The main objective of this study is to determine the differences in the risk scoring means of difficult cholecystectomy according to the conversion to open surgery in patients diagnosed with symptomatic biliary lithiasis.
Results: Through the registered data, it can be said that being a man, with a leukocyte count> 12,000 mm3, with a BMI> 30, the presence of choledocholithiasis and a greater gallbladder cut with 3 mm are factors that increase the risk of conversion to open surgery in this series of patients. It is feasible and safe to use this score to determine the patients with the highest risk of conversion since all the independent factors identified are not modifiable.
Conclusion: In short, being a man, with a leukocyte count> 10,000 mm3, with a BMI> 30, the presence of choledocholithiasis and a gallbladder wall greater than 3 mm are factors that increase the risk of conversion to open surgery in a series of patients undergoing video laparoscopy. in a university hospital and it is feasible and safe to use this score to identify those patients with the highest risk of conversion.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Santiago Pablo Carrizo, Hospital Nacional de Clinicas

Residente de Cirugía General, Hospital Nacional de Clínicas.

Juan Martin Magris, Hospital Nacional de Clínicas

Residente de Cirugia General del Hospital Nacional de Clínicas.

José Luis Da Rosa, Hospital Nacional de Clínicas

Residente de Cirugía General del Hospital Nacional de Clínicas.

Lucas Mariano Garcias, Hospital Nacional de Clínicas

Residente de Cirugía General del Hospital Nacional de Clínicas.

Luis Gramatica, Hospital Nacional de Clinicas

Jefe de Servicio N°1 de Cirugía General del Hospital Nacional de Clínicas, Jefe del departamento de cirugía experimental del Hospital Nacional de Clínicas, Ex Jefe del Servicio de Cirugía General del Hospital Italiano de Córdoba.

References

1) Álvarez LF, Rivera D, Esmeral ME,Garcia MC, Toro DF,Rojas OL. Colecistectomía laparoscópica difícil, estrategias de manejo. Rev Colomb Cir 2013; 28: 186-95.
2) Arbues G, Bustos S. Relato Oficial. Colecistectomía dificultosa. Rev Argent Cirug 2016; 108 (Suplemento1): S7-S45.
3) Barak O, Elazary R, Appelbaum L, Rivkind A, Almogy G. Conservative Treatment for Acute Cholecystitis: Clinical and Radiographic Predictors of Failure. IMAJ 2011; 11: 25-48.
4) Boretti JJ. Relato Oficial: Colecistectomía dificultosa. XXVI Congreso Argentino y Latinoamericano de Médicos Residentes de Cirugía General. Rev Arg Res Cir 2013; 18(1): 6-36.
5) Bustos S; Prevención de la lesión quirurgica de la vía biliar; Rev Arg Res Cir, 2014; Relato Oficial.
6) Campanile FC, Pisano M, Coccolini F, Catena F, Agresta F, Ansaloni L. Acute cholecystitis: WSES position statement. World J Emerg Surg 2014, 9: 58-71.
7) Elshaer M, Gravante G, Thomas K, Sorge R, Al-Hamali S, Ebdewi H. Subtotal Cholecystectomy for “Difficult Gallbladders” Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 2015; 150(2): 159-68.
8) Gramática L, Mdalel O, Gramática L(h), Beccaría M, Mercado Luna A, Struni MF. Nuestra Experiencia en colecistitis aguda por Videolaparoscopía. Aspectos tácticos y técnicos. Rev Argent Cirug 1998; 75: 192-8.
9) Leong T, Jaewook OH. Safety and efficacy of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the morbid and super obese patients. HPB 2015; 17: 600-4.
10) Malik AM. Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Is conversion a sensible option? J Pak Med Assoc 2015; 65(7): 698-710.
11) Monestes J, Galindo F. Colecisititis aguda. Enciclopedia de Cirugía Digestiva Capítulo IV, p 441.
12) Nebiker C, Frey D, Hamel C, Oertli D, Kettelhack C. Early versus delayed cholecystectomy in patients with biliary acute pancreatitis. Surgery 2009; 145 (3): 260-4.
13) Nidoni R, Udachan TV, Sasnur P, Baloorkar R, Sindgikar V, Narasangi B. Predicting Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Based on Clinico radiological Assessment. J Clin Diagnostico Res. 2015; 9(12): PC09-PC12.
14) Pesce A, Piccolo G, La Greca G, Puleo S. Utility of fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(25): 7877-83.
15) Rosen M, Brody F, Ponsky J. Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2002; 184: 254-8.
16) Sakpal SV, Bindra SS, Chamberlain RS. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Conversion Rates Two Decades Later. JSLS 2010; 14(4): 476-83.
18) Sugrue M, Sahebally S, Ansaloni L, Zielinski MD. Grading operative findings at laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a new scoring system. World J Emerg Surg 2015; 10: 14-41.

Published

2020-12-10

How to Cite

1.
Carrizo SP, Magris JM, Da Rosa JL, Garcias LM, Gramatica L. Usefulness of the difficult cholecystectomy score according to laparoscopic conversion. Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 10 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];77(4):307-11. Available from: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/28903

Issue

Section

Original Papers