To change of life in the academy

Main Article Content

Louis Annick

Abstract

The pandemic, with the confinement it imposed, could appear at first as a suspension of time and activities in the academy. In fact, it brought a new form of storm in education and research, already affected by the series of reforms and socio-economic transformations that have taken place for twenty years. This paper proposes a reflection on these and the future perspectives of the organization of academic life.


 


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Annick , L. (2020). To change of life in the academy. Heterotopías, 3(6), 1–15. Retrieved from https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterotopias/article/view/31803
Section
Dossier
Author Biography

Louis Annick , Universidad de Franche-Comté/CRIT – CRAL (EHESS-CNRS)

Annick Louis is a professor at the University of Franche-Comté, a member of the pedagogical team of the EHESS-Paris, and a researcher at the CRAL (Centre de recherches pour les arts et le langage CNRS-EHESS). A specialist in the work of Jorge Luis Borges, her current work is oriented towards an epistemology of literature, based on a method that articulates literature with the human and social sciences. She was a Visiting Assistant Professor at Yale University in 1999-2000 and a scholarship holder at the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Germany) between 2000 and 2002.  She has translated into French Los sueños de Franciscoby Quevedo and Los sueños y el tiempoby María Zambrano. She is the author of the following books in Spanish: Borges ante el fascismo, Oxford, Peter Lang, 2007;Borges. Work and maneuvers. Santa Fe, UNL, 2014. Her latest book is L'invention de Troie. Les vies rêvées de Heinrich Schliemann, EHESS, 2020. As an editor, she has published: Josefina Ludmer, Algunos problemas de teoría literaria. Clases 1985, Buenos Aires, Paidós, 2016; Enrique Pezzoni, lector de Borges, Bs.As., Sudamericana, 1999. Compiled, edited and published by Annick Louis.

References

Arikha, N. y Origgi, G. (Dir.) (2003). Text-e. Le texte à l’heure de l’Internet. Paris: Bibliothèque Publique d’Information, Centre Georges Pompidou.

Bonnéry, S. (2007). Comprendre l'échec scolaire. Élèves en difficulté et dispositifs pédagogiques. Paris : La Dispute.

Charle, C. y Soulié, Ch. (2008). Les ravages de la « modernisation » universitaire. Paris : Syllepse.

Charle, C. (2008).L'organisation de la recherche en sciences sociales en France depuis 1945: bref bilan historique et critique.Revue d'histoire moderne contemporaine, 5 (55-4 bis), 80-97.

Chartier, R. (2006). L’écrit sur l’écran. Ordre du discours, ordre des livres et manières de lire. Entreprises et Histoire, (43), 15-25.

Chartier, R. (marzo 2003). Révolutions de l’écrit et mutations des bibliothèques.Hors-Texte. Bulletin de l’AGBD,(69), 8-16.

Chartier, R. (marzo 2009). La mort du livre?Communication & Langages, (159), 57-65.

Granovetter, M. S. (mayo 1973). The Strengh of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6), 1360-1380.

Klemperer, V. (2000). Journal 1933–1941, 1942–1945. Paris : Editions du Seuil

Klemperer, V. (1998). LTI. La langue du IIIème Reich. Paris : Albin Michel/Pocket.

Lenclud, G. (2006). L’anthropologie et sa discipline. En Boutier, J. ; Passeron, J-C yRevel, J. (Eds.),Qu’est-ce qu’une discipline ?Paris : EHESS/Enquête, 69-93.

Ludmer, J. (2010). Aquí América Latina. Una especulación.Buenos Aires: Eterna Cadencia.

Schaeffer, JM. (2011). Petite écologie des études littéraire. Pourquoi et comment étudier la littérature ? Paris : Thierry Marchaisse.