Initial assessment of attitudes towards reporting cyber-harassment in children and adolescents

Autores/as

  • Nicolás Martínez-Ramos Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá.
  • Camila Arbeláez-Gómez Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá.
  • William Martínez Universidad La Gran Colombia, Bogotá.
  • Consuelo Ramos Universidad La Gran Colombia, Bogotá.
  • Judy Benavidez Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v24.n1.45163

Palabras clave:

Colombia, cyber-harassment, psychometrics, attitudes, factor-analysis

Resumen

This study aimed to validate the initial scale of attitudes toward reporting cyber-harassment in children-adolescents among people from the Colombian general community. An instrumental study was developed, which was reached in two non-probabilistic samples (n1 = 220, n2 = 204). With the first one, a Robust Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed, finding a unidimensional 7-item solution (RMSEA = .07, SRMR = .05, CFI = .99, and TLI = .99). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis was conducted in the second sample, finding an optimal fit (RMSEA = .03, SRMR = .04, CFI = .96, TLI = .95). In both models, optimal reliability indices were obtained. The total score was crossed with socio-demographics, finding some real significant difference. Software Factor and R with different packages were used.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Ayub, S., & Malik, F. (2020). Experiences of cyber harassment and social adjustment in female university students: Moderating role of self-efficacy. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 35(3), 523-544. https://doi.org/10.33824/PJPR.2020.35.3.28

Baker, L., Campbell, M., Barreto, E., Campbell, M., & Barreto, E. (2013). Understanding technology-related violence against women: Types of violence and women’s experiences. Learning Network Brief, 6, 1-7. https://gbvlearningnetwork.ca/our-work/briefs/briefpdfs/LB-06.pdf

Barlett, C. P., Helmstetter, K., & Gentile, D. A. (2016). The development of a new cyberbullying attitude measure. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 906-913. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.013

Bégin, M. (2018). Cyberbulling. Una revisión de investigaciones internacionales sobre representaciones, prevalencias, efectos y explicaciones del fenómeno. Re-presentaciones. Periodismo. Comunicación y Sociedad, 10, 52-78. https://www.revistas.usach.cl

Beran, T. N., Rinaldi, C., Bickham, D. S., & Rich, M. (2012). Evidence for the need to support adolescents dealing with harassment and cyber-harassment: Prevalence, progression, and impact. School Psychology International, 33(5), 562-576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034312446976

Best, S., Ré, N., Corcoran, L., & McGuckin, C. (2021). Validez de contenido del Cuestionario de Ciberagresión. Revista Evaluar, 21(2), 1-16. https://revistas.unc.edu.ar

Blum, D., Auné, S., Galibert, M. S., & Attorresi, H. (2013). Criterios para la eliminación de ítems de un Test de Analogías Figurales. Summa Psicológica UST, 10(2), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.18774/448x.2013.10.140

Carter, M. A. (2013). Third party observers witnessing cyber bullying on social media sites. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1296-1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.747

Cava, M-. J., & Buelga, S. (2018). Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de Ciber-Violencia en Parejas Adolescentes (Cib-VPA). Suma Psicológica, 25(1), 51-61. http://doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2018.v25.n1.6

Cava, M-. J., Martínez-Ferrer, B., Buelga, S., & Carrascosa, L. (2020). Sexist attitudes, romantic myths, and offline dating violence as predictors of cyber dating violence perpetration in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106449

Cesario, B., Parks-Stamm, E., & Turgut, M. (2018). Initial assessment of the psychometric properties of the Sexual Harassment Reporting Attitudes Scale. Cogent Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1517629

Choja, O., & Nelson, O. (2016). Psychological Violence and the bane of Cyber-Harassment against Women: An Experiential Inquest on Facebook. Gender &Behaviour, 14(3), 7589–7608.

Comtois, D. (2022). summarytools: Tools to quickly and neatly summarize data. R package (Version 1.0.1). [Software de cómputo]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=summarytools

Cowie, H. (2013). El impacto emocional y las consecuencias del ciberacoso. Revista Digital de la Asociación CONVIVES, 3, 16-24. http://convivenciaenlaescuela.es

Cuenca-Piqueras, C., Fernández-Prados, J. S., & González-Moreno, M. J. (2020). Face-to-face versus online harassment of European women: Importance of date and place of birth. Sexuality & Culture, 24(1), 157-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09632-4

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (2007). The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition, 25(5), 582-602. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.582

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272

Feinerer, I., & Hornik, K. (2023). tm: Text Mining Package. R package (Version 0.7-11). [Software de cómputo]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tm

Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: Origins, development and future directions. Psicothema, 29(2), 236-240. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.304

Ferrando, P. J., Lorenzo-Seva, U., Hernández-Dorado, A., & Muñiz, J. (2022). Decálogo para el análisis factorial de los ítems de un test [Decalogue for the factor analysis of test items]. Psicothema, 34(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.456

Ferguson, E., & Cox, T. (1993). Exploratory factor analysis: A users’ guide. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1(2), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.1993.tb00092.x

Fletcher, T. D. (2022). psychometric: Applied psychometric theory. R package (Version 2.3). [Softwarede cómputo]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psychometric

Foley, C., May, D. C., Blevins, K. R., & Akers, J. (2015). An exploratory analysis of cyber-harassment of K-12 teachers by parents in public school settings. Educational Policy, 29(6), 879-902. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814550071

Foster, P. J., & Fullagar, C. J. (2018). Why don’t we report sexual harassment? An application of the theory of planned behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 40(3), 148-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2018.1449747

Garaigordobil, M., & Aliri, J. (2013). Ciberacoso (“cyberbullying”) en el país vasco: Diferencias de sexo en víctimas, agresores y observadores. Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 21(3), 461-474. https://www.behavioralpsycho.com

Gomes-Cavalcanti, J., de Lima-Pinto, A. V., Pimentel, C. E., & Fernandes de Melo, L. M. (2021). Psychometric parameters of the Cyberbullying Attitude Scale in Brazil. Current Psychology, 40, 3897-3907. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00326-6

Grice, J. W. (2001). Computing and evaluating factor scores. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 430-450. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.430

Halder, D., & Jaishankar, K. (2011). Cyber gender harassment and secondary victimization: A comparative analysis of the United States, the UK, and India. Victims & Offenders, 6(4), 386-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2011.607402

Hassan, F. M., Khalifa, F. N., El Desouky, E. D., Salem, M. R., & Ali, M. M. (2020). Cyber violence pattern and related factors: Online survey of females in Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 10, article number 6. http://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-020-0180-0

Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2010.494133

Hu, L-. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Izquierdo, I., Olea, J., & Abad, F. J. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies: Uses and recommendations. Psicothema, 26(3), 395-400. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.349

Jagayat, A., & Choma, B. L. (2021). Cyber-aggression towards women: Measurement and psychological predictors in gaming communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106753

Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., & Rosseel, Y. (2022). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package (Version 0.5-6). [Software de cómputo]. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=semTools

Khan, A. U., & Roshan, R. (2020). Youth and cyber harassment: Reporting mechanism of cyber harassment by the KPK universities students. The Dialogue, 15(1), 74-82. https://journals.qurtuba.edu.pk/ojs/index.php/thedialogue/about

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Korkmaz, S., Goksuluk, D., & Zararsiz, G. (2014). MVN: An R package for assessing multivariate normality. The R Journal, 6(2), 151-162. https://journal.r-project.org

Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025-2047. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9

Lee, Y. C., & Wu, W. L-. (2018). Factors in cyber bullying: The attitude-social influence-efficacy model [Factores en el acoso cibernético: El modelo de actitud-influencia social, eficacia]. Annals of Psychology/Anales de Psicología, 34(2), 324-331. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.2.295411

Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: Una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada [Exploratory ítem factor analysis: A practical guide, revised and updated.]. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 30(3), 1151-1169. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2021). MSA: The forgotten index for identifying inappropriate items before computing exploratory item factor analysis. Methodology, 17(4), 296-306. https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.7185

Lu, Y., Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Temple, J. R. (2018). Cross-sectional and temporal associations between cyber dating abuse victimization and mental health and substance use outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 65(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.02.009

Makanyeza, C. (2014). Measuring consumer attitude towards imported poultry meat products in a developing market: An assessment of reliability, validity and dimensionality of the tri-component attitude model. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(20), 874-881. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n20p874

Méndez-Martínez, C. & Rondón-Sepúlveda, M. A. (2012). Introducción al análisis factorial exploratorio [Introduction to exploratory factor analysis (EFA)]. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 41(1), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-7450(14)60077-9

Muñiz, J. (1998). La medición de lo psicológico. Psicothema, 10(1), 1-21. https://www.psicothema.com

Muñiz, J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2019). Diez pasos para la construcción de un test [Ten steps to make a test]. Psicothema, 31(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.291

Neelam, A. (2017). Law relating to cyber harassment in India. International Journal of Recent Research Aspects, 4(4), 44-46. https://www.ijrra.net

Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principle components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 9(11), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.7275/ktzq-jq66

Ostrom, T. M. (1969). The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(1), 12-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(69)90003-1

Panizo-Galence, V. (2011). El ciber-acoso con intención sexual y el child-grooming. Quadernos de Criminología: Revista de Criminología y Ciencias Forenses, 15, 22-33. https://revistaqdc.es

Pereira, F., Spitzberg, B. H., & Matos, M. (2016). Cyberharassment victimization in Portugal: Prevalence, fear and help-seeking among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 136-146. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.039

Peters, G. J. Y., & Gruijters, S. (2021). ufs: A collection of utilities. R package (Version 0.4.5.). [Software de cómputo]. https://r-packages.gitlab.io/ufs

Redondo-Pacheco, J., Luzardo-Briceño, M., Inglés-Saura, C. J., & Rivas-Rivero, E. (2018). Ciberacoso en una muestra de adolescentes de instituciones educativas de Bucaramanga. Psychologia, 12(1), 35-44. http://doi.org/10.21500/19002386.3366

RedPaPaz (2023). Viguías. https://viguias.org

Revelle, W. (2024). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research (Version 2.4.3). [Software de cómputo]. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=psych

Rincón-Rueda, A. I., & Ávila-Díaz, W. D. (2014). Simbiosis vital para describir el ciberbullying en Colombia. Revista Científica General José María Córdova 12(14), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.61

Rivadulla-López, J. C., & Rodríguez-Correa, M. (2019). Ciberacoso escolar: Experiencias y propuestas de jóvenes universitarios. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. 22(2), 179-201. http://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.2.23541

R Core Team. (2022). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R (2022). (Version 12.0) [Software de cómputo]. https://www.rstudio.com

Roebianto, A., Savitiri, S. I., Aulia, I., Suciyana, A., & Mubarokah, L. (2023). Content validity: Definition and procedure of content validation in psychological research. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 30(1), 5-18. http://doi.org/10.4473/TPM30.1.1

Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249

Rodríguez-Domínguez, C., Pérez-Moreno, P. J., & Durán, M. (2020). Cyber dating violence: A review of its research methodology [Ciberviolencia en las relaciones de pareja: Una revisión sobre su metodología de investigación]. Annals of Psychology/Anales de Psicología, 36(2), 200-209. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.370451

Rosenberg, M. J. (1956). Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53(3), 367-372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044579

Rosenberg, M. J. (1960). A structural theory of attitude dynamics. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 319-340. http://doi.org/10.1086/266951

Rotundo, M., Nguyen, D. -H., & Sackett, P. R. (2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 914-922. http://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.914

Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

Sakellari, E., Berglund, M., Santala, E., Bacatum, C. M. J., Sousa, J. E. X. F., Aarnio, H., Kubiliuté, L., Prapas, C., & Lagiou, A. (2022). The perceptions of sexual harassment among adolescents of four european countries. Children, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/children9101551

Sánchez-Díaz, L. (2019). Street harassment perception and its relations with self-objectification of women. Inter Disciplina, 7(17), 153-170. http://doi.org/10.22201/ceiich.24485705e.2019.17.67534

Skjong, R., & Wentworth, B. H. (2000). Expert judgment and risk perception. Paper presented in the Eleventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Stavanger, Norway. https://onepetro.org

Stefani, D. (2005). Teoría de la acción razonada: Una propuesta de evaluación cuali-cuantitativa de las creencias acerca de la institucionalización geriátrica. Revista Evaluar, 5(1), 22-37. http://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v5.n1.538

Suárez-Álvarez, J., Pedrosa, I., Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., Cuesta, M., & Muñiz, J. (2018). Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice. Psicothema, 30(2), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.33

Valdivieso-Taborga, C. E. (2013). Comparación de los modelos formativo, reflexivo y de antecedentes de evaluación estudiantil del servicio de docencia. Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa, 16, 95-120. https://doi.org/10.46661/revmetodoscuanteconempresa.2182

Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277-287. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014

Valentini, F. (2017). Influência e controle da aquiescência na análise fatorial. Avaliação Psicológica, 16(2), 120-251. http://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2017.1602.ed

van der Schyff, K., Flowerday, S., & Renaud, K. (2022). Socially desirable responding within the context of privacy-related research: A personality perspective. South African Journal of Information Management, 24(1), a1507. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v24i1.1507

van Laer, T. (2014). The means to justify the end: Combating cyber harassment in social media. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 85-98. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1806-z

Ventura-León, J. L. (2019). Tamaño del efecto para Kruskal-Wallis: Aportes al artículo de Domínguez-González et al. Investigación en Educación Médica, 8(30),135-136. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.riem.2017.07.002

Verplanken, B., & Orbell, S. (2022). Attitudes, habits, and behavior change. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 327-352. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-011744

Walker, C. M., Sockman, B. R., & Koehn, S. (2011). An exploratory study of cyberbullying with undergraduate university students. TechTrends, 55(2), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0481-0

Walsh, K., Rassafiani, M., Mathews, B., Farrell, A., & Butler, D. (2010). Teachers’ attitudes toward reporting child sexual abuse: Problems with existing research leading to new scale development. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 19(3), 310-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538711003781392

Wick, S. E., Nguyen, A. P., West, J. T., Nagoshi, C. T., Jordan, C., & Lehmann, P. (2020). Cyber harassment, coping, and psychological maladjustment in college students. College Student Journal, 54(1), 77-87. https://projectinnovationaustin.com/college-student-journal

Wickham, H., & Bryan, J. (2023). readxl: Read Excel Files. R package (Version 1.4.2). [Software de cómputo]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readxl

Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K., & Vaughan, D. (2023). dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package (Version 1.1.2). [Software de cómputo]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr

Willard, N. E. (2007). Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress. Research Press.

Xia, Y., & Yang, Y. (2019). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 409-428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2

Yee, M. W., Alagappar, P. N., & Ngeow, Y. M. (2015). Differences in the perception of sexual harassment by gender and ethnicity among selected Malaysian undergraduates. Gender, Technology and Development, 19(2), 204-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852415578042

Zapata-Ospina, J. P., & García-Valencia, J. (2022). Validity based on content: A challenge in health measurement scales. Journal of Health Psychology, 27(2), 481-493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320953477

Zweig, J. M., Dank, M., Yahner, J., & Lachman, P. (2013). The rate of cyber dating abuse among teens and how it relates to other forms of teen dating violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(7), 1063-1077.http://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9922-8

Descargas

Publicado

2024-05-26

Cómo citar

Martínez-Ramos, N., Arbeláez-Gómez, C., Martínez, W., Ramos, C., & Benavidez, J. (2024). Initial assessment of attitudes towards reporting cyber-harassment in children and adolescents. Revista Evaluar, 24(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v24.n1.45163

Número

Sección

Investigaciones originales