Cases "A" and "L": The analyst's position between delirium and hallucination

Abstract

This article is part of the final monographic workshop of the subject of Treatment of Psychoses and Madness of the Specialization in Clinical Psychology of Psychoanalytic Orientation at the UBA. The objective is elucidate the analysis of two cases of psychosis having as main axis the position of the analyst from the role of the secretary of the alienated. In case A, there are some setbacks on the part of the analyst, which in Freud's words could be said to be part of the trial period, in which several maneuvers were installed that allowed for the differential diagnosis and the common thread of the intervention. with the patient and his family. In case L, on the other hand, a lodging of the word is evidenced without the urgency of a diagnosis and a time to understand. Questions are needed for future clinical research work: what to do to introduce the discourse of logical times in public health that needs to say that it advocates the well-being of all.