Security of the Combined Treatment of Methotrexate and Leflunomidc in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31053/1853.0605.v64.n4.25431Abstract
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic discase leacling to functional impairrncnt and early mortality. Treatment with diseasernodifying antirheumat.ic drugs have shown to achicvc disease remission and improves its evolution. The use of combined therapy should have a biological efficacy, no increased toxicity and have an acceptable dose interval. Also, it shoulcl begin its action quickly and he cost-effective. Aims: to assess the security of the combinen treatment withMethotrexate (MTX) and Leflunomide (LF) in patients with Rheurnatoid Arthritis (RA) and to evaluate whethcr the dose and route of MTX administration influence on the toxicity. Patients and Methocls: Patients with RA who fulfihlecl ACR entena and they attencled to the Rheumatology Unit at Córdoba Hospital in the Iast 2 years were assessed. All the patients that received combined treatment with MTX in doses from 7.5 mg to 25 mg weekly orally (PO) or
intramuscularly (TM) that started LF treatment in doses of 20 mg/day due to disease activity persistericc were retrospectively assessed.
Patients having at least 6 months of combined treatment were inclucled. Data on
treatment and adverse events were collected. They were evaluated at the hegirining, at 6 and 12 months of treatment. The presence of adverse events as well as the stop of combined treatment was evaluated at 6 and 12 months 01
treatment. Adverse events in patients with oral and IM MTX treatment and in different doses were compared for the analyses. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: 62 patients with a mean age of 54 were included. 89% were female and had positive rheumatoid factor and 83% had radiological erosions. Eighty eight percent were in doses of I5mg MTX, 4.9%with lomg and 2flrngatthe
heginning of LE treatment. Twentv four percent suffered from adverse events and 33% left the medication by 6 months. Among adverse events, 6 patients had cliarrhea, 5 increased hepatic enzymes, 3 alopecia, 3 weight loss, and
2 had anemia and leucopenia. Eight patients stopped the medication in 6 months, but only 5 did because of adverse events. There was not significant statistical differcncc in adverse events hetween patients with different dose or routes of administration of MTX. Conclusions: The presence of adverse events in MTX and LF combined treatment was low and it developed dunng the first 6 months of treatment in our patients. The MTX route of administration and doses did not influence on the toxicity of the combined treatment with LF. The combined
therapy seems to be a sale treatment option in RA patients.
Downloads
References
American College of Rheumatology Suhcommittee on Rheumatoid Arthritis Guidelines. Guídelines for the managernent of rheumatoid arthritis 2002 update. Arthritis Rheum 2002:46:328-46.
O'Dell JR, I-iairc CE, Erikson N et al. Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate alone, sulfasalazine and hydroxycloroquine, or a combination of all three rnedications. N Engi J Mcd 1996;334:1287-91.
Calguneri M, Pay S, Caliskaner Z, et al. Combination therapy versus monotherapyfor the treatnient of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rhreumatol 1999:17: 699- 704.
O'Dellj, LeffR, PaulsenG, etal.Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate and hydroxycloroquine, methotrexate and sulfasalazine, or a combination of [he three mccllcations: rcsults of a two-year, randomised, double-hlind, placebo controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2002:46:1164-70.
KremerJM, Genovese MC, Cannon GW et al. Concomitan 1 leflunomide therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despitc stahle doses of methotrexate. A randomised, doubieblincl, placebo-controlled trial. Ann 1ntern Mcd. Ann Iritern Mcd 2002; 137:726-36.
Weinblatt ME. Krerner JM, Ccblyn JS el al. Pharmacokinetics, safety and efflcacy of combination treatrnent with methotrexate and leflunomide in patients with active rheurnatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1999: 42: 1322-8.
Dsiri M, Shea 13, Robison y et al. Leflunomíde for treating rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rey 2003;(1)Osiri M, Shea B, Robinson y et al.eflunomide for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systernatic rcview and mctaanalysis. J Rheumatol 2003;30:1.182-90.
Scott DL, Smolen JS, Kaiden JR et al. Treatment of active rheurnatoid arthritis with leflunomide : two year follow up of a double blind, placebo controiled trial versus sulfasalazine. European leflunomide study group. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60:913-23.
Poor G, Strand V. Efficacy and safety of leflunomide 10 mg versus 20 mg once daily in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis multinational, double biind, randomised thai. Mu Itinational study group. Rheumatology 2004; 43:744-9.
Kobelt O, Lindaren P. YourlgA. Modeliing the costs and effects of leflunomide in RA. Eur J Health Econ 2002; 3:180-7, Li EK, Tam LS, Tomiinson B. Leflunomide in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. ClinTher 2004:26: 447-59.
Cohen S, Cannon GW, Schiff M et all Two year, blind, randomised, controlled thai of treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis with leflunomide compared with methotrexate. Utilization of leflunomide in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis trial investigator group. Arthritis Rheum 2001:44:1984-92.
Maetzel A, Strand V, Tugweil P et al. Economic comparison of leflunomide and methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis : An evaluation based on 1 year randomized controlled thai. Pharrnacoeconornics 2002; 20:61-70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Faculty of Medical Sciences Journal (RFCM) subscribes to the Open Access policy and does not charge authors fees for publishing, nor does it charge readers fees for accessing published articles (APC).
