Reproducibility and realibility of a 4-day HBPM protocol with and without first day measurements

Authors

  • Jessica Barochiner Sección Hipertensión Arterial. Servicio de Clínica Médica. Hospital Italiano de Bs. As.
  • Paula E. Cuffaro Sección Hipertensión Arterial. Servicio de Clínica Médica. Hospital Italiano de Bs. As.
  • Lucas S. Aparicio Sección Hipertensión Arterial. Servicio de Clínica Médica. Hospital Italiano de Bs. As.
  • Cristina M. Elizondo Área de Investigación en Medicina. Interna, Servicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Bs. As.
  • Diego H. Giunta Área de Investigación en Medicina. Interna, Servicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Bs. As.
  • Marcelo A. Rada Sección Hipertensión Arterial. Servicio de Clínica Médica. Hospital Italiano de Bs. As.
  • Margarita S. Morales Sección Hipertensión Arterial. Servicio de Clínica Médica. Hospital Italiano de Bs. As.
  • José Alfie Sección Hipertensión Arterial. Servicio de Clínica Médica. Hospital Italiano de Bs. As.
  • Carlos R. Galarza Sección Hipertensión Arterial. Servicio de Clínica Médica. Hospital Italiano de Bs. As.
  • Gabriel D. Waisman Sección Hipertensión Arterial. Servicio de Clínica Médica. Hospital Italiano de Bs. As.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31053/1853.0605.v68.n4.21450

Keywords:

home blood pressure, reproducibility, reliability

Abstract

HBPM guidelines state that morning and evening measurements should be recorded and, to improve stability, the first day of measurements should be discarded. Our objective was to assess the reproducibility and reliability of a 4-day HBPM protocol with and without first day measurements. We analyzed a retrospective cohort of ambulatory patients who required a HBPM for diagnostic purposes or evaluation of treatment efficacy. A 4-day protocol was implemented, with daily duplicate measurements in the morning, afternoon and evening, using an OMRON 705 CP validated equipment. HBPM reproducibility was quantified by test-re-test correlations and standard deviation of differences (SDD) between BP measurements obtained during the entire 4 days, with and without exclusion of the first day. The reliability criterion was the stabilization of the mean and standard deviation (SD). We included 353 subjects with a total of 8224 BP recordings (median of 24 recordings per patient). We found a strong test-re-test correlation between days 1 to 4, which improved when we excluded the first day (p<0.001). We also found a reduction of the mean BP when we increased the number of days and a reduction of SDD when we excluded day 1. Therefore, we conclude that the exclusion of the first day of measurements improves the reproducibility and reliability of a 4-day protocol, and such two factors are not affected by the inclusion of afternoon measurements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Parati G, Mendis S, Abegunde D, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measuring devices for office/clinic use in low resource settings. Blood Press Monit 2005; 10:3-10.

Funahashi J, Ohkubo T, Fukunaga H, et al. The economic impact of the introduction of home blood pressure measurement for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. Blood Press Monit 2006; 11:257-267.

Nesbitt SD, Amerena JV, Grant E, et al. Home blood pressure as a predictor of future blood pressure stability in borderline hypertension: the Tecumseh Study. Am J Hypertens 1997; 10:1270-1280.

Mancia G, Zanchetti A, Agabiti-Rosei E, et al. SAMPLE Study Group: Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Blood Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation. Ambulatory blood pressure is superior to clinic blood pressure in predicting treatment-induced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 1997; 95:1464-1470.

Ohkubo T, Imai Y, Tsuji I et al. Home blood pressure measurement has a stronger predictive power for mortality than does screening blood pressure measurement: a population-based observation in Ohasama, Japan. J Hypertens 1998; 16:971-975.

Pickering T, Phil D, Houston Miller N, et al. Call to Action on Use and Reimbursement for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. Hypertension 2008; 52: 10-29.

Parati G, Stergiou G, Asmar R, et al. European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. Journal of Hypertension 2008; 26:1505-1530.

Stergiou G, Parati G. The optimal schedule for self-monitoring of blood pressure by patients at home. Journal of Hypertension 2007; 25:1992-1997.

Johansson J, Niiranen T, Puukka P et al. Optimal schedule for home blood pressure monitoring based on a clinical approach. Journal of Hypertension 2010, 28:259-264.

Obara T, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M et al. Prevalence of masked uncontrolled and treated white-coat hypertension defined according to the average of morning and evening home blood pressure value: from the Japan Home versus Office Measurement Evaluation Study. Blood Pressure Monitoring 2005; 10:311-316.

Marui F, Nogueira Bombig MT, Afonso Francisco Y et al. Assessment of resistant hypertension with home blood pressure monitoring. Arq Bras Cardiol 2010; 95(4):536-540.

Bayó J, Cos F, Roca C et al. Home blood pressure self-monitoring: diagnostic performance in white-coat hypertension. Blood Pressure Monitoring 2006; 11:47-52.

Verberk W, Kroon A, Kessels A et al. The optimal scheme of self blood pressure measurement as determined from ambulatory blood pressure recordings. J Hypertens 2006; 24:1541-1548.

De Gaudemaris R, Chau N, Mallion J, for the Groupe de la Mesure, French Society of Hypertension. Home blood pressure: variability, comparison with office reading and proposal for reference values. J Hypertens 1994; 12:831-838.

Stergiou G, Skeva I, Zourbaki A et al. Self monitoring of blood pressure at home: how many measurements are needed? J Hypertens 1998; 16:725-731.

Trudel X, Brisson C, Larocque B et al. Masked hypertension: different blood pressure measurement methodology and risk factors in a working population. J Hypertens 2009; 27:1560-1567.

Published

2018-09-28

How to Cite

1.
Barochiner J, Cuffaro PE, Aparicio LS, Elizondo CM, Giunta DH, Rada MA, Morales MS, Alfie J, Galarza CR, Waisman GD. Reproducibility and realibility of a 4-day HBPM protocol with and without first day measurements. Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba [Internet]. 2018 Sep. 28 [cited 2024 May 20];68(4):141-8. Available from: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/med/article/view/21450

Issue

Section

Original Papers