Dados digitais em arqueologia e comunidades indígenas: um olhar a partir de uma perspectiva colaborativa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v16.n2.41157Palavras-chave:
Dados digitais, Comunidades indígenas, Perspectiva colaborativa, GovernançaResumo
A era digital revolucionou a forma como conceituamos e gerenciamos as informações geradas por projetos de pesquisa nas Ciências Humanas. A mudança de "dados analógicos" para "dados digitais" expandiu a maneira pela qual o conhecimento armazenado em espaços virtuais de acesso aberto pode ser preservado e compartilhado. Apesar disso, os dados provenientes de muitas coleções categorizadas como arqueológicas e/ou etnográficas emergem de um contexto no qual a propriedade intelectual, os direitos autorais, a governança e a soberania cultural são obscurecidos e transferidos dos criadores originais (ou de seus herdeiros) para o pesquisador científico. Analisamos o que são dados para o sistema de ciência e tecnologia, para a arqueologia em particular e para os povos indígenas, e refletimos sobre quem tem soberania sobre eles. Aqui, propomos trabalhar a partir de uma perspectiva colaborativa centrada no diálogo com as comunidades indígenas que possibilite a negociação consensual de diferentes maneiras de fornecer acesso e facilitar a governança sobre os dados digitais da história e da cultura dos povos indígenas. Essa é uma forma de reconhecer seus direitos e de contribuir para o processo de recuperação e visibilização cultural no qual muitas comunidades indígenas estão envolvidas atualmente.
Downloads
Referências
Actis, G. y Carlino, L. (2017). Plan de Gestión de Datos en CONICET: Análisis, experiencia y desafíos. 215-231. http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/63588
Anderson, J. y Christen, K. (2013). ‘Chuck a Copyright on it’: Dilemmas of Digital Return and the Possibilities for Traditional Knowledge Licenses and Labels. Museum Anthropology Review, 7(1-2), Article 1-2.
Anderson, J. y Christen, K. (2019). Decolonizing attribution: Traditions of exclusion. Journal of Radical Librarianship, 5, 113-152.
Anderson, J. E. (2015). Indigenous knowledge and intellectual property rights. En International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 769-778). Elsevier. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780080970868640783
Anderson, J. L. y Geismar, H. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge Companion to Cultural Property. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315641034
Anderson, J. y Montenegro, M. (2017). Collaborative encounters in digital cultural property. En J. Anderson & H. Geismar (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Cultural Property (pp. 431-451). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315641034
Atalay, S. (2012). Community-based archaeology: Research with, by, and for indigenous and local communities. University of California Press.
Ayala Rocabado, P. (2017). Arqueología y Pueblos Indígenas: Los casos Aymara, Atacameño, Mapuche y Rapa Nui. Boletín de la Sociedad Chilena de Arqueología, 47, 69-92.
Bell, J. A., Christen, K. y Turin, M. (2013). Introduction: After the Return. Museum Anthropology Review, 7(1-2), 1-21. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/mar/article/view/3184
Benardou, A., Champion, E., Dallas, C. y Hughes, L. M. (Eds.). (2018). Cultural heritage infrastructures in digital humanities. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Bezuidenhout, L. M., Leonelli, S., Kelly, A. H. y Rappert, B. (2017). Beyond the digital divide: Towards a situated approach to open data. Science and Public Policy, 44(4), 464-475. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw036
Biehl, P. F. y Prescott, C. (Eds.). (2013). Heritage in the Context of Globalization: Europe and the Americas. Springer.
Binford, L. R. (1987). Data, Relativism and Archaeological Science. Man, 22(3), 391. https://doi.org/10.2307/2802497
Boast, R.y Biehl. (2011). Archaeological knowledge production and dissemination in the digital age. En E. C. Kansa, S. W. Kansa y E. Watrall (Eds.), Archaeology 2.0: New Approaches to Communication and Collaboration (pp. 119-155). UCLA Costen Digital Archaeology Series.
Borgman, C. L. (2015). Big Data, Little Data, No Data: Scholarship in the Networked World. The MIT Press.
Boyd, D. y Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for Big Data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R., Walker, J. D., Anderson, J. y Hudson, M. (2020). The CARE principles for indigenous data governance. Data Science Journal, 19, 43. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043
Chapman, R. y Wylie, A. (2016). Evidential reasoning in archaeology. Bloomsbury.
Chippindale, C. (2000). Capta and Data: On the True Nature of Archaeological Information. American Antiquity, 65(4), 605-612. https://doi.org/10.2307/2694418
Christen, K. (2015). Tribal Archives, Traditional Knowledge, and Local Contexts: Why the “s” Matters. Journal of Western Archives, 6(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.26077/78d5-47cf
Christen, K. (2018). Relationships, Not records. Digital heritage and the ethics of sharing indigenous knowledge online. En J. Sayers (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to Media Studies and Digital Humanities (pp. 403-412). Routledge.
Christen, K. y Anderson, J. (2019). Toward slow archives. Archival Science, 19(2), 87-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09307-x
Christen, K., Merrill, A. y Wynne, M. (2017). A Community of Relations: Mukurtu Hubs and Spokes. D-Lib Magazine, 23(5/6). https://doi.org/10.1045/may2017-christen
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C. y Ferguson, T. J. (Eds.). (2008). Collaboration in archaeological practice: Engaging descendant communities. AltaMira Press.
CONICET. (2021). Políticas del Repositorio Institucional CONICET Digital. Versión 2.0. (pp. 1-25) [Resolución 2325/2021 APN-Conicet]. CONICET. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/wp/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/RD-2325-21-con-Politicas-del-RI-CONICET-Digital.pdf
Curtoni, R. P. (2016). Multivocalidad, geopolíticas y patrimonio. Prácticas situadas entre los rankulches del centro de Argentina Patrimonio y Multivocalidad. Teoría, práctica y experiencias en torno a la construcción del conocimiento en Patrimonio. En C. Gianotti García, D. Barreiro Martínez y B. Vienni Baptista (Eds.), Patrimonio y multivocalidad: Teoría, práctica y experiencias en torno a la construcción del conocimiento en patrimonio (pp. 115-124). CSIC, Universidad de la República.
DACyTAr. (2020). DACyTAr—Portal de datos de primarios en acceso abierto de la ciencia y Técnología Argentina del Sistema Nacional de Repositorios Digitales (SNRD). DACyTAr Portal. https://dacytar.mincyt.gob.ar/
Del Río Riande, G. (2022). Humanidades Digitales o las Humanidades en la intersección de lo digital, lo público, lo mínimo y lo abierto. Publicaciones de la Asociación Argentina de Humanidades Digitales, 3, e038. https://doi.org/10.24215/27187470e038
DNUDPI. (2008). Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los derechos de los pueblos indígenas. Naciones Unidas. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_es.pdf
Drucker, J. (2011). Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 5(1). https://doi.org/2555208513
Duarte, M. E. y Belarde-Lewis, M. (2015). Imagining: Creating spaces for indigenous ontologies. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(5-6), 677-702. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2015.1018396
Duarte, M. E., Vigil-Hayes, M., Littletree, S. y Belarde-Lewis, M. (2020). ‘Of course, data can never fully represent reality’: Assessing the Relationship between Indigenous Data and IK, TEK, and TK. Human Biology Open Access Pre-Prints, 163.
Dunnell, R. C. (1971). Sabloff and Smith’s “The Importance of Both Analytic and Taxonomic Classification in the Type-Variety System”. American Antiquity, 36(1), 115-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/278029
Faniel, I. M., Austin, A., Kansa, E., Kansa, S. W., France, P., Jacobs, J., Boytner, R. y Yakel, E. (2018). Beyond the Archive: Bridging Data Creation and Reuse in Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 6(2), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2018.2
Figuerero Torres, M. J. y Mengoni Goñalons, G. L. (2021). Consulta y participación indígena para un Centro de Interpretación en Los Antiguos, Santa Cruz. En Actas XII Congreso Argentino de Antropología Social (CAAS) (pp. 1-15). Universidad Nacional de La Plata; http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/133847. http://repositorio.filo.uba.ar/handle/filodigital/15219
Figuerero Torres, M. J. y Mengoni Goñalons, G. L. (2022). Trabajo colaborativo con las comunidades originarias de la provincia de Santa Cruz: Reflexiones a propósito de la creación de un “centro de interpretación” en Los Antiguos, Patagonia. En Memorias del VI Congreso Asociación Latinoamericana de Antropología: Vol. VII (pp. 371-380). ALA. http://repositorio.filo.uba.ar/handle/filodigital/15387
Figueroa Rodríguez, O. L. (2021, julio 1). Gobernanza de datos indígenas: Principios FAIR y CARE [Text]. CEPAL. https://www.cepal.org/es/notas/gobernanza-datos-indigenas-principios-fair-care
Floridi, L. (2012). Big Data and Their Epistemological Challenge. Philosophy & Technology, 25(4), 435-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-012-0093-4
Fowler, D. D. y Givens, D. R. (1995). The Records of Archaeology. En S. Silverman & N. Parezo (Eds.), Preserving the Anthropological Record (2.a ed.). Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. https://copar.umd.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/par9_fowler_givens.pdf
Fox, K. (2020). The Illusion of Inclusion—The “All of Us” Research Program and Indigenous Peoples’ DNA. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(5), 411-413. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1915987
Furner, J. (2016). “Data”: The data. En M. Kelly & J. Bielby (Eds.), Information Cultures in the Digital Age (pp. 287-306). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_17
Gattiglia, G. (2015). Think big about data: Archaeology and the Big Data challenge. Archäologische Informationen, 38, 113-124. https://doi.org/10.11588/AI.2015.1.26155
Geary, J., Jardine, C. G., Guebert, J. y Bubela, T. (2013). Access and benefits sharing of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge in northern Canada: Understanding the legal environment and creating effective research agreements. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 72(1), 21351. https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v72i0.21351
Geismar, H. (2018). Museum Object Lessons for the Digital Age. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787352810
Geismar, H. y Knox, H. (Eds.). (2021). Digital Anthropology (2nd. Ed.). Routledge.
Geser, G., Richards, J. D., Massara, F. y Wright, H. (2022). Data Management Policies and Practices of Digital Archaeological Repositories. Internet Archaeology, 59. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.59.2
GIDA. (2023, enero 23). Global Indigenous Data Alliance Promoting Indigenous Control of Indigenous Data. Global Indigenous Data Alliance. https://www.gida-global.org/history-of-indigenous-data-sovereignty
Gillies, V. y Aldred, P. (2005). The ethics of intention: Research as a political tool. En M. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop y T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (2.a ed., pp. 32-52). SAGE.
Gitelman, L. (Ed.). (2013). «Raw data» is an oxymoron. MIT Press.
Gubrium, A. y Harper, K. (2013). Participatory visual and digital methods. Left Coast Press.
Gupta, N., Martindale, A., Supernant, K. y Elvidge, M. (2023). The CARE Principles and the Reuse, Sharing, and Curation of Indigenous Data in Canadian Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 11(1), 76-89. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2022.33
Haraway, D. J. (1991). Ciencia, cyborgs, y mujeres la reinvención de la naturaleza. Ediciones Cátedra.
Hollinger, R. E. (2022). 3D Digital Replication: Emerging Cultural Domain for Native American Communities. En I. Krupnik (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 1: Introduction (pp. 182-195). Open Monographs. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.21262173
Hudson, M., Garrison, N. A., Sterling, R., Caron, N. R., Fox, K., Yracheta, J., Anderson, J., Wilcox, P., Arbour, L., Brown, A., Taualii, M., Kukutai, T., Haring, R., Te Aika, B., Baynam, G. S., Dearden, P. K., Chagné, D., Malhi, R. S., Garba, I., … Carroll, S. R. (2020). Rights, interests and expectations: Indigenous perspectives on unrestricted access to genomic data. Nature Reviews Genetics, 21(6), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-020-0228-x
Isaac, G. (2015). Perclusive alliances: Digital 3-D, museums, and the reconciling of culturally diverse knowledges. Current Anthropology, 56(S12), S286-S296. https://doi.org/10.1086/683296
Izeta, A. D. y Cattáneo, R. (2016). ¿Es posible una arqueología digital en Argentina? Un acercamiento desde la práctica. En Humanidades Digitales: Construcciones locales en contextos globales (pp. 1-11). Asociación Argentina de Humanidades Digitales. https://www.aacademica.org/aahd2016/15
Izeta, A. D. y Cattáneo, R. (2019). Archaeological digital repositories: Fostering networks from the Global South. En J. D. Richards y F. Niccolucci (Eds.), The Ariadne impact (Vol. 58, pp. 163-174). Archeolingua.
Izeta, A. D. y Cattáneo, R. (2021). Digital archiving for archaeology: The state of the art in Argentina. Internet Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.58.1
Izeta, A., Prado, I. y Cattáneo, R. (2021). Sentando las bases para una Arqueología Digital en Argentina. El rol de las infraestructuras digitales para la investigación. Intersecciones en Antropología, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.37176/iea.22.1.2021.595
Janke, T. (2018). Indigenous knowledge: Issues for protection and management (Australia). Innovation and Science, IP Australia & the Department of Industry. https://apo.org.au/node/182206
Jofré, I. C. y Gómez, N. C. (2022). El regreso de nuestros/as ancestros/as al territorio: Reflexiones sobre los archivos de la demanda warpe desde la mirada de sus protagonistas. En I. C. Jofré (Ed.), Cartografía de conflictos en territorios indígenas del Cuyum: Región de Cuyo, Argentina (pp. 451-506). Editorial UNSJ.
Kansa, E. C., Kansa, S. W. y Arbuckle, B. (2014). Publishing and Pushing: Mixing Models for Communicating Research Data in Archaeology. International Journal of Digital Curation, 9(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v9i1.301
Kansa, E. C., Kansa, S. W. y Watrall, E. (Eds.). (2011). Archaeology 2.0: New approaches to communication and collaboration. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.
Kansa, S. W., Atici, L., Kansa, E. C. y Meadow, R. H. (2020). Archaeological Analysis in the Information Age: Guidelines for Maximizing the Reach, Comprehensiveness, and Longevity of Data. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 8(1), 40-52. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2019.36
Katerere, D. R., Applequist, W., Aboyade, O. M. y Togo, C. (2020). En D. R. Katerere, W. Applequist, O. M. Aboyade y C. Togo (Eds.), Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge for the Modern Era: A Natural and Applied Science Perspective. CRC Press. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351981798
Kitchin, R. (2014). The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures & their Consequences. SAGE Publications.
Kremers, H. (Ed.). (2020). Digital Cultural Heritage. Springer.
Kukutai, T. y Taylor, J. (2016). Data sovereignty for indigenous peoples: Current practice and future needs. En T. Kukutai y J. Taylor (Eds.), Indigenous Data Sovereignty (pp. 1-22). ANU Press. DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016
Laluk, N. C., Montgomery, L. M., Tsosie, R., McCleave, C., Miron, R., Carroll, S. R., Aguilar, J., Thompson, A. B. W., Nelson, P., Sunseri, J., Trujillo, I., DeAntoni, G. M., Castro, G. y Schneider, T. D. (2022). Archaeology and social justice in Native America. American Antiquity, 87(4), 864-864. https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2022.89
Liggins, L., Hudson, M. y Anderson, J. (2021). Creating space for indigenous perspectives on access and benefit‐sharing: Encouraging researcher use of the Local Contexts Notices. Molecular Ecology, 30(11), 2477-2482. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15918
Littletree, S., Belarde-Lewis, M. y Duarte, M. (2020). Centering relationality: A conceptual model to advance indigenous knowledge organization practices. Knowledge Organization, 47(5), 410-426. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2020-5-410
Lonetree, A. (2012). Decolonizing museums: Representing native America in national and tribal museums. University of North Carolina Press.
Lord, P., Macdonald, A., Lyon, L. y Giaretta, D. (2004). From Data Deluge to Data Curation. Proceedings of the UK e-science All Hands meeting, 67, 371-375.
Lovett, R., Lee, V., Kukutai, T., Cormack, D., Rainie, S. C. y Walker, J. (2019). Good Data Practices for Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Governance. En A. Daly, S. K. Devitt y M. Mann (Eds.), Good data. Institute of Network Cultures.
Lublin, G., Robinson, S. y Rodríguez, M. E. (2023). El codiseño de la aplicación Orígenes como forma de resistencia: Un proyecto para “reconectar a las personas y sanar antiguas heridas”. En Patagonia literaria X - Resistencias poético-políticas desde el Sur. INOLAS.
Lucas, G. (2015). Evidence of what? On the possibilities of archaeological interpretation. En R. Chapman y A. Wylie (Eds.), Material evidence: Learning from archaeological practice (pp. 311-323). Routledge.
Luka, M. E. y Millette, M. (2018). (Re)framing Big Data: Activating Situated Knowledges and a Feminist Ethics of Care in Social Media Research. Social Media + Society, 4(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768297
Markham, A. N. (2013). Undermining ‘data’: A critical examination of a core term in scientific inquiry. First Monday, 18(10). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i10.4868
Mayer-Schönberger y Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data: A Revolution that will Transform how we Live, Work, and Think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
McAnany, P. A. y Rowe, S. M. (2015). Re-visiting the field: Collaborative archaeology as paradigm shift. Journal of Field Archaeology, 40(5), 499-507. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042458215Y.0000000007
McManamon, F. P., Kintigh, K. W. y Brin, A. (2010). Digital Antiquity and the Digital Archaeological Record (tDAR): Broadening Access and Ensuring Long-Term Preservation for Digital Archaeological Data. Center for the Study of Architecture CSA Newsletter, XXIII(2), Electronic document.
Meghini, C., Scopigno, R., Richards, J., Wright, H., Geser, G., Cuy, S., Fihn, J., Fanini, B., Hollander, H., Niccolucci, F., Felicetti, A., Ronzino, P., Nurra, F., Papatheodorou, C., Gavrilis, D., Theodoridou, M., Doerr, M., Tudhope, D., Binding, C. y Vlachidis, A. (2017). ARIADNE: A Research Infrastructure for Archaeology. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 10(3), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064527
Miller, D. y Horst, H. A. (Eds.). (2012). Digital Anthropology. Berg.
Montenegro, M. (2019). Subverting the universality of metadata standards: The TK labels as a tool to promote Indigenous data sovereignty. Journal of Documentation, 75(4), 731-749. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-08-2018-0124
Moreton-Robinson, A. (2021). Incommensurable sovereignties. Indigenous ontology matters. En B. Hokowhitu, A. Moreton-Robinson, L. T. Smith, Andersen y S. Larkin (Eds.), Routledge handbook of critical indigenous studies (pp. 257-268). Routledge.
Murillo, L. F. R. (2018). What Does “Open Data” Mean for Ethnographic Research?: Multimodal Anthropologies. American Anthropologist, 120(3), 577-582. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13088
Nicholson, C., Kansa, S., Gupta, N. y Fernandez, R. (2023). Will It ever be FAIR?: Making archaeological data findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 11(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2022.40
O’Brien, M. J. y Lee Lyman, R. (2002). The epistemological nature of archaeological units. Anthropological Theory, 2(1), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499602002001287
Passamaquoddy People. (2020). Our Grandfathers Voices—Wax Cylinder Project. Passamaquoddy Peoples’ Knowledge Portal. https://passamaquoddypeople.com/collection/our-grandfathers-voices-wax-cylinder-project
Pavis, M. y Wallace, A. (2020). SCuLE Response for the EMRIP Report on repatriation of ceremonial objects and human remains under the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3760293
Raine, S. R., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D. y Martinez, A. (2017). Policy Brief (Version 2): Data Governance for Native Nation Rebuilding. Native Nations Institute. https://nnigovernance.arizona.edu/policy-brief-data-governance-native-nation-rebuilding
Rainie, S. C., Kukutai, T., Walter, M., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Walker, J. y Axelsson, P. (2019). Indigenous data sovereignty. En The State of Open Data. Histories and Horizons. African Minds and International Development Research Centre.
Ramenofsky, A. F. y Steffen, A. (Eds.). (1998). Unit issues in archaeology: Measuring time, space, and material. University of Utah Press.
Rappaport, J. (2018). Más allá de la observación participante: La etnografía colaborativa como innovación teórica. En Xochitl Leyva (Ed.), Prácticas otras de conocimiento(s): Entre crisis, entre guerras: Vol. Tomo I (1a edición digital, pp. 323-352). CLACSO: Cooperativa Editorial Retos; PDTG; IWGIA; Talleres Paradigmas Emancipatorios: Proyect Alice; Espejos Extraños, Lecciones Insospechadas; Taller Editorial La Casa del Mago.
Richards, J. D. (2017). Twenty years preserving data: A view from the United Kingdom. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 5(3), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2017.11
Richards, J. D., Jakobsson, U., Novák, D., Štular, B. y Wright, H. (2021). Digital archiving in archaeology: The state of the art. Introduction. Internet Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.58.23
Richards, J. D. y Niccolucci, F. (Eds.). (2019). The Ariadne impact. Archeolingua. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3476712
Roca, I. J. (2020). Caminos del Agua. Tecnología y participación indígena en el sitio arqueológico Cerro de los Viejos. Proyectos y Experiencias Revista PH, 101, 274-283.
Roca, I. J. (2021). Aplicación de realidad aumentada en el sitio arqueológico Cerro de los Viejos, La Pampa, Argentina. REVISTA INCLUSIONES, 8(Núm. Esp.), 112-130.
Rodríguez, M. E. (2019). Los tehuelches ante el deseo patrimonializador. En D. Arellano y L. Ebenau (Eds.), Antropología y procesos de patrimonialización en el Mercosur (pp. 45-62). Fundación Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, UNaM.
Rosenberg, D. (2013). Data before the fact. En L. Gitelman (Ed.), «Raw data» is an oxymoron (pp. 15-40). The MIT Press.
Ruckstuhl, K. (2022). Trust in Scholarly Communications and Infrastructure: Indigenous Data Sovereignty. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.752336
Shava, S. (2020). Indigenous/tribal Knowledges – Definition and relevance in the Modern era. En D. R. Katerere, W. Applequist, O. M. Aboyade y C. Togo (Eds.), Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge for the Modern Era: A Natural and Applied Science Perspective. CRC Press. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351981798
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2 Ed). Zed Books.
Snipp, C. M. (2016). What does data sovereignty imply: What does it look like? En T. Kukutai y J. Taylor (Eds.), Indigenous Data Sovereignty (pp. 39-56). ANU Press. DOI: 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016
Tauli-Corpuz, V. (2016). Preface. En T. Kukutai y J. Taylor (Eds.), Indigenous Data Sovereignty (pp. xxi-xxiii). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016
Terlizzi, M. S. y Zukerfeld, M. (2022). Políticas de promoción del conocimiento y derechos de propiedad intelectual: Experiencias, propuestas y debates para la Argentina. Centro Interdisciplinario de Estudios en Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. http://www.ciecti.org.ar/politicas-de-promocion-del-conocimiento-y-derechos-de-propiedad-intelectual-experiencias-propuestas-y-debates-para-la-argentina/
Thomas, D. H. (1976). Figuring anthropology: First principles of probability and statistics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Torsen, M. y Anderson, J. (2010). Intellectual property and the safeguarding of traditional cultures: Legal issues and practical options for museums (Libraries and Archives). World Intellectual Property Organization. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1279&context=aprci
Tsosie, K. S., Yracheta, J. M., Kolopenuk, J. y Smith, R. W. A. (2021). Indigenous data sovereignties and data sharing in biological anthropology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 174(2), 183-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24184
Tuck, E. y Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), Article 1. https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/18630
Turner, H. (2020). Cataloguing culture: Legacies of colonialism in museum documentation. UBC Press.
Van Broekhoven, L. N. (2018). Calibrating relevance at the Pitt Rivers Museum. En J. Pellew & L. Goldman (Eds.), Dethroning Historical Reputations: Universities, Museums and the Commemoration of Benefactors (pp. 65-79). Institute of Historical Research, School of Advanced Study, University of London. https://doi.org/10.14296/718.9781909646834
Walter, M., Kukutai, T., Carroll, S. R. y Rodriguez-Lonebear, D. (2021). Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Policy (1.a ed.). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780429273957
Watts, J. (2011). Building tDAR: Review, Reduction, and Ingest of Two Reports Series. Reports in Digital Archaeology, 1, 1-15.
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Witze, A. (2019). Disappearing Digital Data. The Archaeological Conservancy. https://www.archaeologicalconservancy.org/spring-2019-preview-disappearing-digital-data/
Zukerfeld, Mariano, Liaudat, S., Britto, F., Pereira, M. y Lerena, O. (2022). El financiamiento es de nosotros, las patentes son ajenas. La apropiación cognitiva de las invenciones del sistema de ciencia, tecnología e innovación de la Argentina. En M. S. Terlizzi y M. Zukerfeld (Eds.), Políticas de promoción del conocimiento y derechos de propiedad intelectual: Experiencias, propuestas y debates para la Argentina (pp. 212-237). Centro Interdisciplinario de Estudios en Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. http://www.ciecti.org.ar/politicas-de-promocion-del-conocimiento-y-derechos-de-propiedad-intelectual-experiencias-propuestas-y-debates-para-la-argentina/
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Guillermo Luis Mengoni Goñalons, María José Figuerero Torres
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Os autores que têm publicações nesta revista aceitam os seguintes termos:
a. Os autores reterão os seus direitos autorais e garantirão à revista o direito de primeira publicação do seu trabalho, que estará sujeito à Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons (Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons), que permite que terceiros compartilhem o trabalho enquanto o seu autor e a sua primeira publicação nesta revista.
b. Os autores podem adotar outros contratos de licença não exclusivos para a distribuição da versão do trabalho publicado (por exemplo, depositá-lo num arquivo eletrônico institucional ou publicá-lo num volume monográfico), desde que a publicação inicial nesta revista seja indicada.
v. É permitido e recomendado aos autores que divulguem os seus trabalhos na Internet (por exemplo, arquivos telemáticos institucionais ou no seu site) antes e durante o processo de envio, o que pode levar a trocas interessantes e aumentar citações do trabalho publicado. (Veja El efecto del acceso abierto - O efeito do acesso aberto.)
Como Citar
