Psychometric Properties of the EPOC Adolescent Well-being Scale in Venezuelan Students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v22.n3.39986

Keywords:

well-being, teenagers, positive psychology, psychometrics, validity

Abstract

The aim of this research was to analyze the psychometric properties of the EPOCH Adolescent Well-being Scale in Venezuelan Students. For this purpose, expert judges proceeded to examine the adequacy of the translation of the scale and adjusted five items by means of a reverse translation. Subsequently, the scale was applied to 523 young people between 13 and 18 years of age (M = 15.19; SD = 1.54; 51% males) in order to perform a confirmatory factor analysis that proved a five-dimensional structure (adequate fit indices). However, the factor engagement yielded some low factor loadings (< .5). In addition, an invariance test determined that the measurement model is the same for both sexes. Additionally, the reliability was appropriate for the overall scale and dimensions (α and ω > .7), with the exception of the engagement factor. Consequently, the latter aspect is discussed and suggestions are given regarding future research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Luis Rodríguez Chávez, Universidad Católica Andrés Bello

Licenciado en Psicología (UCAB). Profesor Investigador (CIEI-UCAB). Profesor instructor en la Escuela de Psicología (UCAB).

María Graciela Fernández-Siliano, Universidad Católica Andrés Bello

Licenciada en Educación (IPC-UPEL). Profesora Investigadora (CIEI-UCAB). Profesora agregada en la Escuela de Educación y Comunicación Social (UCAB).

References

Acock, A. C. (2012). What to do about missing values. En H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol. 3. Data Analysis and Research Publication (pp. 27-50). American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/13621-002

Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955-959. doi: 10.1177/001316448004000419

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131-142. doi: 10.1177/0013164485451012

Álvarez-Álvarez, E., González-Zepeda, A. P., & Chávez-López, J. K. (2017). Conceptos Iniciales. En F. González-Betanzos, M. del C. Escoto-Ponce de León & J. K. Chávez-López (Eds.). Estadística Aplicada en Psicología y Ciencias de la Salud (pp. 13-35). Ciudad de México: Manual Moderno.

American Psychological Association (2016). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Recuperado de https://www.apa.org

Ato, M., López-García, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 29(3), 1038-1059. doi: 10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511

Bollen, K. A. (1990). A comment on model evaluation and modification. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 181-185. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_5

Bonett, D. G., & Wright, T. A. (2015). Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 3-15. doi: 10.1002/job.1960

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Brown, T. A., & Moore, M. T. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis. En R. H. Hoyle (Ed.). Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling (pp. 361-379). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Chahín-Pinzón, N. (2014). Aspectos a tener en cuenta cuando se realiza una adaptación de test entre diferentes culturas. Psychologia. Avances de la Disciplina, 8(2), 109-112. doi: 10.21500/19002386.1225

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

Chui, W. H., & Wong, M. Y. H. (2016). Gender differences in happiness and life satisfaction among adolescents in Hong Kong: Relationships and self-concept. Social Indicators Research, 125(3), 1035-1051. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0867-z

Demirci, İ., & Ekşi, F. (2015). Ergenler için beş boyutlu iyi oluş modeli: EPOCH ölçeği’nin Türkçe formunun geçerliği ve güvenirliği. Gençlik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 9-30. Recuperado de https://toad.halileksi.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/epoch-olcegi-toad.pdf

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2018). Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 15. doi: 10.1525/collabra.115

Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 253-260. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0307-6

Fernández, A., Pérez, E., Alderete, A. M., Richaud, M. C., & Fernández-Liporace, M. (2010). ¿Construir o adaptar tests psicológicos? Diferentes respuestas a una cuestión controvertida. Revista Evaluar, 10(1), 60-74. doi: 10.35670/1667-4545.v10.n1.459

Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: Origins, development and future directions. Psicothema, 29(2), 236-240. Recuperado de https://www.psicothema.com

Ferrando, P. J., Lorenzo-Seva, U., Hernández-Dorado, A., & Muñiz, J. (2022). Decálogo para el análisis factorial de los ítems de un test. Psicothema, 34(1), 7-17. Recuperado de http://www.psicothema.com

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis. Boston, MA: Cengage.

Hernández, A., Hidalgo, M. D., Hambleton, R. K., & Gómez-Benito, J. (2020). International Test Commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist. Psicothema, 32(3), 390-398. Recuperado de http://www.psicothema.com

Kaplan, D. (1989). Model modification in covariance structure analysis: Application of the expected parameter change statistic. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(3), 285-305. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2403_2

Kern, M. L., Benson, L., Steinberg, E. A., & Steinberg, L. (2016). The EPOCH measure of adolescent well-being. Psychological Assessment, 28(5), 586-597. doi: 10.1037/pas0000201

Kern, M. L., Zeng, G., Hou, H., & Peng, K. (2019). The Chinese version of the EPOCH measure of adolescent well-being: Testing cross-cultural measurement invariance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37(6), 757-769. doi: 10.1177/0734282918789561

Londoño-Pérez, C., Velasco-Salamanca, M., Alejo-Castañeda, I., Botero-Soto, P., & Joliet-Vanegas, I. (2014). What makes us optimistic?: Psychosocial factors as predictors of dispositional optimism in young people. Terapia Psicológica, 32(2), 153-164. doi: 10.4067/S0718-48082014000200008

Love, J., Selker, R., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Dropmann, D., Verhagen, J., ... Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2019). JASP: Graphical Statistical Software for Common Statistical Designs. Journal of Statistical Software, 88(2), 1-17. doi: 10.18637/jss.v088.i02

Maddux, J. E. (2017). Subjective well-being and life satisfaction. An introduction to conceptions, theories, and measures. En J. E. Maddux (Ed.). Subjective Well-Being and Life Satisfaction (pp. 3-32). doi: 10.4324/9781351231879

Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519-530. doi: 10.1093/biomet/57.3.519

Maurer, M. M., Daukantaitė, D., & Hoff, E. (2021). Testing the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the EPOCH measure of adolescent well-being. PloS One, 16(10), e0259191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259191

Muñiz, J. (2018). Introducción a la Psicometría. Teoría Clásica y TRI. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.

Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: Segunda edición. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157. Recuperado de https://www.psicothema.com

Ortiz-Correa, P., Proestakis-Maturana, A., & Leiva-Gutiérrez, J. (2020). Adaptación chilena de la Escala de Bienestar Adolescente EPOCH. Revista Electrónica en Educación y Pedagogía, 4(7), 54-66. doi: 10.15658/rev.electron.educ.pedagog20.11040705

Peña, G. (2017). Estadística Inferencial: Una Introducción para las Ciencias del Comportamiento (2da ed.). Caracas, Venezuela: ABediciones.

Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004

Ramada-Rodilla, J. M., Serra-Pujadas, C., & Delclós-Clanchet, G. L. (2013). Adaptación cultural y validación de cuestionarios de salud: Revisión y recomendaciones metodológicas. Salud Pública de México, 55(1), 57-66. Recuperado de https://saludpublica.mx

Richaud de Minzi, M. C. (2008). Nuevas tendencias en psicometría. Revista Evaluar, 8(1), 1-19. doi: 10.35670/1667-4545.v8.n1.501

Rose, T., Joe, S., Williams, A., Harris, R., Betz, G., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2017). Measuring mental wellbeing among adolescents: A systematic review of instruments. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(9), 2349-2362. doi: 10.1007/s10826-017-0754-0

Seligman, M. E. P. (2016). Florecer: La Nueva Psicología Positiva y la Búsqueda del Bienestar. Ciudad de México: Océano.

Seligman, M. E. P. (2019). Positive psychology: A personal history. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 1-23. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095653

Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5

Taheri, A., Pourshahriari, M., Abdollahi, A., & Hosseinian, S. (2022). Psychometric assessment of the Persian translation of the EPOCH measure among adolescent girls. Current Psychology 41, 4961-4970. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-01013-7

Universidad Católica Andrés Bello (2002). Contribuciones a la Deontología de la Investigación en Psicología. Caracas, Venezuela: Escuela de Psicología UCAB.

VandenBos, G. R. (2015). APA Dictionary of Psychology (2da ed.). EE. UU.: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/14646-000

Zelenski, J. M. (2019). Positive Psychology: The Science of Well-being. Londres, Reino Unido: Sage.

Zeng, G., & Kern, M. L. (2019). The Chinese EPOCH measure of adolescent wellbeing: Further testing of the psychometrics of the measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1457. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01457

Zhang, K., Wu, S., Xu, Y., Cao, W., Goetz, T., & Parks-Stamm, E. J. (2021). Adaptability promotes student engagement under COVID-19: The multiple mediating effects of academic emotion. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.633265

Published

2023-01-01

How to Cite

Rodríguez Chávez, L., & Fernández-Siliano, M. G. (2023). Psychometric Properties of the EPOC Adolescent Well-being Scale in Venezuelan Students. Revista Evaluar, 22(3), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v22.n3.39986

Issue

Section

Investigaciones originales