Portrayers of butterflies. The subordination of comparison in today’s Social and Cultural Anthropology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v8.n1.9516Keywords:
social and/or cultural Anthropology, comparison, ethnography anthropological theory, epistemologyAbstract
In today’s social and/or cultural anthropology, there is a trend to consider comparison as an auxiliary resource to ethnography whose usefulness is restricted to the detection and analysis of diversity. This paper argues that such situation has negative effects on the control of comparative procedures, on ethnography’s productivity, on the ability of anthropologists to produce theoretical generalizations and, consequently, on the relevance of the discipline itself. It is suggested that, in order to recover anthropology’s ability to formulate generalizations, we must restore comparison in its condition as an analytical resource in its own right and overcome the naturalization of its connection with diversity. The epistemological foundations of this enterprise are outlined in order to trace two possible ways to combine comparison and ethnography which would facilitate the simultaneous production of case analysis and theoretical-methodological resources.Downloads
References
Bachelard, G. 1979 [1949]. El racionalismo aplicado. Paidós, Buenos Aires.
Balbi, F. A. 2007. De leales, desleales y traidores. Valor moral y concepción de política en el peronismo. Editorial Antropofagia, Buenos Aires.
Balbi, F. A. 2009. ¿Explicar ‘el peronismo’? Apuntes para un debate pendiente. A propósito de ‘Del peronismo como promesa’, de Silvia Sigal. Desarrollo Económico, Vol. 49, No 193: 151-160.
Balbi, F. A. 2012. La integración dinámica de las ‘perspectivas nativas’ en la investigación etnográfica. Intersecciones en Antropología, 13 (2): 485-499.
Balbi, F. A. 2014. ‘...quiero andar con mucha libertad.’ Consideraciones en torno de los lugares de las organizaciones partidarias y de la conducción en la praxis política de los peronistas. J. Melon, N. Quiroga (Comps.), El peronismo y sus partidos. Tradiciones y prácticas políticas entre 1946 y 1976, 30-55. Ed. ProHistoria, Rosario.
Barnes, J. A. 1962. African Models in the New Guinea Highlands. Man, 62 (Jan.): 5-9
Barth, F. 1967. On the study of social change. American Anthropologist, 69: 661-669.
Barth, F. 1972. Analytical dimensions in the comparison of social organization. American Anthropologist, 74 (1/2): 207-220.
Barth, F. 1993. Balinese worlds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London.
Barth, F. 1995. Cosmologies in the making. A generative approach to cultural variation in inner New Guinea. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Barth, F. 2000a [1995]. Metodologias comparativas na análise dos dados antropológicos. T. Lask (Org.), O guru, o iniciador e outras variações antropológicas, 187-200. Contra Capa, Rio de Janeiro.
Barth, F. 2000b [1990]. O guru e o iniciador. Transações de conhecimento e moldagem da cultura no sudeste da Àsia e da Melanésia. T. Lask (Org.), op. cit., 141-165.
Bloch, M. 2005. Where did anthropology go? Or the need for ‘human nature’. Essays on cultural transmission, 1-19, Berg, Oxford.
Bourdieu, P., J-C. Chamboredon y J-C. Passeron. 1986 [1973]. El oficio de sociólogo. Siglo XXI, México.
Canguilhem, G. 2002 [1968]. Gaston Bachelard. Estudios de historia y de filosofía de las ciencias, 183-218, Amorrortu, Buenos Aires – Madrid.
Csordas, T. J. 2013. Morality as a Cultural System? Current Anthropology, Vol. 54, No. 5: 523-546.
Dilley, R. (Ed.). 1999a. The problem of context. Bergham Books, New York and Oxford.
Dilley, R. 1999b. Preface. R. Dilley (Ed.), op. cit., ix-xiv.
Dilley, R. 1999c. Introduction: The problem of context. R. Dilley (Ed.), op. cit., 1-46.
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1977 [1940]. Los Nuer. Anagrama, Barcelona.
Falk Moore, S. 2005. Comparisons: Possible and Impossible. Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 34: 1-11
Fortes, M. 1945. The dynamics of clanship among the Tallensi. International African Institute - Oxford University Press, London.
Fortes, M., E. E: Evans-Pritchard. 1979 [1940]. Sistemas políticos africanos. J. Llobera (comp.), Antropología política, 85-105, Anagrama, Barcelona.
Fox, R. G., A. Gingrich. 2002. Introduction. A. Gingrich, R. G. Fox (Eds.), op. cit., 1-24.
Geertz, C. 1987 [1973]. Descripción densa: hacia una teoría interpretativa de la cultura. La interpretación de las culturas, 19-40, Gedisa, México.
Geertz, C. 1994a [1980]. Géneros confusos: la refiguración del pensamiento social. Conocimiento local, 31-49, Barcelona, Gedisa.
Geertz, C. 1994b [1977]. Hallado en traducción: sobre la historia social de la imaginación moral: Conocimiento... op. cit., 51-71.
Gingrich, A., R. G. Fox (Eds.). 2002. Anthropology, by comparison. Routledge, London and New York.
Goody, J. 1976. Production and reproduction. A comparative study of the domestic domain. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Goody, J. 1985 [1977]. La domesticación del pensamiento salvaje. Akal, Barcelona.
Goody, J. 1986 [1983]. La evolución de la familia y del matrimonio en Europa. Herder, Barcelona.
Goody, J.1990. The oriental, the ancient and the primitive: systems of marriage and the family in the pre-industrial societies of Eurasia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Goody, J. 1995. The expansive moment. The rise of social anthropology in Britain and Africa, 1918 – 1970. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Goody, J. 1999 [1997]. Representaciones y contradicciones. La ambivalencia hacia las imágenes, el teatro, la ficción, las reliquias y la sexualidad. Paidós, Barcelona.
Goody, J. 2006. The theft of history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Gregor, T. A., D. Tuzin (Eds.). 2001. Gender in Amazonia and Melanesia: An exploration of the comparative method. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Hastrup, K. 1992. Writing ethnography: state of the art. J. Okely, H. Callaway (eds.), Anthropology & autobiography, 116-133, Routledge, London and New York.
Hastrup, K., P. Hervik. 1994. Introduction. K. Hastrup, P. Hervik (eds.), Social experience and anthropological knowledge, 1-9, Routledge, London and New York.
Heintz, M. 2009. Introduction: Why there should be an anthropology of moralities? M. Heintz (Ed.), The anthropology of moralities, 1-19. Berghahn Books, New York.
Heredia, B. 2003. Conflictos y desafíos: luchas en el interior de la facción política. A. Rosato y F. A. Balbi (Eds.), Representaciones sociales y procesos políticos. Estudios desde la antropología social, 45-60. Centro de Antropología Social – Instituto de Desarrollo Económico y Social & Ed. Antropofagia, Buenos Aires.
Hobart, M. 1987. Summer’s days and salad days: the coming of age of anthropology? L. Holy (Ed.), op. cit., 22-51.
Holy, L. 1987a (Ed.). Comparative anthropology. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Holy, L. 1987b. Introduction. Description, generalization and comparison: two paradigms. L. Holy (Ed.) op. cit., 1-21.
Howell, S. 1994. ‘Reading culture’: or how anthropological texts create fieldwork expectations and shape future texts. E. Archetti (Ed.), Exploring the written. Anthropology and the multiplicity of writing, 317-336, Scandinavian University Press, Oslo.
Ingold, T. 2008. Anthropology is not ethnography. Proceedings of the British Academy, 154: 69-92.
Kuper, A. 2002. Comparison and contextualization: reflections on South Africa. A. Gingrich, R. G. Fox (Eds.), op. cit., 143-166.
Lewis, T. A. 2005. Frames of comparison. Anthropology and Inheriting Traditional Practices. Journal of Religious Ethics, 33: 225-253.
Lewis, T. A., J. Wyn Schofer, A. Stalnaker, and M. A. Berkson. 2005. Anthropos and ethics. Categories of Inquiry and Procedures of Comparison. Journal of Religious Ethics, 33: 177-185.
Makler, C. A., M. L. Lafiosca. 2014. Una revisión crítica de la teoría del ‘Tiempo de la Política’. Cuadernos de Antropología, 11: 69-85.
Marx, K. 1987 [1857]. Introducción general a la crítica de la economía política / 1857. Siglo XXI, México.
Matos Viegas, S. de. 2009. Can anthropology make valid generalizations? Feelings of belonging in the brazilian Atlantic Forest. Social Analysis, Vol. 53, Iss. 2, Summer 2009: 147-162.
Melhuus, M. 2002. Issues of relevance: anthropology and the challenges of cross-cultural comparison. A. Gingrich, R. G. Fox (Eds.): op. cit., 70-91.
Nadel, S. F. 1978 [1951]. Fundamentos de antropología social. FCE, México.
Overing, J. 1987. Translation as a creative process: the power of the name. L. Holy (Ed.), op. cit., 70-87.
Palmeira, M. 2003 [1996]. Política, facciones y voto. A. Rosato, F. A. Balbi (Eds.), op. cit., 31-44.
Palmeira, M., B. Heredia. 1995. “Os comícios e a política de facções. Anuário Antropologico, 94: 31-94.
Parkin, D. (Ed.). 1980. Semantic Anthropology. A.S.A. Monograph 22. Academic Press, London.
Putnam, H. 1981. Reason, truth and history, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rasanagayam, J. 2009. Morality, self and power: The idea of the Mahalla in Usbekistan. M. Heintz (Ed.), op. cit., 102-117.
Robbins, J. 2009. Morality, value, and radical cultural change. M. Heintz (Ed.), op. cit., 62-80.
Sanjek, R. 2002. Ethnography. A. Barnard, J. Spencer (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Social-Cultural Anthropology, 295-302, Routledge, London and New York.
Spiro, M. 1986. Cultural Relativism and the Future of Anthropology. Cultural Anthropology, 1 (3): 259-186.
Strathern, M. 1991 [1987]. Fuera de contexto. Las ficciones persuasivas de la antropología. C. Reynoso (comp.), El surgimiento de la antropología posmoderna, 214-274, México, Gedisa.
Viveiros de Castro, E. 2004. Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, Vol. 2, Iss. 1: pp. 3-22.
Weber, M. 1990. Ensayos sobre metodología sociológica. Amorrortu, Buenos Aires.
Yengoyan, A. 2006a (Ed.). Modes of comparison: theory and practice. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Yengoyan, A. 2006b. Introduction: on the issue of comparison. A. Yengoyan (Ed.), op. cit., 1-27.
Yengoyan, A. 2006c. Comparison and its discontents. A. Yengoyan (Ed.), op. cit., 137-158.
Zigon, J. 2009. Within a Range of Possibilities: Morality and Ethics in Social Life. Ethnos,74:2: 251-276
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Those authors who have publications with this Journalaccept the following terms:
a. Authors will retain their copyrights and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and his first publication in this journal.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (eg, deposit it in an institutional electronic file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work on the Internet (eg in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access - El efecto del acceso abierto)
How to Cite
