Una historia de los estudios tecnológicos líticos en la arqueología paleoindia en los Estados Unidos de América

Autores/as

  • Bethany Potter
  • Frederic Sellet

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v16.n1.38778

Palabras clave:

Análisis lítico, Tecnología lítica, Historia de la arqueología, Arqueología norteamericana, Paleoindio, Clovis, Folsom

Resumen

Durante mucho tiempo, los análisis líticos han ocupado el centro de los estudios paleoindios en los Estados Unidos, y pese a cambios cruciales que se introdujeron el método y la orientación, los primeros enfoques tipológicos siguen ejerciendo una influencia importante en la comprensión de los conjuntos paleoindios por parte de los arqueólogos. Este capítulo refuta estos enfoques normativos y sustenta perspectivas dinámicas sobre el comportamiento humano. Lo hace delineando las contribuciones históricas de los estudios tecnológicos a la disciplina, desde las primeras influencias europeas hasta los marcos más holísticos que se emplean en la actualidad. Nuestra discusión resalta tres fases de desarrollo fundamentales, a partir de un trabajo experimental clave en el punto de Folsom a mediados del siglo XX. Esto condujo a una mayor atención en los aspectos tecnológicos de la producción y el uso de herramientas. La segunda fase está particularmente influida por el desarrollo de la arqueología procesual, que tuvo un marcado efecto en la conceptualización de los conjuntos líticos. Generó gran cantidad de enfoques sistémicos centrados en la economía de las materias primas líticas. Por último, y más recientemente, el auge de los estudios ecológicos culturales ha remodelado nuevamente este panorama al crear modos de análisis que entienden la tecnología lítica como una adaptación estratégica en lugar de un fósil cultural. Para integrar estos desarrollos dentro del campo más amplio de los estudios paleoindios, hemos consideramos artículos seminales y su función en el anuncio de nuevas orientaciones, junto con datos que ilustran estas tendencias en la publicación.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Akerman, K., & Fagan, J. L. (1986). Fluting the Lindenmeier Folsom: A Simple and Economical Solution to the Problem, and Its Implications for Other Fluted Point Technologies. Lithic Technology, 15(1), 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01977261.1986.11720860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.1986.11720860

Amick, D. S. (2007). Investigating the behavioral causes and archaeological effects of lithic recycling. In S. P. McPherron (Ed.), Tools Versus Cores: Alternative Approaches to Stone Tool Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Bamforth, D. B., & Bleed, P. (1997). Technology, Flaked Stone Technology, and Risk. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 7(1), 31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/ap3a.1997.7.1.109

Bernstein, D. J., & Lenardi, M. J. (2005). Glacial Erratics as Sources of Lithic Raw Material: The McGregor Site on Long Island, New York. Lithic Technology, 30(2), 145–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2005.11721031

Binford, L. R. (1962). Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity, 28(2), 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/278380

Binford, L. R. (1968). Some Comments on Historical versus Processual Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 24(3), 267-275. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.24.3.3629348

Binford, L. R., & Binford, S. R. (1966). A Preliminary Analysis of Functional Variability in the Mousterian of Levallois Facies. American Anthropologist, 68(2), 238-295. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1525/aa.1966.68.2.02a001030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1966.68.2.02a001030

Bleed, P. (2001). Trees or chains, links or branches: conceptual alternatives for consideration of stone tool production and other sequential activities. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 8(1), 101–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009526016167

Bordes, F. (1955). Le Paléolithique inférieur et moyen de Jabrud (Syrie) et la question du Pré-Aurignacien. l’Anthropologie, 59(5-6), 486-507.

Bowman, D. L., & Givens, D. R. (1996). Stratigraphic Excavation: The First “New Archaeology”. American Anthropologist, 98(1), 80-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1996.98.1.02a00080

Brantingham, P. J. (2003). A Neutral Model of Stone Raw Material Procurement. American Antiquity, 68(03), 487-509. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0002731600048034/type/journal_article DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3557105

Buchanan, B., Andrews, B., Kilby, J. D., & Eren, M. I. (2019). Settling into the country: Comparison of Clovis and Folsom lithic networks in western North America shows increasing redundancy of toolstone use. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 53, 32-42. Retrieved from https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S027841651830014X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2018.10.004

Callahan, E. (1976). A Lithic Workshop Symposium. Lithic Technology, 5(1-2), 3-5. doi:10.1080/01977261.1976.11754413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.1976.11754413

Callahan, E. (1977). Variability in the early stages of manufacture of Virginia fluted points. (M.A.). Catholic University of America,

Callahan, E. (1979). The Basics of Biface Knapping in the Eastern Fluted Point Tradition: A Manual for Flintknappers and Lithic Analysts. Archaeology of Eastern North America, 7(1), 1-180.

Collins, M. B. (1974). A Functional Analysis of Lithic Technology Among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers of Southwestern France and Western Texas. University of Arizona, Tuscon.

Collins, M. B. (1975). Lithic Technology as a Means of Processual Inference. In E. H. Swanson (Ed.), Lithic Technology. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.

Crabtree, D. (1966). A Stoneworker’s Approach to Analyzing and Replicating the Lindenmeier Folsom. Tebiwa, 9, 3-39.

Eren, M. I., Lycett, S. J., Patten, R. J., Buchanan, B., Pargeter, J., & O’Brien, M. J. (2016). Test, Model, and Method Validation: The Role of Experimental Stone Artifact Replication in Hypothesis-driven Archaeology. Ethnoarchaeology, 8(2), 103-136. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19442890.2016.1213972 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19442890.2016.1213972

Flenniken, J. J. (1978). Reevaluation of the Lindenmeier Folsom: A Replication Experiment in Lithic Technology. American Antiquity, 43(3), 473-480. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0002731600080203/type/journal_article DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/279406

Frison, G. C., & Bradley, B. A. (1982). Fluting of Folsom Projectile Points. In G. C. Frison & D. Stanford (Eds.), The Agate Basin Site: A Record of the Paleoindian Occupation of the Northwestern High Plains (pp. 209-212). New York: Academic Press, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2sx9g56.16

Goodyear, A. C. (1989). A Hypothesis for the Use of Cryptocrystalline Raw Materials Among Paleoindian Groups of North America. In C. Ellis & J. Lothorop (Eds.), Eastern Paleoindian Lithic Source Use. Boulder: Westview Press.

Holmes, W. H. (1890). A Quarry Workshop of the Flaked-Stone Implement Makers in the District of Columbia. American Anthropologist, 3(1), 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1890.3.1.02a00020

Holmes, W. H. (1892). Modern Quarry Refuse and the Palaeolithic Theory. Science, 20(512), 285-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ns-20.512.295

Ingbar, E. E. (1994). Lithic Material Selection and Technological Organization. In P. J. Carr (Ed.), The Organization of North American Prehistoric Chipped Stone Tool Technologies. Ann Arbor.

Irwin, H. T. (1967). The Itama: late Pleistocene inhabitants of the Plains of the United States and Canada and the American Southwest. In A. Harvard University. Department of (Ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Irwin, H. T., & Wormington, H. M. (1970). Paleo-Indian Tool Types in the Great Plains. American Antiquity, 35(1), 24-34. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0002731600084237/type/journal_article DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/278175

Jennings, T. A., Smallwood, A. M., & Pevny, C. D. (2021). Reviewing the Role of Experimentation in Reconstructing Paleoamerican Lithic Technologies. PaleoAmerica, 7(1), 53-67. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20555563.2020.1848269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2020.1848269

Johnson, L. L., Behm, J. A., Bordes, F., Cahen, D., Crabtree, D. E., Dincauze, D. F., . . . Sheets, P. D. (1978). A History of Flint-Knapping Experimentation, 1838-1976 [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology, 19(2), 337-372. Retrieved from https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/202078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/202078

Kelly, R. L., & Todd, L. C. (1988). Coming into the Country: Early Paleoindian Hunting and Mobility. American Antiquity, 53(2), 231-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/281017

Knudson, R. (1970). Organizational Variability in Late Paleo-Indian Assemblages. Retrieved from

Knudson, R. (1982). Don E. Crabtree, 1912–1980. American Antiquity, 47(2), 336-343. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0002731600061229/type/journal_article DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002731600061229

Knudson, R. (1983). Organizational Variability in Late Paleo-Indian Assemblages. Retrieved from

Knudson, R. (2009). The Early Expeditions: University of Wyoming, Harvard University, and the Peabody Museum. In M. L. Larson, M. Kornfeld, & G. C. Frison (Eds.), Hell Gap: A Stratified Paleoindian Campsite at the Edge of the Rockies (pp. 14-35). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

Kolhatkar, M. (2022). Analyzing skill in lithic dispersions using width, thickness and width-by-thickness ratio. Lithic Technology, 47(4), 354-371. doi:10.1080/01977261.2022.2084228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2022.2084228

LaBelle, J. M. (2004). The Professional and The Amateur, Yesterday and Today. Central States Archaeological Journal, 51(2), 123-125.

Meltzer, D. J. (1983). The Antiquity of Man and the Development of American Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 6, 1-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-003106-1.50006-7

Meltzer, D. J. (2003). Peopling of North America. In Developments in Quaternary Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 539-563): Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1571-0866(03)01026-1

Meltzer, D. J. (2015). Pleistocene Overkill and North American Mammalian Extinctions. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44(1), 33–53. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013854 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013854

Meltzer, D. J., Todd, L. C., & Holliday, V. T. (2002). The Folsom (Paleoindian) Type Site: Past Investigations, Current Studies. American Antiquity, 67(1), 5–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2694875

Nami, H. G. (2019). Errett H. Callahan (1937-2019): Researcher, flintknapper, and artist. Journal of Lithic Studies, 6(1), 1-12. doi:10.2218/jls.4124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.4124

Odell, G. (2005). Lithic Analysis. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Pollock, S. G., Hamilton, N. D., & Bonnichsen, R. (1999). Chert from the Munsungen Lake Formation (Maine) in Palaeoamerican archaeological sites in northeastern North America: recognition of its occurrence and distribution. Journal of Archaeological Science, 26(3), 269–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1998.0335

Ray, C. N. (1938). The Clear Fork Culture Complex. TexasArcheological and Paleontological Society, Bulletin, 10, 193-207.

Renaud, E.-B. (1937). Les Pointes américaines de Folsom et de Yuma. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique de France, 34(10), 449-457. Retrieved from https://www.persee.fr/doc/bspf_0249-7638_1937_num_34_10_5505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1937.5505

Renaud, E. B. (1928). L’Antiquite de l’homme dans l’Amerique du Nord.

Roberts, F. H. H. J. (1935). A Folsom Complex: Preliminary Report on Investigations at the Lindenmeier Site in Northern Colorado (Vol. 4). Washington, D.C.: The Smithsonian Institution.

SAA. (1989). 1989 Crabtree Award for Avocational Archaeology. American Antiquity, 54(4), 681-682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002731600075004

Seebach, J. D. (2006). Drought or Development? Patterns of Paleoindian Site Discovery on the Great Plains of North America. Plains Anthropologist, 51(197), 71-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/pan.2006.004

Shott, M. J. (2017). Stage and continuum approaches in prehistoric biface production: A North American perspective. PLOS ONE, 12(3), e0170947. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170947

Smith, H. L., & Tune, J. W. (2019). Variation in fluted-point technology: investigations across space and time. PaleoAmerica, 5(2), 105-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2019.1618176

Sollberger, J. B. (1985). A Technique For Folsom Fluting. Lithic Technology, 14(1), 41-50. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01977261.1985.11754501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.1985.11754501

Spiess, A., Wilson, D., & Bradley, J. (1998). Paleoindian occupation in the New England-Maritimes region: Beyond cultural ecology. Archaeology of Eastern North America, 26(1998), 201–264.

Trigger, B. (1991). Constraint and Freedom - A New Synthesis for Archeological Explanation. American Anthropologist, 93(3), 551-569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1991.93.3.02a00010

Wargo, M. C. (2009). The Bordes-Binford Debate: Transatlantic Interpretive Traditions in Paleolithic Archaeology. University of Texas, Arlington.

Williams, T. J., & Madsen, D. B. (2020). The Upper Paleolithic of the Americas. PaleoAmerica, 6(1), 4-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2019.1606668

Wilmsen, E. N., & Robert, F. H. J. (1978). Lindenmeier, 1934-1974: Concluding report on investigations. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.24.1

Yerkes, R. W., & Kardulias, P. N. (1993). Recent developments in the analysis of lithic artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Research, 1(2), 89-119. doi:10.1007/BF01326933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326933

Descargas

Publicado

2023-04-28

Cómo citar

Potter, B., & Sellet, F. . (2023). Una historia de los estudios tecnológicos líticos en la arqueología paleoindia en los Estados Unidos de América. Revista Del Museo De Antropología, 16(1), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v16.n1.38778

Número

Sección

Dossier: Enfoques clásicos y contemporáneos para el análisis de artefactos líticos arqueológicos en América del Sur