Exploring the connection between problem solving and conceptual understanding in Physics

Authors

  • Jason W. Morphew
  • José P. Mestre

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55767/2451.6007.v30.n2.22738

Keywords:

Worked examples, Problem-solving, Conceptual understanding

Abstract


This study probes whether problem solving ability is indicative of an understanding of the concepts underlying problem solutions. Low-performing students enrolled in an introductory mechanics course for scientists and engineers viewed an animated-narrated solution to a difficult problem in angular dynamics as preparation for an upcoming midterm exam. Immediately after viewing the solution, the students attempted to solve an isomorphic calculation-based problem and a conceptual question that probed whether students understood the concepts underlying the solution to the calculation-based problem. We found that ability to solve the calculation-based problem did not correlate with conceptual understanding. This suggests that, at least for low-performing students, problem solving and conceptual understanding in physics are different types of knowledge that develop independently, and as such, instruction should focus on the development of both types of knowledge rather than assuming that proficiency in solving complicated problems is indicative of conceptual understanding.

References

Blasiman, R. N., Dunlosky, J., y Rawson, K. A. (2017). The what, how much, and when of study strate-gies: Comparing intended versus actual study behavior. Memory, 25, 781-792. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1221974

Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J. y Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.

Docktor, J.L. y Mestre, J.P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 10, (58pp). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119

Feil, A. y Mestre, J.P.(2010). Change Blindness as a Means of Studying Expertise in Physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(4), 480-505.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., Wenderoth, M.P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.

Hake, R. (1998).Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of me-chanics’ test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64-74.

Hartwig, M. K., y Dunlosky, J. (2012). Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 126-134. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0181

Kryjevskaia, M., Stetzer, M.R., y Le, T.K. (2014). Failure to engage: Examining the impact of metacogni-tive interventions on persistent intuitive reasoning approaches. In P. V. Engelhardt, A. D. Churukian, and D. L. Jones (Eds.), 2014 PERC Proceedings (pp. 143-146). Minneapolis, MN, July 30-31. doi:10.1119/perc.2014.pr.032

Mayer, R.E. y Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Education-al Psychologist, 38, 43-52.

Mayer, R.E. (2011). Applying the science of learning to multimedia instruction. In J.P. Mestre y B.H. Ross (Eds.), The Psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education, Vol. 55 (pp. 78-108). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Mazur, E.(1997).Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Mestre, J.P. (2002). Probing adults’ conceptual understanding and transfer of learning via problem pos-ing. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 9-50.

Mestre, J.P. (Ed.) (2005). Transfer of Learning from a Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective (393 págs.). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Scott, M., Stelzer, T. y Gladding, G. (2006). Evaluating multiple-choice exams in large introductory physics courses. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 2, (14 pp). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.020102

Stelzer, T., Brookes, D., Gladding, G., y Mestre, J. (2010). Impact of multimedia learning module on an introductory course on electricity and magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 78(7), 755-759. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3369920

Stelzer, T., Gladding, G., Mestre, J. y Brookes, D.T. (2009).Comparing the efficacy of multimedia mod-ules with traditional textbooks for learning introductory physics content. American Journal of Physics, 77(2), 184-190. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3028204

Published

2018-12-18

How to Cite

Morphew, J. W., & Mestre, J. P. (2018). Exploring the connection between problem solving and conceptual understanding in Physics. Journal of Physics Teaching, 30(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.55767/2451.6007.v30.n2.22738