Results in physics education research as lenses for analyzing textbooks, recognizing critical details and fostering thinking. The case of teaching/learning special relativity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55767/2451.6007.v26.n1.9514Keywords:
Special Relativity, Textbooks, Original papers, Teaching and LearningAbstract
The teaching of special relativity, both at the secondary school level and at the university level, is still strongly influenced by the approach designed by Resnick in 1968. This approach follows in some way the 1905 original paper of Einstein on “The electrodynamics of moving bodies” and it is still orienting, more or less explicitly, textbooks’ authors.In this paper I analyze how the educational tradition progressively transformed the presentation of the theory, from the original article to the current textbooks. In particular, I will show how such a transformation has progressively disregarded both critical details needed for understanding, and that interpretative dimension needed for making the approach comparable to other possible ones and, hence, needed for perceiving the cultural meaning of the theory.
The analysis is carried out using results in Physics Education Research (PER) as lenses and it is intended to provide teachers with tips for reading in the lines of textbooks and for recognizing some implicit interpretative choices.
References
Adler, C.G. (1987). Does mass really depend on velocity, dad?. Am. J. Phys., 55(8), 739-743.
Bertozzi, E. & Levrini, O. (2014). Symmetry as conceptual core of the standard model of physics: Actions for science education, Symmetry: Culture and Science, 25(3), 279-287.
Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The Logic of Modern Physics. New York: Macmillan.
Bridgman, P. W. (1949). Einstein's Theories and the Operational Point of View, in P. A. Schilpp, ed., Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist (La Salle, Illinois: Open Court), 333-354.
De Ambrosis, A. & Levrini, O. (2010). How physics teachers approach innovation: An empirical study for reconstructing the appropriation path in the case of special relativity. Physical Review Special Topics -Physics Education Research, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020107.
diSessa, A. A. & Sherin, B. L. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155-1191.
Einstein, A. (1905). Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Korper, Annalen der Physik, XVII, pp. 891-921 (On the electrodynamics of moving bodies, in Lorentz, H. A., Einstein, A., Minkowski, H., Weyl, H.: 1952, The principle of relativity. A collection of original memoirs on the special and general theory of relativity. (with notes by A. Sommerfeld) Dover Publications, New York, pp.37-65).
Einstein, A. (1949). Autobiographic Writings, in Schilpp, Albert Einstein as philosopher and scientist.
Galison, P. (2003). Einstein's Clocks, Poincaré's Maps. Empires of Time. New York: W.W. Norton.
Giancoli, G. D. (2004). Physics: Principles with Applications (6th Edition). Pearson Prentice Hall
Hewson, P.W. (1982). A case study of conceptual change in special relativity. The influence of prior knowledge in learning. European Journal of Science Education, 4(61), 61 78.
Halliday D., Resnick R., Walker J. (1997). Fundamentals of Physics. J. Wiley & Sons, Inc.).
Holton, G. (1973). Thematic origins of scientific thought, Kepler to Einstein, Harvard University press, Cambridge (MA), London (England) (revised version 1988).
Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962
Levrini, O. (1999). Relatività ristretta e concezioni di spazio, Giornale di fisica, XL, 4, 205-220.
Levrini, O. (2002). The substantivalist view of spacetime proposed by Minkowski and its educational implications. Science & Education, 11(6), 601-617.
Levrini, O. (2014). The Role of History and Philosophy in Research on Teaching and Learning of Relativity. In M. R. Matthews (ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, Springer Netherlands, 157-181.
Levrini, O. & diSessa, A.A. (2008). How students learn from multiple contexts and definitions: Proper time as a coordination class. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010107.
Levrini, O., Fantini, P. (2013). Encountering Productive Forms of Complexity in Learning Modern Physics. Science & Education, DOI: 10.1007/s11191-013-9587-4
Levrini, O., Fantini P., Pecori B., Tasquier G., Levin, M. (2014). Defining and Operationalizing ‘Appropriation’ for Science Learning, Journal of the Learning Sciences, DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2014.928215
Minkowski, H. (1909). Raum und Zeit, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 10, No.3, 104-111 (Space and Time, in Lorentz, H. A., Einstein, A., Minkowski, H., Weyl, H.: 1952, The principle of relativity. A collection of original memoirs on the special and general theory of relativity. (with notes by A. Sommerfeld) Dover Publications, New York, pp.73-96).
Minsky, M. L. (1986). The Society of Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Poincaré, H. (1898). La mesure du temps, Revue de métaphysique et de morale 6: 1-13.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W. & Gerzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
Resnick, R. (1968). Introduction to Special Relativity, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, London.
Scherr, R. E., Shaffer, P. S. & Vokos, S. (2001). Student understanding of time in special relativity: Simultaneity and references frames. American Journal of Physics, 69(7), S24 S35.
Scherr, R. E., Shaffer, P. S. & Vokos, S. (2002). The challenge of changing deeply held student beliefs about relativity of simultaneity. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1238 1248.
Shankland, R. S., (1964). Michelson-Morley experiment. Am. J. Phys. 32(1), 16-35;
Shankland, R. S. (1973). Michelson's role in the development of relativity. Applied Optics, 12(10), 2280;
Shankland R. S. (1973). Conversations with Einstein. Am. J. Physics 41(7), 895-901
Sutton C., Beliefs about science and beliefs about language, Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol.18, no.1, 1-18, 1996.
Taylor, E. F. & Wheeler, J. A. (1965). Spacetime Physics, Freeman and Company, New York (2nd. Edition 1992).
Viennot, L., Chauvet, F., Colin, P. & Rebmann, G. (2005). Designing strategies and tools for teacher training: the role of critical details, examples in optics. Science Education, 89(1), 13-27.
Warren, J. W. (1976). The mystery of mass-energy, Physics Education, 11(1), 52-54.
Whitaker, M. (1976). Definitions of mass in special relativity, Physics Education, 11(1), 55-57.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Olivia Levrini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de copiar y redistribuir el material, bajo los términos estipulados en la Licencia de reconocimiento, no comercial, sin obras derivadas de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra bajo las siguientes condiciones:
- Reconocimiento — Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.
- NoComercial — No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial.
- SinObraDerivada — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
