Formatos de Respuesta en la Evaluación de la Autoeficacia para la Escritura: Una Mayor Discriminación Incrementa la Capacidad de Predicción

Frank Pajares; James  Hartley; Gio Valiante

doi:10.35670/1667-4545.v3.n1.604

Autores/as

Frank Pajares Emory University.
James Hartley Keele University, England. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6461-3266
Gio Valiante Emory University.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v3.n1.604

Palabras clave:

autoeficacia, escritura, escalas

Resumen

En el presente trabajo, se compararon dos escalas de autoeficacia para la redacción con diferente formato de respuesta. La escala con un formato 0-100 fue psicométricamente más fuerte que la escala con un formato tradicional Likert.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.

Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman.

Hackett, G. (1995). Self-efficacy in career choice and development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 232-258). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics selfefficacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 261-273.

Jöreskog, K. G., & Lawley, D. N. (1968). New methods in maximum likelihood factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 21, 85-96.

Lent, R. W., & Hackett, G. (1987). Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30, 347-382.

Marsh, H. W. (1990). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh-Shavelson Model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 623-636.

Maurer, T. J., & Pierce, H. R. (1998). A comparison of Likert scale and traditional measures of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 324-329.

McCarthy, P., Meier, S., & Rinderer, R. (1985). Self-efficacy and writing. College Composition and Communication, 36, 465-471.

Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents' course enrollment and performance in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60-70.

Meier, S., McCarthy, P. R., & Schmeck, R. R. (1984). Validity of self-efficacy as a predictor of writing performance. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8, 107-120.

Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718.

Pajares, F., & Johnson, M. J. (1994). Confidence and competence in writing: The role of writing self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 28, 313-331.

Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction, Second edition. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Pajares, F., Miller, M. D., & Johnson, M. J. (1999). Gender differences in writing selfbeliefs of elementary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology. 91, 50-61.

Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1997). The predictive and mediational role of the writing self-efficacy beliefs of upper elementary students. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 353-360.

Rowell, R. K. (1996). Partitioning predicted variance into constituent parts: How to conduct regression commonality analysis. In B. Thompson (Ed.). Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 4, pp. 33-43). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

SAS Institute, Inc. (1989). SAS/STAT users guide, version 6, fourth edition, volume 1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

Seegers, G., & Boekaerts, M. (1996). Gender-related differences in self-referenced cognitions in relation to mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 215-240.

Shell, D. F., Colvin, C., & Bruning, R. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, attributions, and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement: Grade-level and achievement-level differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 386-398.

Shell, D. F., Murphy, C. C., & Bruning, R. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 91-100.

Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1989). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thompson, B., & Borello, G. M. (1985). The importance of structure coefficients in regression research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 203-209.

Williams, E. J. (1959). The comparison of regression variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 21, 396-399.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.