Invarianza longitudinal del IPAE en escolares españoles de primer curso de primaria

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v23.n1.41003

Palabras clave:

habilidades de transcripción, educación primaria, escritura, invarianza factorial longitudinal, medida basada en el currículo

Resumen

Se realizó un estudio para analizar la estructura factorial y la invarianza longitudinal de medida de los Indicadores de Progreso de Aprendizaje en Escritura (IPAE) como medición basada en el currículo en estudiantes españoles de 1º grado. El modelo propuesto es de un factor en el que las cinco tareas del IPAE (i.e., escritura de alógrafos, dictado de palabras con ortografía arbitraria, dictado de palabras con ortografía reglada, dictado de pseudopalabras y dictado de frases) sirven como indicadores observables para un solo factor subyacente (i.e., transcripción). El IPAE está compuesto de tres formas paralelas (i.e., A, B y C), y se administró en tres ocasiones diferentes a 231 estudiantes españoles de primer grado durante el año escolar (inicio, medio y fin). Se concluye que el IPAE presenta una adecuada validez de constructo y equivalencia de medida que permite evaluar la habilidad de transcripción en primer grado a lo largo del tiempo.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Juan E. Jiménez, Universidad de La Laguna

Catedrático de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación. Facultad de Psicología y Logopedia de la Universidad de La Laguna. Coordinador del grupo de investigación “Dificultades de Aprendizaje, Psicolingüísticas y Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación” (https://ejimenez.webs.ull.es)

Eduardo García, Universidad de La Laguna

Contratado Doctor. Facultad de Psicología y Logopedia de la Universidad de La Laguna.

Citas

Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Fayol, M. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in Grades 1 to 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 281-298. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019318

Arfé, B., Dockrell, J. E., & De Bernardi, B. (2016). The effect of language specific factors on early written composition: The role of spelling, oral language and text generation skills in a shallow orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(3), 501-527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9617-5

Babayiğit, S., & Stainthorp, R. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling and narrative writing skills in Turkish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23(5), 539-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9173-y

Berninger, V. W. (1994). Intraindividual differences in levels of language in comprehension of written sentences. Learning and Individual Differences, 6(4), 433-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(94)90004-3

Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Augsburger, A., & García, N. (2009). Comparison of pen and keyboard transcription modes in children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(3), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.2307/27740364

Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Jones, J., Wolf, B. J., Gould, L., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., Shimada, S., & Apel, K. (2006). Early development of language by hand: Composing, reading, listening, and speaking connections; three letter-writing modes; and fast mapping in spelling. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29(1), 61-92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2901_5

Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Whitaker, D., Sylvester, L., & Nolen, S. B. (1995). Integrating low- and high-level skills in instructional protocols for writing disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18(4), 293-309. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511235

Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. En E. C. Butterfield, & J. Carlson (Eds.), Advances in Cognition and Educational Practice (Vol. 2, pp. 57-81). JAI Press.

Berninger, V., & Winn, W. D. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. En C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96-114). The Guilford Press.

Berninger, V., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R., Begay, K., Coleman, K., Curtin, G., Hawkins, J., & Graham, S. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 291-304. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.291

Berninger, V., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., & Abbott, R. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 257-280.

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org//10.1080/10705510701301834

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Aiken, L., & West, S. G. (1999). The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34(3), 315-346. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_2

Dombek, J. L., & Al Otaiba, S. (2016). Curriculumbased measurement for beginning writers (K-2). Intervention in School and Clinic, 51(5), 276-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345121560669

Foegen, A., Jiban, C., & Deno, S. (2007). Progress monitoring measures in mathematics: A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410020101

Gil, V., de León, S. C., & Jiménez, J. E. (2021). Universal screening for writing risk in Spanish-speaking firstgraders. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 37(2), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1733451

Graham, S., Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.170

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445-476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445

Guzmán, R., & Jiménez, J. E. (2001). Estudio normativo sobre parámetros psicolingüísticos en niños de 6 a 8 años: La familiaridad subjetiva. Cognitiva, 13(2), 153-191. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/revista?codigo=295

Jiménez, J. E. (2017). Early Grade Writing Assessment (EGWA): An instrument model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(5), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416633127

Jiménez, J. E. (2018). Early Grade Writing Assessment (EGWA): A report on development of an instrument. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/inicio

Jiménez, J. E., & de León, S. C. (2017). Análisis factorial confirmatorio del IPAM en escolares de tercer curso de primaria. Revista Evaluar, 17(2), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v17.n2.18723

Jiménez, J. E., & Gil, V. (2019). IPAE: Indicadores de Progreso de Aprendizaje en Escritura [material complementario]. En J. E. Jiménez (Ed.), Modelo de respuesta a la intervención. Un enfoque preventivo para el abordaje de las dificultades de aprendizaje (pp. 1051-1060). Pirámide.

Jiménez, J. E., & Hernández-Cabrera, J. A. (2019). Transcription skills and written composition in Spanish beginning writers: Pen and keyboard modes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(7), 1847-1879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9928-4

Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437-447. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437

Juel, C., Griffith, P., & Gough, P. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243

Kim, Y-. S., Al Otaiba, S., Puranik, C., Folsom, J. S., Greulich, L., & Wagner, R. K. (2011). Componential skills of beginning writing: An exploratory study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 517-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2011.06.004

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2da ed.). Guilford Press.

Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2013). Modeling writing development: Contribution of transcription and self-regulation to Portuguese students’ text generation quality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 401-413. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031391

Longcamp, M., Zerbato-Poudou, M. T., & Velay, J-. L. (2005). The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Acta Psychologica, 119(1), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.019

Mäki, H. S., Voeten, M. J. M., Vauras, M. M. S., & Poskiparta, E. H. (2001). Predicting writing skill development with word recognition and preschool readiness skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(7-8), 643-672. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012071514719

McMaster, K. L., & Campbell, H. (2008). Technical features of new and existing measures of written expression: An examination within and across grade levels. School Psychology Review, 37, 550-566.

McMaster, K., & Espin, C. (2007). Technical features of curriculum-based measurement in writing: A literature review. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410020301

Milfont, T., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.857

Newsom, J. T. (2015). Longitudinal structural equation modeling: A comprehensive introduction. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Puranik, C. S., & AlOtaiba, S. (2012). Examining the contribution of handwriting and spelling to written expression in kindergarten children. Reading and Writing, 25(7), 1523-1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9331-x

R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org

Rojas-Torres, L., Rojas-Rojas, G., & Brizuela-Rodríguez, A. (2018). El uso de la invarianza de medición con variables dicotómicas como evidencia de validez. Revista Evaluar, 18(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v18.n2.20807

Rossell, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2014). Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(1), 31-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413498257

Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2017). Measurement invariance in international surveys: Categorical indicators and fit measure performance. Applied Measurement in Education, 30(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1243540

Svetina, D., & Rutkowski, L. (2017). Multidimensional measurement invariance in an international context: Fit measure performance with many groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(7), 991-1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117717028

Wayman, M. M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H. I., Tichá, R., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 85-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410020401

Descargas

Publicado

2023-04-26

Cómo citar

Jiménez, J. E., & García, E. (2023). Invarianza longitudinal del IPAE en escolares españoles de primer curso de primaria. Revista Evaluar, 23(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v23.n1.41003

Número

Sección

Investigaciones originales