Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario sobre la Exposición Corporal durante la Actividad Sexual en estudiantes universitarios mexicanos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v22.n1.37417Palabras clave:
psicometría, validez factorial, medición de invarianza, imagen corporal, exposición del cuerpo, universitariosResumen
El objetivo fue evaluar las propiedades psicométricas de la versión en español del Cuestionario sobre la Exposición Corporal durante la Actividad Sexual. Un total de 997 universitarios (718 mujeres y 279 hombres), de 18 a 35 años de edad (M = 23.76; DE = 4.45), fueron asignados aleatoriamente a tres muestras (n1 = 333; n2 = 335; n3 = 329). El análisis factorial exploratorio identificó una estructura de dos factores que explican el 49.85% de la varianza. El análisis factorial confirmatorio mostró índices de bondad y ajuste adecuados para este modelo (RMSEA = .067; SRMR = .049; CFI = .931; TLI = .922). Además, se confirmó la invarianza por estatus de peso. La consistencia interna y la estabilidad temporal fueron excelentes. La exposición corporal durante la actividad sexual se asoció positivamente con la estima corporal y con la satisfacción sexual. Se concluye que el BESAQ es un instrumento bidimensional válido y confiable para evaluar la exposición del cuerpo durante las relaciones sexuales en estudiantes universitarios mexicanos.
Descargas
Referencias
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781118619179
Bossio, J. A., & Pukall, C. F. (2018). Attitude toward one’s circumcision status is more important than actual circumcision status for men’s body image and sexual functioning. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(3), 771-781. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1064-8
Boyer, S. C., & Pukall, C. F. (2014). Pelvic examination experiences in women with and without chronic pain during intercourse. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11(12), 3035-3050. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12701
Brennan, M. A., Lalonde, C. E., & Bain, J. L. (2010). Body image perceptions: Do gender differences exist? Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 15(3), 130- 138. doi: 10.24839/1089-4136.JN15.3.130
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258. doi: 10.1177/0049124192021002005
Cash, T. F. (1994). The Situational Inventory of Body-Image Dysphoria: Contextual assessment of a negative body image. The Behavior Therapist, 17, 133-134. Retrieved from https://www.abct.org/journals/the-behavior-therapist-journal
Cash, T. F., Fleming, E. C., Alindogan, J., Steadman, L., & Whitehead, A. (2002). Beyond body image as a trait: The development and validation of the Body Image States Scale. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 10(2), 103-113. doi: 10.1080/10640260290081678
Cash, T. F., Maikkula, C. L., & Yamamiya, Y. (2004). “Barring the body in the bedroom”: Body image, sexual self-schemas, and sexual functioning among college women and men. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 7, 1-8. Retrieved from http://www.ejhs.org
Cash, T. F., & Pruzinsky, T. (Eds.). (2002). Body image: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. New York, NY: Guilford.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness of fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233-255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284-290. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
Claudat, K., & Warren, C. S. (2014). Self-objectification, body self-consciousness during sexual activities, and sexual satisfaction in college women. Body Image, 11(4), 509-515. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.07.006
Claudat, K., Warren, C. S., & Durette, R. T. (2012). The relationships between body surveillance, body shame, and contextual body concern during sexual activities in ethnically diverse female college students. Body Image, 9(4), 448-454. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.05.007
Creanga, C., Lacatusu, L., Anastasiu, D.-M., & Lungeanu, D. (2014, 4th-5th of June). Validation of scoring instruments in obstetrics-gynaecology [Poster]. RoMedINF Annual Conference of the Romanian Society of Medical Informatics, Bucharest, Rumanía. Retrieved form http://www.srimed.ro/pagini/Romedinf.html
Dinc, H., & Beji, N. K. (2017). Cultural adaptation, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Turkish version of the Body Exposure during Sexual Activities Questionnaire. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 10(3), 1178-1186. Retrieved from http://www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org
Domínguez-Lara, S. A., & Merino-Soto, C. M. (2015). ¿Por qué es importante reportar los intervalos de confianza del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach? [Why is it important to report the confidence intervals of the Cronbach ´s alpha coefficient?]. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 13(2), 1326-1328. Retrieved from http://revistaumanizales.cinde.org.co/rlcsnj/index.php/Revista-Latinoamericana
Escoto-Ponce de León, M. del C., Bosques-Brugada, L. E., Cervantes-Luna, B. S., Camacho-Ruiz, E. J., Díaz-Rangel, I., & Rodríguez-Hernández, G. (2016). Adaptation and psychometric properties of Body Esteem Scale in Mexican women and men. Revista Mexicana de Trastornos Alimentarios, 7(2), 97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.rmta.2016.08.001
Faith, M. S., & Schare, M. L. (1993). The role of body image in sexually avoidant behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22(4), 345-356. doi: 10.1007/BF01542123
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: Origins, development and future directions. Psicothema, 29(2), 236-240. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.304
Flores-Perez, V., Camacho-Ruiz, E. J., Escoto-Ponce de León, M. del C., Cervantes-Luna, B. S., & Ibarra-Espinosa, M. L. (2021). Measurement invariance of the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale short form. Revista Evaluar, 21(1), 94-103. doi: 10.35670/1667-4545.v21.n1.32835
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104
Franzoi, S. L., & Shields, S. A. (1984). The Body Esteem Scale: Multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(2), 173-178. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4802_12
Guilford, J. P. (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Mc-Graw-Hill.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hangen, J. D., & Cash, T. F. (1991, November). The relationships of body-image attitudes to sexual functioning and experiences in a normal college population [Poster]. Annual Meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, New York, United States.
Holt, A., & Lyness, K. P. (2007). Body image and sexual satisfaction. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 6(3), 45-68. doi: 10.1300/J398v06n03_03
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185. doi: 10.1007/BF02289447
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
IBM Corporation. (2010). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (Version 19.0) [Software]. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/mx-es
Jiménez-Ortiz, D., Sánchez-Cardona, I., & Pérez-Pedrogo, C. (2020). Psychometric properties of the OBSC Body Shame Scale in a sample of female residents in Puerto Rico. Revista Evaluar, 20(3), 20-33. Retrieved from https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revaluar/index
La Rocque, C. L., & Cioe, J. (2011). An evaluation of the relationship between body image and sexual avoidance. Journal of Sex Research, 48(4), 397-408. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2010.499522
Landis, R. J., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. doi: 10.2307/2529310
Lowder, J. L., Ghetti, C., Moalli, P., Zyczynski, H., & Cash, T. F. (2010). Body image in women before and after reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. International Urogynecology Journal, 21(8), 919-925. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1141-1
Maillé, D. L., Bergeron, S., & Lambert, B. (2015). Body image in women with primary and secondary provoked vestibulodynia: A controlled study. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(2), 505-515. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12765
Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519-530. doi: 10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified approach. New York, NY: Psychology. doi: 10.4324/9781410601087
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus (Version 8.7) [Software]. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com
Nowosielski, K., Kurpisz, J., & Kowalczyk, R. (2019). Body image during sexual activity in the population of Polish adult women. Menopause Review, 18(4), 198-209. doi: 10.5114/pm.2019.93118
Penhollow, T. M., & Young, M. (2008). Predictors of sexual satisfaction: The role of body image and fitness. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 11, 1-14. Retrieved from https://rc.library.uta.edu/uta-ir/handle/10106/24331
Ramada-Rodilla, J. M., Serra-Pujadas, C., & Delclós-Clanchet, G. L. (2013). Adaptación cultural y validación de cuestionarios de salud: Revisión y recomendaciones metodológicas [Cross-cultural adaptation and health questionnaires validation: Revision and methodological recommendations]. Salud Pública de México, 55(1), 57-66. doi: 10.1590/S0036-36342013000100009
Reichenheim, M. E., & Moraes, C. L. (2007). Operacionalização de adaptação transcultural de instrumentos de aferição usados em epidemiologia [Operationalizing the cross-cultural adaptation of epidemiological measurement instruments]. Revista de Saúde Pública, 41(4), 665-673. doi: 10.1590/S0034-89102006005000035
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23-74. Retrieved from https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/mpr_Schermelleh.pdf
Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107-120. doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
Štulhofer, A., Buško, V., & Brouillard, P. (2011). The New Sexual Satisfaction Scale and its short form. In T. D. Fisher, C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (3rd ed., pp. 530-533). New York, NY: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315881089
Swami, V., & Barron, D. (2019). Translation and validation of body image instruments: Challenges, good practice guidelines, and reporting recommendations for test adaptation. Body image, 31, 204-220. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.014
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). London, UK: Pearson.
Thompson, J. K., & Schaefer, L. M. (2019). Thomas F. Cash: A multidimensional innovator in the measurement of body image; Some lessons learned and some lessons for the future of the field. Body Image, 31, 198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.08.006
Weir, J. P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(1), 231-240. doi: 10.1519/15184.1
Woods, L., Hevey, D., Ryall, N., & O’Keeffe, F. (2018). Sex after amputation: The relationships between sexual functioning, body image, mood and anxiety in persons with a lower limb amputation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40(14), 1663-1670. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1306585
World Medical Association. (1964). Declaration of Helsinki. Retrieved from https://www.wma.net
Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806-838. doi: 10.1177/0011000006288127
Yamamiya, Y., Cash, T. F., & Thompson, J. K. (2006). Sexual experiences among college women: The differential effects of general versus contextual body images on sexuality. Sex Roles, 55(5-6), 421-427. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9096-x
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Virginia Flores-Perez, Esteban Jaime Camacho-Ruiz, María del Consuelo Escoto-Ponce de León, Brenda Sarahi Cervantes-Luna, Lilián Elizabeth Bosques-Brugada
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Revista Evaluar aplica la Licencia Internacional de Atribuciones Comunes Creativas (Creative Commons Attribution License, CCAL). Bajo esta licencia, los autores retienen la propiedad de copyright de los artículos pero permiten que, sin que medie permiso de autor o editor, cualquier persona descargue y distribuya los artículos publicados en Evaluar. La única condición es que siempre y en todos los casos se cite a los autores y a la fuente original de publicación (i.e. Evaluar). El envío de artículos a Evaluar y la lectura de los mismos es totalmente gratuito.
