If there is no fantasme, there is anguish in the lack of lack: particularity in psychosis.

Authors

  • Alejandro Godoy Universidad de Estrasburgo - Francia

Keywords:

fantasme, joissance, psychosis, missing

Abstract

Regarding the conceptualization of anguish, Lacan seems to speak focused on reference to neurosis, What then is the development of this concept referred to the psychotic structure? What is its particularity in defensive modes and its relationship with keywords "Jouissance", "fantasme", "lack"?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lacan, J. (1981) Le séminaire, Livre III, Les psychoses, Paris : Seuil.

Lacan, J. [1958-1959] (1986) Le séminaire, Livre VI, Le désir et son interprétation, Paris: Seuil.

Lacan, J. [1962-1963] (2004) Le Séminaire, Livre X, L’angoisse , Paris : Seuil.

Lefort, R. (1994) L'Autre et l'objet dans la psychose, in Pas tant (n°23), pp. 11-23.

Miller, J. A, (1982-1983) Du symptôme au fantasme et retour. Disponible en : https://jonathanleroy.be/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/1982-1983-Du-sympt%c3%b4me-au-fantasme-et-retour-JA-Miller.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-11-15

How to Cite

Godoy, A. (2022). If there is no fantasme, there is anguish in the lack of lack: particularity in psychosis . Pathos, 4, 50–60. Retrieved from https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pathos/article/view/37486

Issue

Vol. 4 (2022): Anguish

Section

Dossier

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Alejandro Godoy

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Attribution - Non-Commercial - Share Alike (by-nc-sa): No commercial use of the original work or any derivative works is permitted, distribution of which must be under a license equal to that governing the original work.