The investment of theory in ethnography in social anthropology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v13.n2.25508Keywords:
Social anthropology, Ethnography, Theory, Methodology, Ethnographic perspectiveAbstract
In this article I analyze how theory operates in ethnographic research in social and/or cultural anthropology. I argue that ethnography involves the deployment of certain analytical procedures that lead to the relativization of theory —and, eventually, to its reformulation— through its confrontation with ethnographic materials: the dynamic integration of the native perspectives in the analysis; the combination of holism, the restriction of the preselection of ethnographic materials, and their strict contextualization; and various uses of comparison. Next, I illustrate this statement by showing how my ethnographies of the conflicts between the members of a fishermen’s cooperative and of the Peronist concept of ‘loyalty’ gave rise to some theoretical developments around the analysis of the moral dimension of social life. Finally, I suggest that these procedures are the correlate at the level of methodology of the ‘ethnographic perspective’ —a very general theory about the nature of social life that has been developed throughout the history of the discipline.
Downloads
References
Archetti, E. (1997). The moralities of argentinian football. En: Howell, S. (ed.). The ethnography of moralities (pp. 99-125). London and New York: Routledge.
Balbi, F. A. (2017a): Servidumbre y emancipación de la comparación. En Balbi, F. A. (Ed.), La comparación en Antropología Social: problemas y perspectivas (pp. 29-76). Buenos Aires: Editorial Antropofagia.
Balbi, F. A. (2017b). Comparación, etnografía y generalización. Anuário Antropológico (42)1: 9-35. doi: 10.4000/aa.1628
Balbi, F. A. (2017c). Moral e interés. Una perspectiva antropológica. PUBLICAR en Antropología y Ciencias Sociales, Año XIV, No. XXIII: 9-30. Recuperado de http://ppct.caicyt.gov.ar/index.php/publicar/article/view/11710/45454575757808
Balbi, F. A. (2016). A moral como parte integral da produção da vida social. Uma leitura heterodoxa dos escritos de Emile Durkheim. Sociologia & Antropologia, 6(3): 755-778. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2238-38752016v638
Balbi, F. A. (2015). Retratistas de mariposas. Acerca del lugar subordinado de la comparación en la antropología social y cultural contemporánea. Revista del Museo de Antropología, 8(1): 171-186. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v8.n1.9516
Balbi, F. A. (2012). La integración dinámica de las ‘perspectivas nativas’ en la investigación etnográfica. Intersecciones en Antropología, 14: 485-499. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=179525429013
Balbi, F. A. (2007). De leales, desleales y traidores. Valor moral y concepción de política en el peronismo. Buenos Aires: Editorial Antropofagia.
Balbi, F. A. (2000). Interdependencia, memoria institucional y valores morales: fundamentos sociales de la moralidad en una cooperativa de pescadores entrerrianos. Avá. Revista de Antropología Social, 2: 95-111.
Bachelard, G. (1979). El racionalismo aplicado. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Barth, F. (1975). Ritual and knowledge among the Baktaman of New Guinea. Oslo-New Haven: Universitetsforlaget-Yale University Press.
Bloch, M. (2005). Where did anthropology go? Or the need for ‘human nature’. Essays on cultural transmission, (1-19). Oxford: Berg.
Boivin, M., Rosato, A. y Balbi, F. A. (eds.). 2008: Calando la vida. Ambiente y pesca artesanal en el Delta entrerriano. Buenos Aires: Editorial Antropofagia.
Boivin, M., Rosato, A. y Balbi, F. A. (1999). Conflictos políticos y valores morales: usos simbólicos del modelo cooperativista. Etnía, 43: 171-188.
Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J. y Passeron, J. (1986). El oficio de sociólogo. México: Siglo XXI.
Cook, J. (11 de mayo de 2016). Ethnography: Translation [Correspondences, Cultural Anthropology website]. Recuperado de https://culanth.org/fieldsights/874-ethnography-translation
Da Col, G. (2017). Two or three things I know about ethnographic theory. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7(1): 1–8. doi: 10.14318/hau7.1.002
Da Col, G. y Graeber, D. (2011). Foreword: The return of ethnographic theory. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 1(1): vi-xxxv. doi: 10.14318/hau1.1.001
Das, V., Jackson, M., Kleinman, A. y Singh, B. (2014). Introduction. Experiments between Anthropology and Philosophy: Affinities and antagonisms. En Das, V., Jackson, M., Kleinman, A. y Singh, B. (Eds.), The Ground Between. Anthropologists engage philosophy (pp. 1-26). Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Ellen, R. (2010). Theories in anthropology and ‘anthropological theory’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 16(2): 387-404. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/40606106
Ellen, R. (1984). Introduction. En Ellen, R. F. (Ed.), Ethnographic research. A guide to general conduct (pp. 1-12). London: Academic Press.
Escobar, A. y Restrepo, E. (2005). “Otras antropologías y antropologías de otro modo”: elementos para una red de antropologías del mundo. En: Escobar, E., Más allá del Tercer Mundo. Globalización y Diferencia (pp. 231-256). Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia.
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1977). Los Nuer. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Fox, R. G. y Gingrich, A. (2002). Introduction. En Gingrich, A. y Fox, R. G. (Eds.), Anthropology, by comparison (pp. 1-24). London and New York: Routledge.
Fortes, M. (1945). The dynamics of clanship among the Tallensi. London: International African Institute - Oxford University Press.
Fortes, M. y Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1979). Sistemas políticos africanos. En Llobera, J. (comp.), Antropología política (pp. 85-105) Barcelona: Anagrama.
Godelier, M. (1986). La producción de Grandes Hombres. Poder y dominación masculina entre los Baruya de Nueva Guinea. Marid: Akal.
Godelier, M. (1989). Lo ideal y lo material. Pensamiento, economías, sociedades. Madrid: Taurus.
Guber, R. (2016). Conocimiento antropológico, trabajo de campo y patetismo editorial. Cuestión de escala y de tiempo. [En sus propios términos. World Council of Anthropological associations website]. Recuperado de https://www.wcaanet.org/publications/propios_terminos/guber.shtml
Guber, R. (1991). El salvaje metropolitano. Buenos Aires: Legasa.
Gupta, A. y Ferguson, J. (1997). Discipline and practice: “The field” as site, method, and location in Anthropology. En: Gupta, A. y Ferguson, J. (Eds.), Anthropological locations : boundaries and grounds of a field science (pp. 1-46). Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
Hastrup, K. (2005). Social anthropology. Towards a pragmatic enlightenment? Social Anthropology, 13(2), 133–149. doi: 10.1017/S0964028205001199
Hastrup, K. (1997). The dynamics of anthropological theory. Cultural Dynamics, 9(3), 351-371. doi: 10.1177/092137409700900305
Holy, L. (1984). Theory, methodology and the research process. En Ellen, R. F. (Ed.), Ethnographic research. A guide to general conduct (pp. 13-35). London: Academic Press.
Howell, S. (2018). Ethnography. En The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Recuperado de http://doi.org/10.29164/18ethno
Howell, S. (2017). Two or three things I love about ethnography. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7(1): 15-20. doi: 10.14318/hau7.1.004
Ingold, T. (2017). ¡Suficiente con la etnografía! Revista Colombiana de Antropología, 53(2): 143-159. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=105052402007
Ingold, T. (2008). Anthropology is not ethnography. Proceedings of the British Academy, 154: 69-92. doi: 10.5871/bacad/9780197264355.001.0001
Kuper, A. (2002). Comparison and contextualization: reflections on South Africa. En Gingrich, A. y Fox, R. G. (Eds.), op. cit. (pp. 143-166).
Marcus, G. (25 de mayo de 2016). Ethnography: Integration. [Correspondences, Cultural Anthropology website]. Recuperado de https://culanth.org/fieldsights/879-ethnography-integration
MacDougall, S. (11 de mayo de 2016). Let’s keep ethnography, and talk more about how it’s done. [Correspondences, Cultural Anthropology website]. Recuperado de https://culanth.org/fieldsights/877-ethnography-deviation
Melhuus, M. (2002). Issues of relevance: anthropology and the challenges of cross-cultural comparison. En Gingrich, A. y Fox, R. G. (Eds.), op. cit. (pp. 70-91).
Miller, D. (2017). Anthropology is the discipline but the goal is ethnography. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7(1): 27-31. doi: 10.14318/hau7.1.006
Nader, L. (2011). Ethnography as theory. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 1(1): 211-219. doi: 10.14318/hau1.1.008
Palmeira, M. (2011). Prefacio. En: Leite Lopes, J. S. El vapor del diablo. El trabajo de los obreros del azúcar (pp. 57-62). Buenos Aires: Ed. Antropofagia.
Peirano, M. (1992). A favor da etnografía. Série Antropologia, PPAS-UNB, Brasilia. Recuperado de http://www.dan.unb.br/multisites/dan/media/docs/Serie130empdf
Pitt-Rivers, J. (1973): El análisis del contexto y el “locus” del modelo. En Tres ensayos de antropología estructural (pp. 13-48). Barcelona: Anagrama.
Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Restrepo, E. (2016). Etnografía: alcances, técnicas y éticas. Bogotá: Envión Editores.
Sahlins, M. (1988). Islas de historia. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Sahlins, M. (1981). Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities. Structure in the early history of the Sandwich Islands Kingdom. Ann Arbor: The University of Chicago Press.
Sanjek, R. (2002). Ethnography. En Barnard, A. y J. Spencer (Eds.): Encyclopaedia of Social-Cultural Anthropology (pp. 295-302). London and New York: Routledge.
Shah, A. (2017). Ethnography?: Participant observation, a potentially revolutionary praxis. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7(1): 45-59. doi: doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.008
Shryock, A. (3 de mayo de 2016). Ethnography: Provocation. [Correspondences, Cultural Anthropology website]. Recuperado de https://culanth.org/fieldsights/871-ethnography-provocation
Strathern, M. (2004). Partial connections: updated edition. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Visacovsky, S. (2017). Etnografía y antropología en Argentina: propuestas para la reconstrucción de un programa de investigación de lo universal. Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología, 27: 65-91. doi: 10.7440/antipoda27.2017.03
Wolf, E. (2001). On Fieldwork and Theory. En: Pathways of power. Building an anthropology of the modern world (pp. 49-62). Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: The University of California Press.
Yengoyan, A. (2006). Comparison and its discontents. En Yengoyan, A. (Ed.), Modes of comparison: theory and practice (pp. 137-158). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Fernando Alberto Balbi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this Journalaccept the following terms:
a. Authors will retain their copyrights and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and his first publication in this journal.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (eg, deposit it in an institutional electronic file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work on the Internet (eg in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access - El efecto del acceso abierto)
How to Cite
