Nitrogen nutrition and hybrid type and their influence on attributes that determine bioenergetic aptitude of sorghum

Article Sidebar

PDF (Spanish) HTML (Spanish)
Published: Dec 27, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31047/1668.298x.v35.n2.18744
Keywords:
Nitrogen fertilization, sweet sorghum, bioenergetic aptitude, lignocellulosic ethanol.

Main Article Content

Marcelo Gustavo Torrecillas
Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora
Luis Máximo Bertoia
Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora
Leandro Jorge Rey
Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora

Abstract

The use of renewable energy sources is growing worldwide and the search for alternative biomass for the production of fuel, such as ethanol, has intensified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different nitrogen (N) rates on use efficiency and several attributes of the sugar and lignocellulosic biomass of four morphotypes (Hyb) of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). During two growing seasons, fermentable sugar yield (FSY), theoretical ethanol yield from fermentable sugar (EYsug), cellulosic ethanol yield (EYcel), and the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) for dry matter yield (DMY) were evaluated. Significant year effects were observed for all measured traits. Nitrogen application strongly influenced all the traits measured, except soluble sugars (TSS). No significant N rate × morphotype interaction for any variable was noted. In both seasons sweet sorghum morphotypes were superior in FSY, due to higher values of soluble sugars (TSS). The 50 N rate presented the highest values in NUE. Although there were no significant differences between hybrids, the biomass yield of photosensitive types was decisive for ethanol yield prediction, both from sugars and cellulose.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nitrogen nutrition and hybrid type and their influence on attributes that determine bioenergetic aptitude of sorghum. (2018). AgriScientia, 35(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.31047/1668.298x.v35.n2.18744
Issue
Vol. 35 No. 2 (2018)
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Marcelo Gustavo Torrecillas, Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora

Cátedra de Manejo de Recursos forrajeros y Cerealicultura. Profesor Adjunto

How to Cite

Nitrogen nutrition and hybrid type and their influence on attributes that determine bioenergetic aptitude of sorghum. (2018). AgriScientia, 35(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.31047/1668.298x.v35.n2.18744
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Bennett, A.S. y Anex, R. P. (2008). Farm-gate production costs of sweet sorghum as a bioethanol feedstock. Trans. ASABE 51, 603-613.

Blumenthal, J. B., Rooney, W. L. y Wang D. (2007). Yield and ethanol production in sorghum genotypes.Agron Abstract [CD-ROM]. ASA, Madison, Wisconsin.

Boudet, A. M. (1998). A new view of lignification.Trends of Plant Science, 3, 67-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(97)01176-x.

Corn, R. J. (2009).Heterosis and composition of sweet sorghum.PhD. Diss. Soil and Crop Sciences.Texas A&M Univ., College Station. https://http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-12-7409/CORN-DISSERTATION.pdf.

Cotton, J., Burow, G., Acosta Martínez,V. y Moore-Kucera J. (2013). Biomass and cellulosic ethanol production of forage sorghum under limited water conditions. Bioenergy Research, 6, 711-718. doi: 10.1007/s12155-012-9285-0.

Dien, B. S., Jung, H. J. G., Vogel, K. P., Casler, M. D., Lamb, J. F. S., Iten, L., Mitchell, R. B. y Sarath, G. (2006). Chemical composition and response to dilute-acid pretreatment and enzimaticsaccharification of alfalfa, reed canarygrass, and switchgrass.Biomass&Bioenergy, 30,880-891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.02.004.

Di Rienzo, J.A.,Casanoves, F., Balzarini, M. G., González, L., Tablada,M. y Robledo, C.W.(2013). InfoStat versión 2013. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Argentina.

Erickson, J. E., Woodward, K. R. y Sollenberger, L. E. (2012). Optimizing sweet sorghum production for biofuel in the southeastern USA through nitrogen fertilization and top removal.Bioenergy Research, 5, 86-94. doi: 10.1007/s12155-011-9129-3.

Fageria, N. K. y Baligar, V.C. (2005). Enhancing nitrogen use efficiencyin crop plants.Advances in agronomy, 88, 97-185.

Grenell, J. L. (2014). Yield and carbon exchange of sorghum grown as advanced biofuel feedstock on abandoned agricultural land in southeastern Ohio. Thesis.Ohio Univ. Athens.

Han, K. J., Putnam, W. D., Alison, M. W., Harrell, D. L., Viator, H. P. y McCormick, M. E. (2012). Agronomic considerations for sweet sorghum biofuel production in the south-central USA.BioenergyResearch, 5, 748-758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9185-3.

Holou, R. A. Y. y Stevens, G. (2012). Juice, sugar and bagasse response of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.)Moench cv. M81E) to N fertilization and soil type.GCB Bioenergy, 4, 302-310. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01126.x.

Houx, J. H., Roberts, C. A. y Fritschi, F. B. (2013). Evaluation of sweet sorghum bagasse as an alternative livestock feed. Crop Science, 53, 1784-1790. doi:10.2135/cropsci2012.03.0190.

Hunter, E. L. y Anderson, I. C. (1997). Sweet sorghum.Horticulture Reviews, 21, 73-104.

Liska, A. J., Yang, H. S., Bremer, V. R., Klopfenstein, T. J., Walters, D. T., Erickson, G. E. y Cassman, K. G. (2009). Improvements in life cycle energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of corn-ethanol. Journalof IndustrialEcology, 13, 58-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00105.x

Maw, M. J. W., Houx III, J. H. y Fritschi, F. B. (2016). Sweet sorghum ethanol yield component response to nitrogen fertilization. Industrial Crops and Products, 84, 43-49. doi: 10.2134/agronj2016.01.0044.

Maw, M. J. W., Houx III, J. H. y Fritschi, F. B. (2017). Nitrogen use efficiency and yield response of high biomass sorghum in the lower Midwest. Agronomy Journal, 109, 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.01.038.

Monk, R. L. y Miller, F. R. (1984). Sorghum improvement for energy production.Biomass, 6, 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-4565(84)90017-9.

Monti, A. y Venturi, G. (2003). Comparison of the energy performance of fibre sorghum, sweet sorghum and wheat monocultures in northern Italy.European Journal of Agronomy, 19, 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00017-5.

Oliver, A. L., Pedersen, J. F., Grant, R. J. and Klopfenstein, T. J. (2005). Comparative effects of the sorghum bmr-6 and bmr-12 genes: I Forage sorghum yield and quality. Crop Science, 45, 2234-2239. doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.0644.

Olson, S. N., Ritter, K., Medley, J., Wilson, T., Rooney, W. L. y Mullet, J. E. (2013). Energy sorghum hybrids: Functional dynamics of high nitrogen use efficiency. Biomass & Bioenergy, 56, 307-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.04.028.

Pedersen, J. F., Vogel, K. P. y Funnell, D. L. (2005). Impact of Reduced Lignin on Plant Fitness.Crop Science, 45, 812–819. doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.0155.

Promkhambut, A., Polthanee, A., Akkasaeng, C. y Younger, A. (2011). Growth, yield and aerenchyma formation of sweet and multipurpose sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) as affected by flooding with different growth stages. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5, 954-965.

Propheter, J. L., Staggenborg, S. A., Wu, X. y Wang, D. (2010). Performance of annual and perennial biofuel crops: Yield during the first two years. Agronomy Journal, 102, 806-814. doi:10.2134/agronj2009.0301.

Ratnavathi, C. V., Suresh, K., Vijay Kumar, B. S., Pallavi, M., Komala, V. V. y Seetharama, N. (2010). Study on genotypic variation for ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice. Biomass & Bioenergy, 34, 947-952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.02.002.

Rocatelli, A. C., Raper, R. L., Balkcom, K. S., Arriaga, F. J. y Bransby, D. I. (2012). Biomass sorghum production and components under different irrigation/tillage systems for the southeastern US.Industrial Crops and Products, 36, 589-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.11.007.

Rooney, W. L., Blumenthal, J., Bean, B. y Mullet, J. E. (2007).Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock.Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining, 1, 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.15.

Sanderson, M. A., Jones, R. M., Ward, J. y Wolfe, R. (1992). Silage sorghum performance trial at Stephenville. Forage Research in Texas. Rep. PR-5018. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Stephenville.

Smith, G.A. yBuxton, D. R. (1993). Temperate zone sweet sorghum ethanol production potential.Bioresource Technology, 43, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(93)90086-Q.

Smith, L. L., Allen, D. J. y Barney, J. N. (2015). Yield potential and stand establishment for 20 candidate bioenergy feedstocks. Biomass&Bioenergy, 73, 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.12.015.

Tamang, P. L., Bronson, K. F., Malapati, A., Schwartz, R., Johnson, J. y Moore-Kucera, J. (2011). Nitrogen requirements for ethanol production from sweet and photoperiod sensitive sorghums in the southern high plains.Agronomy Journal, 103, 431-440. doi: 10.2134/agronj2010.0288.

Torrecillas, M. G., Cantamutto, M. A. y Bertoia, L. M. (2011). Head and stover contribution to digestible dry matter yield on grain and dual-purpose sorghum crop. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5, 116-122.

Vanderlip, R. L. (1993). How a sorghum plant develops. S3. Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University.

Vogel, K., Pedersen, J., Masterson, S. y Toy, J. (1999). Evaluation of a filter bag system for NDF, and IVDMD forage analysis. CropScience,39, 276-279.

Zhao, Y. L., Dolat, A., Steinberger, Y., Wang, X., Osman, A. y Xie, G. H. (2009). Biomass yield and changes in chemical composition of sweet sorghum cultivars grown for biofuel.Field Crops Research, 111, 55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2008.10.006.

Zhao, Y. L., Steinberger, Y., Shi, M., Han, L. P. y Xie, G. H. (2012).Changes in stem composition and harvested produce of sweet sorghum during the period from maturity to a sequence of delayed harvest dates.Biomass&Bioenergy, 39, 261-273.doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.020.