Mentors and proteges. The role of the trade unions in the career of the senatorial clerks
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Senate Chamber of the Argentinian Republic stands out for the interpersonal relationships based on patronage-bonding links between authorities, legislators, political parties or labor unions and clerks. Those bonds, in constant change, are sustained by kinship or affinity. Authorities and labor unions “arrange” the designations for the temporal and stable positions, in addition to promotions in the legislative ladder; authorities and senators unionize themselves, thus the labor unions become intrinsically influenced by politics, the Public Law 24600, the Statute and the idiosyncratic proceedings for the legislative personnel of the National Congress allow these irregular behaviors. In this context, a godfather is essential to ascend and secure the clerk’s career; being the person in charge of negotiating the employee’s “orders” with the authorities. The ethnographic tools (long-lasting fieldwork and interviews), the normative’s revision and the presidential decrees, allowed to reflect upon the rationality of the strategies deployed by the labor unions and the legislative clerks; it is expected to in this way make a contribution from an anthropological point of view to the knowledge of an uninvestigated facet of the legislative world, as are the personnel designations and the directions of their professional careers.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms of the copyright policy:
- Authors shall retain their copyright (including copyrights) and shall grant to the journal the right of first publication of their work, which shall simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License: No commercial use of the original work or any derivative works is permitted, distribution of which must be made under a license equal to that which governs the original work.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the publication process, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increased citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
References
ABÉLÈS, Marc (2001). Un ethnologue à l’Assemblée. Paris : Éditions Odile Jacob.
_______ (1992). La vie quotidienne au Parlement Européen. Paris : Hachette.
_______ (1995). “Pour une anthropologie des institutions”, L’Homme, tome 35, N° 135. Recuperado de http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/hom_0439- 4216_1995_num_35_135_369951
ABREU, Luiz Eduardo de Lacerda (1999). “Os laberintos do Minotauro. Política, troca e linguagem”. Teses de Doutorado no publicada. Programa de Pós-Graduação (Doutorado em Antropologia Social). UnB.
ÁLVAREZ, Chacho y MORALES SOLÁ, Joaquín (2002). Sin excusas. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana-La Nación.
BELLIER, Irène (2000). “A Europeanized elite? An Anthropology of European Commission Officials”. Yearbook of European Studies 14, 135-156. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233681261_A_Europeanized_Elite_An_Anthropology_of _European_Commission_Officials
BEZERRA, Marcos (1999). Em nome das « bases »: Política, favor e depêndencia pessoal. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará.
BOURDIEU, Pierre (1985). ¿Qué significa hablar? Madrid: Akal.
CALVO, Ernesto (2014), Legislator Success in Fragmented Congresses: Plurality Cartels, Minority Presidents, and Lawmaking, Nueva York, Cambridge University Press
CALVO, Ernesto, TOW, Andres (2009), “Cajoneando el debate: El papel de los presidentes de las comisiones en la productividad del Congreso argentino”, Desarrollo Económico 49(195):451-477.
COLABELLA, Laura (2012). Los negros del Congreso. Nombre, filiación y honor en el reclutamiento a la burocracia del Estado argentino. Buenos Aires: Editorial Antropofagia, Serie etnográfica.
COSTA, Maria Cecília Solheid da. (1980). “Os caminhos da Casa”. Rio de Janeiro. Tesis de Maestria no publicada. PPGAS/Museu Nacional/UFRJ (Dissertação de mestrado).
CREPPY, Ana María (2011). “Clima organizacional en el área administrativa del Senado de la Nación”. Tesis de Licenciatura no publicada. Escuela de Sociología, Universidad del Salvador, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales (inédita).
CREWE, Emma (2010), “An Anthropology of the House of Lords: Socialisation, Relationships and
Rituals”, The Journal of Legislative Studies 16(3):313-324, doi: 10.1080/13572334.2010.498100
_______ (2018), “Ethnographies of parliament: culture and uncertainty in shallow democracies”. Journal of Organization Ethnography 7(1):16-30, doi: 10.1108/JOE-11-2017-0057
DI PRÓSPERO, Norberto (2013). “Mi visión gremial en estos treinta años de democracia”. En Estaban NANNI (comp.). 30 años de democracia: la visión de los profesionales que se desempeñan en el Congreso de la Nación (pp. 3-43). Buenos Aires: Comisión de Profesionales / Asociación del Personal Legislativo. Recuperado de http://www.apldigital.org.ar/new/images/comisiones/profesionales/dossier/dossier_apl.pdf
EBENAU, Laura (2012). “Transacciones redistributivas y relaciones clientelares en la burocracia parlamentaria misionera”. Runa XXXIII, 1, 33-51.
FERREÑO, Laura (2011). “Yo soy de la casa”. Identidad, prácticas y discurso en una “casa política”. Curitiba: IX Reunião de Antropologia do Mercosul –RAM-.
_______ (2012). “Yo soy de la casa”. El H. Senado de la Nación: Prácticas y discursos en una “casa política”. Idéias - Revista do Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas – Unicamp, v. 3, n. 2, 189-222. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.20396/ideias.v3i2.8649354
GEDDES, Marc (2016), “Interpreting Parliamentary Scrutiny. An enquiry concerning everyday practices of parliamentary actors in select committees of the House of Commons”, Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Politics-Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Sheffield. Recuperado de https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d416/7bc428fc0b7c5761ca724a0ff07098a128ab.pdf?_ga=2.17871 3764.1014550271.1580410911-824519035.1579814280
JONES, Mark (2001), “Carreras políticas y disciplinas partidarias en la Cámara de Diputados argentina”, PostData, 7:189-230.
JONES, Mark, SAIEGH, Sebastián, SPILLER, Pablo, TOMMASI, Mariano (2002). “Amateur Legislators Professional Politicians: The Consequences of Party-Centered Electoral Rules in a Federal System”. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3):656-669, doi: 10.2307/3088406
KERTZER, David (1988). Ritual, Politics & Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.
HERZFELD, Michael (1993). The Social Production of Indifference. Exploring the Symbolic Roots of Western Bureaucracy. Chicago: The University Of Chicago.
KIKUCHI, Hirokazu, LODOLA, Germán (2014), “The Effects of Gubernatorial Influence and Political Careerism on Senatorial Voting Behavior: The Argentine Case”, Journal of Politics in Latin America 6(2):73–105, doi: 10.1177/1866802X1400600203
KUSCHNIR, Karina (2000). Eleições e representação no Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará, Coleção Antropologia da Política.
LEWELLEN, Ted (1994). Introducción a la Antropología política. Barcelona: Edicions Bellaterra.
LOMNITZ, Larissa (2001). “Redes informales de intercambio en sistemas formales: un modelo teórico”. Cap. IV. En: Redes sociales, cultura y poder. Ensayos de antropología latinoamericana (pp. 135-166). México: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Social –FLACSO- sede México, segunda reimpresión.
MARENCO DOS SANTOS, André. (1997), “Nas fronteiras do campo político. Raposas e outsiders no Congresso Nacional”, in Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 12(33):87-101. Recuperado de http://anpocs.com/images/stories/RBCS/33/rbcs33_06.pdf
MAUSS, Marcel (2009). Ensayo sobre el don. Razón y forma del cambio en las sociedades arcaicas. Buenos Aires: Katz Editores.
MUJICA, Jaris (2010). “Hacia una etnografía del Parlamento peruano”. Lima, Documento de Trabajo. Escuela de Gobierno y Políticas Públicas – PUCP. Doctorado en Ciencia Política y Gobierno. Recuperado de http://escuela.pucp.edu.pe/gobierno/images/documentos/investigaciones/jarismujica.pdf
MUSTAPIC, Ana, BONVECCHI, Alejandro, ZELAZNIK, Javier (comps.) (2012), Los legisladores en el Congreso argentino. Prácticas y estrategias, Buenos Aires, Instituto Torcuato Di Tella.
PONTAQUARTO, Mario (2005). El arrepentido. Cómo se hace política en Argentina. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.
ROGERS, Robert, WALTERS, Rodri (2015), How Parliament Works, Routledge (Seventh Edition), London.
SAETTONE, Federico (2015), “La elección del presidente y los vicepresidentes de la Cámara de Diputados en Argentina (1983-2014). Un estudio de caso”, Revista SAAP 9(2):343-374.
TEIXEIRA, Carla (1998), A honra da política, Relume Dumará, Rio de Janeiro.
POOLE, Deborah (2006). “Los usos de la costumbre. Hacia una antropología jurídica del Estado neoliberal”. Alteridades, vol. 16, núm. 31, 9-21. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=74703102
WOLF, Eric (1980). “Relaciones de parentesco, de amistad y patronazgo en las sociedades complejas”. En Michel Banton (comp.). Antropología social de las sociedades complejas. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.