Institucionalización y Profesionalización de la Historia de la Psicología como Especialidad en Estados Unidos: Influencias de la Historia, la Sociología y la Filosofía de la Ciencia

Barra lateral de artigos

PDF (Espanhol)
Publicado: Aug 20, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v8.n2.10060
Palavras-chave:
profesionalización de la historia de la psicología, historiografía de la psicología, historia social de la psicología, historia de la ciencia

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Catriel Fierro
Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Psicología

Resumo

Se analiza, desde un modelo histórico-sociológico, la consolidación y profesionalización de la Historia de la Psicología en el marco de la emergencia disciplinar de la Historia de las Ciencias del Comportamiento en Estados Unidos. Desde una perspectiva metodológica histórica, se describe primero el modelo historiográfico de Edwin Boring, enraizado en el experimentalismo. Se describen luego las recensiones del campo que, hacia 1960, realizaron Robert Watson y Robert Young. Se sintetizan los avances profesionales e institucionales más importantes del campo, enfatizando los Cursos de Verano de Historia de la Psicología. La ponderación de estos avances formativos revela su centralidad tanto para la profesionalización del campo como para la incorporación de influencias extra-disciplinarias, provenientes de la historiografía, la sociología y la filosofía de la ciencia, especialmente en la historia social o sociológica de la psicología. Se concluye que la profesionalización fue motorizada en gran medida por estas instancias y sus protagonistas.

Detalhes do artigo

Como Citar
Institucionalización y Profesionalización de la Historia de la Psicología como Especialidad en Estados Unidos: Influencias de la Historia, la Sociología y la Filosofía de la Ciencia. (2016). Revista Argentina De Ciencias Del Comportamiento, 8(2), 67-92. https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v8.n2.10060
Edição
v. 8 n. 2 (2016): Número Especial: "Historia de las Ciencias del Comportamiento"
Seção
Artículos Originales

Commons Attribution License, CCAL). Com esta licença, os autores conservam o direito de propriedade sobre artigos mas permitem que qualquer pessoa façam download e distribuam os artigos publicados na RACC sem necessidade da permissão do autor ou editor. Uma última condição é que sempre, e em todos os casos, o autor e a fonte original de publicação (p.e., RACC) sejam citados. Esta licença foi desenvolvido para facilitar o acesso aberto, gratuito e livre a trabalhos originais do arte e ciência.

Biografia do Autor

Catriel Fierro, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Psicología

Licenciado en Psicología (Graduado sobresaliente, UNMDP).

Becario Interno Doctoral CONICET.

Becario Estudiante Avanzado por la Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata en la Licenciatura en Psicología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (2014-2015).

Becario de Investigación por el Consejo Interuniversitario Nacional (2013-2014)

Docente alumno en cátedra "Historia social de la Psicologia" (2011-actualidad).

Adscripto a docencia en cátedras "Epistemología de la Psicología" (2013-actualidad)

Integrante del grupo de Investigación "Historia, Enseñanza y Profesionalización de la Psicología en los Países del Cono Sur de América", en proyecto "Formación de Psicólogos. Enseñanza de la historia de la psicología y estudio de áreas de vacancia”. 

Como Citar

Institucionalización y Profesionalización de la Historia de la Psicología como Especialidad en Estados Unidos: Influencias de la Historia, la Sociología y la Filosofía de la Ciencia. (2016). Revista Argentina De Ciencias Del Comportamiento, 8(2), 67-92. https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v8.n2.10060

Referências

Agassi, J. (1963/2008). Science and its history. A reassesment of the historiography of science. Nueva York: Springer.

Araujo, Saulo Freitas. (2016). Toward a philosophical history of psychology: An alternative path for the future. Theory & Psychology, 25(3), 1-21. doi: 10.1177/0959354316656062.

Ash, M. (Junio, 1980). Toward a social history of psychology: A long essay review. Trabajo presentado en el Annual Meeting de la Cheiron Society, Brunswick, Estados Unidos.

Ash, M. (1983). The self-presentation of a discipline: History of psychology in the United States between pedagogy and scholarship. En L. Graham, W. Lepenies, & P. Weingart (Eds.), Functions and uses of disciplinary histories (pp. 143-189). Dordretch: Springer.

Ash, M. (1987). Introduction. In M. Ash, & W. Woodward (Eds.), Psychology in twentieth-century thought and society (pp. 1-12). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

Ash, M., & Woodward, W. (Eds.). (1987). Psychology in twentieth-century thought and society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Baker, D., & Benjamin, L. (2000). The affirmation of the scientist-practitioner: A look back at Boulder. American Psychologist, 55(2), 241-247. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.241

Boring, E. (1950/1978). Historia de la psicología experimental. México D.F.: Trillas.

Brett, G. S. (1921/1963). Historia de la psicología. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Brock, A. (2014). Psychology in the modern sense. Theory & Psychology, 24(5), 717-722. doi: 10.1177/0959354314535513

Brozek, J. (1966). Breadth and depth in teaching history. American Psychologist, 21(11), 1075-1076. doi: 10.1037/h0021057

Brozek, J. (1969). History of Psychology: Diversity of approaches and uses. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 31(2), 115-127. doi: 10.1111/j.2164-0947.1969.tb02895.x

Brozek, J. (1982). Contributions of Robert I. Watson (1909-1980) to the literature on the History of Psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 18(4), 326-331. doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(198210)18:4<326::AID-JHBS2300180408>3.0.CO;2-N

Brozek, J. (1990). Historiography of Psychology: A brief look into the past. Psychologie und Geschichte, 2(2), 96-101.

Brozek, J. (1999). History of a historian of psychology in the United States. History of Psychology, 2(2), 83-101. doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.2.2.83

Brozek, J., & Pongratz, L. (Eds). (1980). Historiography of modern psychology. Toronto: Hogrefe.

Brozek, J., & Schneider, L. (1973). Second summer institute on the History of Psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 9(2), 91-101.

Brozek, J., Watson, R., & Ross, B. (1969). A summer institute on the History of Psychology: Part I. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 5(4), 307-319. doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(196910)5:4<307::AID-JHBS2300050402>3.0.CO;2-R

Brozek, J., Watson, R., & Ross, B. (1970). A summer institute on the History of Psychology: Part II. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 6(1), 25-35. doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(197001)6:1<25::AID-JHBS2300060104>3.0.CO;2-U

Buchdahl, G. (1965). A revolution in historiography of science. History of Science, 4, 55-69. doi: 10.1177/007327536500400103

Buss, A. (1976). Galton and the birth of differential psychology and eugenics: social, political, and economic forces. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 12(1), 47-58.

Buss, A. (Ed.). (1979a). Psychology in social context. Nueva York: Irvington.

Buss, A. (1979b). The emerging field of the sociology of psychological knowledge. En A. Buss (Ed.), Psychology in social context (pp.1-24). Nueva York: Irvington.

Camfield, T. (1973). The professionalization of american psychology, 1870-1917. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 9(1), 66-75.

Campbell, D. (1979/1988). A tribal model of the social system vehicle carrying scientific knowledge. En D. Campbell (Ed.), Methodology and Epistemology for Social Sciences: Selected Papers (pp. 489-503). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Capshew, J. (2014). History of Psychology since 1945. A north american review. En R. Backhouse, & P. Fontaine (Eds). A Historiography of the Modern Social Sciences. 144-182. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

Coleman, S. R., & Salamon, R. (1988). Kuhn's structure of scientific revolutions in the psychological journal literature, 1969-1983: A descriptive Study. The Journal of Mind and Behaviour, 9(4), 415-446.

Cravens, H. (1990). Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences by Barbara Ross: History of the human sciences by Arthur Still; Irving Velody. Isis, 81(2), 306-308.

Dale, N. (1962). Current practices in teaching history of psychology. American Psychologist, 17(5), 250-252. doi: 10.1037/h0049006

Danziger, K. (1979). The social origins of modern psychology. En A. Buss (Ed.), Psychology in social context (pp. 27-45). Nueva York: Irvington.

Danziger, K. (1984). Towards a conceptual framework for a critical history of psychology. Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 5(1), 99-107.

Danziger, K. (1990). The social context of research practice and the History of Psychology. In W. Baker, R. Van Hezewijk, M. E. Hyland, & S. Terwee (Eds.), Recent Trends in Theoretical Psychology (pp. 297-303). Nueva York: Springer-Verlag.

Evans, R. (1982). Robert I. Watson and the History of Psychology program at the University of New Hampshire. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 18(3), 320-321.

Friedman, R. (1967). Edwin G. Boring's “mature” view of the science of science in relation to a deterministic personal and intellectual motif. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 3(1), 17-26.

Furumoto, L. (1989). The new history of psychology. En I. Cohen (Ed.), The G. Stanley Hall Lecture Series (Vol. 9) (pp. 5-34). Washington, D.C: APA.

Gallegos, M. (2014a). Thomas Kuhn y su vinculación con la psicología: Un homenaje de despedida. Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 35(2), 65-92.

Gallegos, M. (2014b). La génesis de la profesión psicológica. Eureka, 11(1), 134-148.

Goodman, E. (1982). Robert I. Watson and the Cheiron Society. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 18(3), 322-325.

Gruba-McCallister, F. (1978). Efficient causality in Boring's work and thought: A case of one-sided determinism. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), 207-212.

Harris, B. (1979). Whatever happened to little Albert? American Psychologist, 34(2), 151-160. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.2.151

Harris, B. (1980). Ceremonial vs. critical history of psychology. American Psychologist, 35(2), 218-219. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.218

Heidbreder, E. (1933/1960). Psicologías del Siglo XX. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Helson, H. (1972). What can we learn from the the history of psychology? Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 8(2), 115-119.

Henle, M. (1976). Why study the history of psychology? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 270, 14-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb34212.x

Henle, M., Jaynes, J., & Sullivan, J. (Eds.). (1973). Historical Conceptions of Psychology. Nueva York: Springer.

Hilgard, E. (1982). Robert I. Watson and the founding of Division 26 of the American Psychological Association. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 18(3), 308-311.

Hilgard, E., Leary, D., & McGuire, G. (1991). The History of Psychology: A survey and critical assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 79-107. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.000455

Jarausch, K. (1985). The crisis of german professions, 1918-1933. Journal of Contemporary History, 20(3), 379-398. doi: 10.1177/002200948502000302

Jaynes, J. (1969). Edwin Garrigues Boring: 1886–1968. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 5(2), 99-112. doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(196904)5:2<99::AID-JHBS2300050202>3.0.CO;2-8

Jaynes, J. (1973). The study of the history of psychology. In M. Henle, J. Jaynes, & J. Sullivan (Eds.), Historical conceptions of Psychology (pp. ix-xii). Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Springer.

Kelly, B. (1981). Inventing psychology's past: E. G. Boring's historiography in relation to the psychology of his time. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 2(3), 229-241.

Klappenbach, H. (2000). Historia de la historiografía de la psicología. En J. C. Ríos, R. Ruiz, J. C. Stagnaro, & P. Weissman (Eds.), Psiquiatría, Psicología y Psicoanálisis: Historia y Memoria (pp. 238-268). Buenos Aires: Polemos.

Klappenbach, H. (2006). Construcción de tradiciones historiográficas en psicología y psicoanálisis. Psicologia em Estudo, 11, 3-17.

Klappenbach, H. (2014). Acerca de la metodología de investigación en la historia de la Psicología. Psykhe, 23, 1-12.

Krantz, D. (1969). The Baldwin-Titchener controversy. In D. Krantz (Ed.), Schools of Psychology (pp. 1-19). Nueva York: Appleton Century Croft.

Krantz, D. (1971). The separate worlds of operant and non-pperant Psychology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 61-70. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-61

Kuhn, T. (1962/1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Kuklick, H. (1980). Boundary maintenance in american sociology: Limitations to academic "professionalization". Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16(3), 201-219. doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(198007)16:3<201::AID-JHBS2300160302>3.0.CO;2-3

Kuklick, H. (1983). Toward a social history of social thought - An essay review. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 19(3), 234-239. doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(198307)19:33.0.CO;2-1

Lafuente, E. (2011). De anomalía biográfica a modelo historiográfico: la Historia de la Psicología Experimental de E. G. Boring, una cuestión disputada. Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 32(1), 55-72.

Leichtman, M. (1979). Gestalt psychology and the revolt against positivism. En A. Buss (Ed.), Psychology in Social Context (pp. 47-75). Nueva York: Irvington.

Lindenfeld, D. (1983). Review of psychology in twentieth-century thought and society. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 19(3), 280-283.

Louw, J. (2004). In search of method. En A. C. Brock, J. Louw, & W. Van Hoorn (Eds.), Rediscovering the history of psychology: Essays inspired by the work of Kurt Danziger (pp. 33-52). Nueva York: Springer.

Lovett, B. (2006). The new history of Psychology: A review and critique. History of Psychology, 9(1), 17-37. doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.9.1.17

Madden, E. (1965). E. G. Boring's philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science, 32(2), 194-201. doi: 10.2307/186415

Morawski, J. (1992). There is more to our history of giving. The place of introductory textbooks in American Psychology. American Psychologist, 47(2), 161-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.2.161

Murphy, G. (1929/1964). Introducción Histórica a la Psicología Moderna. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

O'Donnell, J. (1979). The crisis of experimentalism in the 1920s: E. G. Boring and his uses of history. American Psychologist, 34(4), 289-295. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.4.289

Polanyi, M. (1957). Scientific outlook: Its sickness and cure. Science, 125(3246), 480-484. doi: 10.1126/science.125.3246.480

Polanyi, M. (1958/1962). Personal knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy. Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Polanyi, M. (1958/1966). El estudio del hombre. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Rancurello, A. (1968). A study of Franz Brentano. Nueva York: Academic Press.

Riedel, R. (1974). The current status of the history and systems of psychology courses in american colleges and universities. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 10(4), 410-412.

Ringer, F. (1990). The decline of the german mandarins: The german academic community, 1890-1933. Hanover, New Hampshire: Wesleyan University Press.

Ross, B. (1982). Robert I. Watson and the founding of the Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 18(3), 312-316. doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(198210)18:4<312::AID-JHBS2300180404>3.0.CO;2-B

Ross, D. (1967). On the origins of Psychology. American Sociological Review, 32(3), 466-469. doi: 10.2307/233709

Ross, D. (1969). The "Zeitgeist" and american Psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 5(3), 256-262. doi: 10.1002/1520-6696

Ross, D. (1979/1993). The development of the social sciences. In J. Farr, & R. Siedelman (Eds.), Discipline and History: Political Science in the United States (pp. 81-104). Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.

Sáiz, M., & Sáiz, D. (2001). Cuarenta años después del trabajo de Robert I. Watson. ¿Es ahora la historia de la psicología un área olvidada? Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 22(3-4), 517-524.

Samelson, F. (1974). History, origin myth and ideology: Comte's discovery of social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 4(2), 217-232. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1974.tb00338.x

Samelson, F. (1979). Putting Psychology on the map: Ideology and intelligence testing. In A. Buss (Ed.), Psychology in social context (pp. 103-168). Nueva York: Irvington.

Samelson, F. (1980a). E.G. Boring and his history of experimental psychology. American Psychologist, 35(5), 467-470. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.35.5.467.b

Samelson, F. (1980b). J. B. Watson's little Albert, Cyril Burt's twins, and the need for a critical science. American Psychologist, 35(7), 619-625. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.35.7.619

Scarborough, E. (2004). Cheiron's origins: Personal recollections and a photograph. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 40(2), 207-211. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.20018

Smith, R. (1984). The problematic science: psychology in nineteenth-century thought. Medical History, 28(2), 222-223. doi: 10.1017/S0025727300035869

Sokal, M. (1978). History of the social and behavioral sciences at Edinburgh: Notes on the Fifteenth International Congress of the History of Science, 10-19 August 1977. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 14(4), 387-390.

Sokal, M. (1983). Recent reference books in the history of science: An essay review. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 19(3), 245-249.

Sokal, M. (1984a). James McKeen Cattell and american psychology in the 1920s. En J. Brozek (Ed.), Explorations in the history of psychology in the United States (pp. 273-323). Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.

Sokal, M. (1984b). History of Psychology and History of Science: Reflections on two subdisciplines, their relationship and their convergence. Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 5(1-2), 337-347.

Sokal, M. (1992). Origins and early years of the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist 47(2), 111-122. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.47.2.111

Sokal, M. (1998). On history of psychology's lauch. History of Psychology, 1(1), 3-7.

Sokal, M. (2006). The origins of the new psychology in the United States. Physis, 43, 273-300.

Stam, H. (2004). Reconstructing the subject. Kurt Danziger and the revisionist project in historiographies of psychology. En A. Brock, J. Louw, & W. van Hoorn, (Ed.) Rediscovering the History of Psychology: Essays inspired by the work of Kurt Danziger (pp. 19-32).

Nueva York: Springer.

Tortosa, F., Mayor, L., & Carpintero, H. (1990). La historiografía de la psicología: Orientaciones y problemas. En F. Tortosa, L. Mayor, & H. Carpintero (Eds.), La Psicología Contemporánea desde la Historiografía (pp. 25-48). Barcelona: PPU.

Tur, A. M., Samper, P., Mestre, M. V., & Pérez Delgado, E. (1997). Jalones históricos de la implantación y consolidación de la disciplina 'Historia de la Psicología' en USA. Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 18(3/4), 525-537.

Vaughn-Blount, K., Rutherford, A., Baker, D., & Johnson, D. (2009). History's mysteries demystified: Becoming a psychologist-historian. American Journal of Psychology, 122(1), 117-129.

Watson, R. (1960). The history of psychology: A neglected area. American Psychologist, 15(4), 251-255. doi: 10.1037/h0044284

Watson, R. (1963). The great psychologists: from Aristotle to Freud. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

Watson, R. (1966). The role and use of history in the psychology curriculum. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 2(1), 64-69.

Watson, R. (1967). A note on the history of psychology as a specialization. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 3(2), 192-193. doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(196704)3:2<192::AID-JHBS2300030207>3.0.CO;2-6

Watson, R. (1968). Recent developments in the historiography of american psychology. Isis, 59(2), 199-205. doi: 10.1086/350367

Watson, R. (1975). The history of psychology as a speciality: A personal view of its first 15 years. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 11(1), 5-14.

Watson, R. (1978). The history of psychology and the behavioral sciences. A bibliographic guide. Nueva York: Springer.

Watson, R. (1979). The history of psychology conceived as social psychology of the past. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 103-114.

Watson, R. (1980). Socio-psychological approach: The study of personality. En J. Brozek, & L. Pongratz (Eds.), Historiography of modern psychology. 315-324. Toronto: Hogrefe.

Watson, R., & Carlson, E. (1965). The birth of a journal. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 3-4.

Wertheimer, M. (1984). History of psychology: What's new about what's old? En A. Rogers, & J. Scheirer (Eds.), The G. Stanley Hall lecture series, Vol. 4. 159-188. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Wettersten, J. (1975). The historiography of scientific psychology: A critical study. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 11(2), 157-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/15206696(197504)11:2<157::AID-JHBS2300110207>3.0.CO;2-5

Weyant, R. (1968). Some reflections on the NSF summer institute in the history of psychology. The canadian psychologist, 9(4), 505-510. doi: 10.1037/h0082678

Woodward, W. (1980). Toward a critical historiography of psychology. En J. Brozek, & L. Pongratz (Eds.), Historiography of modern psychology. 29-70. Toronto: Hogrefe.

Woodward, W. (1982). A commentary on the symposium: The use of history in the social sciences curriculum. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 18(3), 286-289.

Woodward, W. (1987). Professionalization, rationality and political linkages in twentieth-century psychology. In M. Ash, & W.

Woodward (Eds.), Psychology in twentieth-century thought and society (pp. 295-309). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

Woodward, W., & Ash, M. (Eds.). (1982). The problematic science: Psychology in nineteenth-century thought. Nueva York: Praeger.

Woodworth, R. (1938/1961). Contemporary schools of psychology. Calcuta: Asia Pub. House.

Young, R. (1966). Scholarship and the history of the behavioural sciences. History of Science, 5, 1-51. doi: 10.1177/007327536600500101