Blocking and stimulus modality in CEE: difficulties in teaching with pictograms

Article Sidebar

PDF (Spanish)
Published: Aug 26, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v11.n2.22662
Keywords:
blocking, category learning, stimuli equivalence classes, SEC, verbal behavior

Main Article Content

Joaquin Menendez
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Manuel Correa Freisztav
Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Delfina Valentini
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Federico Sanchez
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Iair Embon
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Nicolas Rodriguez Arriagada
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Alberto Iorio
Universidad de Buenos Aires ; Laboratorio de Biología del Comportamiento, IByME CONICET

Abstract

It has been observed that the use of pictures interferes when teaching novel words. We sought to extend these results to Stimulus Equivalence Classes (SEC), investigating whether the blocking effect occurs differentially according to the modality of the blocked stimulus (i.e. pictorial or pseudo-lexical). Ten university students were trained, by matching to sample, in four SEC (two of pseudo-lexical modality and two of pictorial modality). A blocking procedure was applied during the same training. Emergence of derived relationships for each element of the compound stimuli was separately evaluated. A greater blocking effect was observed whenever the blocking stimulus X was of pseudo-lexical modality. Results are discussed regarding associative theories, as well as its implications in the development of pedagogical practices. The results observed discourage the use of images in compound stimuli for the teaching of novel words

Article Details

How to Cite
Blocking and stimulus modality in CEE: difficulties in teaching with pictograms. (2019). Argentinean Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 11(2), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v11.n2.22662
Issue
Vol. 11 No. 2 (2019): REVISTA ARGENTINA DE CIENCIAS DEL COMPORTAMIENTO
Section
Original Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

La RACC aplicará la licencia internacional de atribuciones comunes creativas (Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Bajo esta licencia, se permite cualquier explotación de la obra, incluyendo la explotación con fines comerciales y la creación de obras derivadas, la distribución de las cuales también está permitida sin ninguna restricción. Esta licencia es una licencia libre según la Freedom Defined. La única condición es que siempre y en todos los casos se cite a los autores y a la fuente original de publicación (i.e., RACC). Esta licencia fue desarrollada para facilitar el acceso abierto, gratuito y libre a trabajos originales científicos y artísticos.

Author Biographies

Joaquin Menendez, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Licenciado en psicología, UBA. Docente de métodos psicofisiologicos, facultad de psicología, UBA. Becario Fulbright Becar.


Manuel Correa Freisztav, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Estudiante de psicologia, UBA. Ayudante alumno en Neurofisiología Cátedra II. Becario estímulo UBACyT. Pasante en Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IByME)

Delfina Valentini, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Estudiante de psicologia, UBA. Colaborador alumno en Neurofisiología Cátedra II.


Federico Sanchez, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Licenciado en Psicología, UBA. Doctorando en Psicología, UBA. Docente de Neurofisiología cátedra II.

Iair Embon, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Estudiante de psicologia, UBA. Ayudante de segunda en Neurofisiología Cátedra II. Becario estímulo CIN.


Nicolas Rodriguez Arriagada, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Estudiante de Psicologia, UBA. Ayudante de segunda en Métodos Psicofisiologicos, UBA. Pasante en análisis de datos – LPEN, INECO-INCYT (2017 – presente).


Alberto Iorio, Universidad de Buenos Aires ; Laboratorio de Biología del Comportamiento, IByME CONICET

Doctor en Medicina, UBA. Profesor Titular de Neurofisiología cátedra II, UBA. Profesor Titular de Métodos Psicofisiologicos, UBA. Jefe de Servicio Neurofisiología Clínica. Hospital J.A.Fernández GCABA. Grupo de Neurociencias en Humanos - Laboratorio de Biología del Comportamiento, IByME CONICET.


How to Cite

Blocking and stimulus modality in CEE: difficulties in teaching with pictograms. (2019). Argentinean Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 11(2), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v11.n2.22662

References

Albright, L., Reeve, K. F., Reeve, S. A., & Kisamore, A. N. (2015). Teaching statistical variability with equivalence-based instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48(4), 883-894. doi: 10.1002/jaba.249

American Psychological Association (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060-1073. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.12.1060

Arntzen, E., Grondahl, T., & Eilifsen, C. (2010). The effects of different training structures in the establishment of conditional discriminations and subsequent performance on tests for stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 60(3), 437-461. doi: 10.1007/BF03395720

Arntzen, E., & Lunde Nikolaisen, S. (2011). Establishing equivalence classes in children using familiar and abstract stimuli and many-to-one and one-to-many training structures. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 12(1), 105-120. doi: 10.1080/15021149.2011.11434358

Avellaneda, M., Menéndez, J., Santillán, M., Sánchez, F., Idesis, S., Papagna, V., & Iorio, A. (2016). Equivalence class formation is influenced by stimulus contingency. The Psychological Record, 66(3), 477-487. doi: 10.1007/s40732-016-0187.

Barnes-Holmes, S. C. H. D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

Connell, J. E., & Witt, J. C. (2004). Applications of computer-based instruction: Using specialized software to aid letter name and letter-sound recognition. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37(1), 67-71. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2004.37-67

Correa Freisztav, M., Embon, I., Menendez, J., Bruno, N. M., Iorio, A., & Sanchez, F. J. (en prensa). Bloqueando la formación de clases de equivalencia. Efecto de las restricciones temporales. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta.

Delgado, D. (2016). Blocking in humans: logical reasoning versus contingency learning. The Psychological Record, 66(1), 31-41. doi: 10.1007/s40732-015-0148-x

Delgado, D. M. D., & Medina Arboleda, I. F. (2013). Cuando la contigüidad no es suficiente: Bloqueo en relaciones de equivalencia. Universitas Psychologica, 12(2), 613-626. doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.upsy12-2.ccsb

Delgado, D., Medina, I. F., & Soto, J. S. (2011). El lenguaje como mediador de la transferencia de funciones: ¿es necesario nominar para relacionar? Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 37(2), 31-52. doi: 10.5514/rmac.v37.i2.26138

Devany, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46(3), 243–257. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-243.

Didden, R., Prinsen, H., & Sigafoos, J. (2000). The blocking effect of pictorial prompts on sight?word reading. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33(3), 317-320. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-317

Ferro García, R., Valero Aguayo, L., & Vives Montero, M. D. C. (2006). Formación de categorías pictóricas a través de relaciones de equivalencia en un sujeto con Síndrome de Down. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 23(2), 277-285.

Fiorentini, L., Arismendi, M., & Yorio, A. A. (2012). Una revisión de las aplicaciones del paradigma de equivalencia de estímulos. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 12(2), 261-275.

Fiorentini, L., Vernis, S., Arismendi, M., Primero, G., Argibay, J. C., Sánchez, F. J., & Iorio, A. A. (2013). Relaciones de equivalencia de estímulos y relaciones de equivalencia-equivalencia: efectos de la estructura de entrenamiento. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 13(2), 233-242.

Fossett, B., & Mirenda, P. (2006). Sight word reading in children with developmental disabilities: A comparison of paired associate and picture-to-text matching instruction. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27(4), 411-429. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2005.05.006

Griffith, K. R., Ramos, A. L., Hill, K. E., & Miguel, C. F. (2018). Using equivalence?based instruction to teach piano skills to college students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51(2), 207-219. doi: 10.1002/jaba.438

Hall, G. A., & Chase, P. N. (1991). The relationship between stimulus equivalence and verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 9(1), 107–119. doi: 10.1007/BF03392865

Hayes, S. C., Gifford, E. V., Townsend, R. C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2002). Thinking, problem-solving, and pragmatic verbal analysis. En D. Barnes-Holmes & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational Frame Theory, (pp. 87-101). doi: 10.1007/0-306-47638-X_5

Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2009). Acceptance and commitment therapy. Washington: American Psychological Association.

Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 185-241. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185

Kamin, L. J. (1968). “Attention-like” processes in classical

conditioning. En M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior: Aversive stimulation (pp. 9–31). Miami: University of Miami Press.

Karazinov, D. M., & Boakes, R. A. (2007). Second-order conditioning in human predictive judgements when there is little time to think. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(3), 448-460. doi: 10.1080/17470210601002488

Kinloch, J. M., McEwan, J. S. A., & Foster, T. M. (2013). Matching-to-sample and stimulus-pairing-observation procedures in stimulus equivalence: The effects of number of trials and stimulus arrangement. The Psychological Record, 63(1), 157-174. doi: 10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.1.012

LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293-323. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2

Lang, R. J., & Solman, R. T. (1979). Effect of pictures on learning to read common nouns. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 49(2), 138-149. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1979.tb02408.x

McIlvane, W. J., & Dube, W. V. (1996). Naming as a facilitator of discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 267-272. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-267

Menéndez, J., Avellaneda, M., & Iorio, A. (2018). Ensombreciendo el surgimiento de clases de equivalencia. Anuario de Investigaciones, 24, 291-299.

Menéndez, J., Sánchez, F. J., Avellaneda, M. A., Idesis, S. A., & Iorio, A. A. (2017). Effects of Mixed Training Structures on Equivalence Class Formation. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 17(3), 291-303.

Menéndez, J., Sánchez, F., Polti, I., Idesis, S., Avellaneda, M., Tabullo, Á., & Iorio, A. (2018). Event-related potential correlates of stimulus equivalence classes: A study of task order of the equivalence based priming probes with respect to the stimulus equivalence tests, and among the distinct trial types with each other. Behavioural Brain Research, 347, 242-254. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.03.017

Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., & McEvoy, C. L. (1977). Learning to order pictures and words: A model of sensory and semantic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3(5), 485-497. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.3.5.485

Newton, D. P. (1995). The role of pictures in learning to read. Educational Studies, 21(1), 119-130. doi: 10.1080/0305569950210109

O'Donnell, J., & Saunders, K. J. (2003). Equivalence relations in individuals with language limitations and mental retardation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 80(1), 131-157. doi: 0.1901/jeab.2003.80-131

Peirce, J. W. (2008). Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2, 1-8. doi: 10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008

Polti, I. (2014). Correlatos neurobiológicos de la formación de los conceptos en humanos. En L. Fiorentini & A. Yorio (Eds.), Formación de conceptos: aspectos teóricos y aplicados (pp. 24-46). Recuperado de: https://www.academia.edu/24596761/FORMACIÓN_DE_CONCEPTOS._Aspectos_Teoricos_y_Aplicados

Pytte, C. L., & Fienup, D. M. (2012). Using equivalence-based instruction to increase efficiency in teaching neuroanatomy. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 10(2), A125-A131.

Rehfeldt, R. A., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (Eds.). (2009). Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities: A progressive guide to change. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications.

Rehfeldt, R. A., Clayton, M., & Hayes, L. J. (1998). Blocking the formation of 5-member equivalence classes using complex samples. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 24(3), 279-292.

Rehfeldt, R. A., Dixon, M. R., Hayes, L. J., & Steele, A. (1998). Stimulus equivalence and the blocking effect. The Psychological Record, 48(4), 647-664. doi: 10.1007/BF03395295

Samuels, S. J., Spiroff, J., & Singer, H. (1974). Effect of pictures and contextual conditions on learning to read. Occasional Paper, 25, 1-19.

Sánchez, F. J., Menéndez, J., Avellaneda, M. A., Idesis, S. A., & Iorio, A. A. (2016). Training structures of equivalence classes and their influence on the priming effect. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 8(3), 8-19.

Saunders, R. J., & Solman, R. T. (1984). The effect of pictures on the acquisition of a small vocabulary of similar sight?words. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(3), 265-275. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1984.tb02590.x

Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14(1), 5-13. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1401.05

Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.

Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74(1), 127-146. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127

Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37(1), 5-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5

Singh, N. N., & Solman, R. T. (1990). A stimulus control analysis of the picture?word problem in children who are mentally retarded: the blocking effect. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23(4), 525-532. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-525

Solman, R. T., Singh, N. N., & Kehoe, E. J. (1992). Pictures block the learning of sightwords. Educational Psychology, 12(2), 143-153. doi: 10.1080/0144341920120205

Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayes, S. C., & Lipkens, R. (2002). Relations among relations: Analogies, metaphors, and stories. En S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes & B. Roche (Eds.) Relational frame theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition (pp. 73-86). Boston: Springer. doi: 10.1007/0-306-47638-X_4

Tonneau, F. (2001). Equivalence relations: A critical analysis. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 2(1), 1-33. doi: 10.1080/15021149.2001.11434165

Wu, H. M., & Solman, R. T. (1993). Effective use of pictures as extra stimulus prompts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 144-160. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01047.x