Resource Sustainability Through the Institutions of the Commons. The case of Chile's Semi-arid Norte Chico

Authors

  • Gloria Gallardo Fernández Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52885/2683-9164.v.n2-3.23293

Abstract

Although marginal, natural resources managed under the commons exist everywhere, as a land management solution, the discussion about the commons has even significance for resources whose ecological balance concern all of us. Does communal land management constitute a more problematic solution for the environment and social reproduction than private ownership? The empirical evidence suggets a negative answer. This paper presents and discuss a variation of the commons ce the communal land ownership of the 200 agricultural communities of Chile's semi-arid Norte Chico ceboth in relation to other examples of commons and to private property. Situated between the Atacama desert and the Central Valley, the Norte Chico constitutes a fragile ecological area, presenting a dilemma as poverty threatens these common managed communities. In the Latin-American discussion, it is usually argued that communal land arises in marginal and mountainous ecological zones, and therefore in lands that are not in the landowners' interest. Although the majority of the communities managed under the commons are situated in a semi-mountainous environment, they are also found in fertile land areas, contradicting this way the former view. The commons are furthermore often reduced to the small peasantry. Differentiating the commons from private property, the study suggests that the commons are an institution of its own, which in Chile shares the same historical origin in colonial land grants as private property. Since the agricultural communities have kept their territorial integrity permanently undivided, the study suggests that they have developed as a permanent land management solution to avoid land fragmentation.

Downloads

Author Biography

  • Gloria Gallardo Fernández, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala

References

ARANDA Ximena, Un Tipo de Ganadería Tradicional en el Norte Chico, la Transhumancia, Santiago, Departamento de Geografía, Universidad de Chile, 1971.

ASTORGA Enrique, “Más campesinos, más proletarios: Elementos para reinterpretar la acción institucional en el campo”, en Revista Mexicana de Sociología, n°3, México, 1985.

BENGOA José, Historia Social de la Agricultura Chilena, Santiago, vol. 1, Ediciones Sur, 1988.

BRAUDEL Fernand, El Mediterráneo y el Mundo Mediterráneo en la Época de Felipe II, Vol. I, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1981.

GÓMEZ Sergio, “Políticas estatales y campesinado en Chile (1960-1989), Santiago de Chile, Documento de Trabajo, Programa FLACSO-CHILE, núm 409, 1989.

HAVNEVIK Kjell, “The land question in Sub-Sahara Africa”, Uppsala, IRD-Currents, Departament of Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 1997.

HENDRICKS Fred T., The Pillars of Apartheid. Land Tenure, Rural Planning and the Chieftancy, Uppsala, Acta Universitis Upsaliensis, Studia Sociologica Upsaliensia, 32, 1990.

HENDRICKS Fred, The Pillars of Apartheid Land Tenure, Rural Planning and The Chieftancy, Uppsala, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Sociologica Upsaliensia, 32, 1990.

JOHN Bruce W., “Revieuw of tenure Terminology”, Tenure Brief, núm 1, Madison, 1998.

LEWIS Oscar, Tepozlán: Village in Mexico, USA, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc, 1960.

MANN Susan, Agrarian Capitalism in Theory and Practice, The University of North Carolina Press, 1990.

MCCAY J.B and ACHESON J.M, The Question of the Commons. The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources, Tucson, The University of Arizona Press, 1996.

OSTROM Elinor, Governing the Commons. The evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, USA, Cambrigde University Press, 1999.

PUCCIARELLI Alfredo, “El dominio estatal de la agricultura campesina. Estudio sobre ejidatarios minifundistas de la comarca lagunera”, en Revista Mexicana de Sociología, núm 3, México, 1985.

RIVERA Rigoberta, Los Campesinos Chilenos, Serie GIA/3, Santiago de Chile, Grupo de Investigaciones Agrarias (GIAS), 1988.

STEVENSON Glenn G., Common Property Economics: A General Theory and Land Applications, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.

WARMAN Arturo, “Notas para una redefinición de la comunidad agraria”, en Revista Mexicana de Sociología n° 3, México, 1985.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Dossier

How to Cite

Resource Sustainability Through the Institutions of the Commons. The case of Chile’s Semi-arid Norte Chico. (2003). Anuario Del Centro De Estudios Históricos Profesor Carlos S. A. Segreti, 2-3, 41-62. https://doi.org/10.52885/2683-9164.v.n2-3.23293