The specificity of social research methodology when working with people on “probation.”The case of women “in transition”

Authors

  • Beatriz Kalinsky Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v3.n1.5452

Keywords:

women, probation, methodology, relationships, heuristic source

Abstract

This paper attempts to account the drastic change in the relationships with that happens between de anthropologist and the interlocutors in the case of women who go from being deprived of their liberty on their return to free society (“probation”). Methodological conditions that had been established during the progress of their sentence in jail can not be sustained anymore from a methodological point of view and practical and ethical issues so we must need to think what to do with the fissures that are created and likewise the mutual responsibilities appearing that radically change the scenario of an anthropological research on this subject. This paper also emphasizes the lack of references and the lack of practical investigations. We believe that this article may help to broaden the view in such situations and act as a heuristic source for similar situations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Beatriz Kalinsky, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas.

Antropóloga. Doctora por la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Docente del departamento de Ciencias Antropológicas de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. UBA. Investigadora independiente del CONICET con sede de trabajo en el Instituto de Ciencias Antropológicas de las antedichas facultad y universidad.

References

Briceño-León, R (comp.) 2002 Violencia, Sociedad y Justicia en América Latina. Buenos Aires, Clacso Carlen, P Y J Tombs, 2006 Reconfigurations of penalty. The ongoing case of the women’s imprisonment and reintegration industries. Theoretical Criminology. Vol. 10 (3): 337-360

Cesano, J, 2009 Notas para la compresión de una hipótesis interpretativa sobre la libertad condicional (… Cuando desde la historia de las ideas se analiza el discurso jurídico). Horizontes y Convergencias. Lecturas históricas y antropológicas sobre el Derecho. http://horizontesyc.com.ar/ Última consulta: 02/06/2010

Da Cunha, M. 2004 El tiempo que no cesa. La erosión de la frontera carcelaria. Renglones. Números 58-59: 32- 40

Hastrup, K 2004 “Getting it Right. Knowledge and evidence in anthropology”, Anthropological Theory, Vol. 4 (4): 236- 245

Le Blanc, G, 2007 Vidas ordinarias, Vidas precarias. Sobre la exclusión social. Buenos Aires, Nueva Visión

Marchetti, AM, 2002 Carceral impoverishment. Class inequality in the French penitentiary. Ethnography 3 (4):416- 434

O’Brien, P, 2001 Making it in the “Free World”, Women in transition from prison. State University of New York Press

Richard, S y R Jones, 2004 Beating the perpetual incarceration machine: overcoming structural impediment to re- entry. En: Maruna, Shadd y Russ Immarigeon (edited by), After Crime and Punishment. Pathways to offender reintegration. William Publishing 201-232

Richie, B, 2001 Challenges Incarcerated Women Face as They Return to Their Communities: Findings From Life History Interview. Crime & Delincuency, Vol. 47 no. 3:368-389

Ricoeur, P 2004 La memoria, la historia y el olvido. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica

Taylor, C. 2005 La libertad de los modernos. Buenos Aires, Amorrortu Ediciones

Wacquant, L, 2000 Las cárceles de la miseria. Buenos Aires, Ediciones Manantial

Wacquant, L, 2002 The curious eclipse of prison ethnography in the age of mass incarceration. Ethnography, 3 (4):371-397

Published

2010-12-26

How to Cite

Kalinsky, B. (2010). The specificity of social research methodology when working with people on “probation.”The case of women “in transition”. Revista Del Museo De Antropología, 3(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v3.n1.5452

Issue

Section

Social Anthropology