Sexual dimorphism in guanacos (Lama guanicoe). An osteometric evaluation of postcranial elements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v2.n1.5417Keywords:
guanaco, sexual dimorphism, morphometry, pelvis, long bonesAbstract
In wild-living populations adult camelids are mainly sexed by observing their social and reproductive behavior, and on occasion, their genitalia. Both biologists and archaeologists usually assume the absence of clearly identifiable sexually dimorphic somatic and postcranial traits among adult guanaco (Lama guanicoe) specimens. The principal studies that evaluate the osteological differences between sexes in this species, had been carried out using qualitative morphological traits of the pelvis and morphometric traits of the skull. Therefore, the main objective of this paper is to contribute to the development of methodological tools aimed to accurately discriminate between sexes using morphometric techniques. In addition, we assess in this paper the existence and magnitude of the postcranial sex-related morphometric differences in a sample of modern guanaco specimens from Cinco Chañares, Río Negro, Argentina. The sample was composed by 32 individuals (8 males and 24 females) older than 30 month at the age of death. Fifty one hemipelvis, 40 humeri, 39 radioulnae, 40 femora, and 41 tibiae were measured. The obtained results show that the main morphometric differences between sexes are related to size and shape variation in the whole pelvis and acetabulum. In the appendicular skeleton no statistically significant differences between sexes were found, but this ought to be reevaluated increasing sample sizes of male specimens.Downloads
References
Cabrera, A. y A. Willink. 1980. Biogeografía de América Latina. Monografía 13. Secretaría General de la Organización de los Estados Americanos. Programa Regional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico. Washington D.C.
Cartajena, I. 2002. Los conjuntos arqueofaunísticos del Arcaico Temprano en la Puna de Atacama, Norte de Chile. Tesis Doctoral. Freie Universität Berlin. Impresa en microfilm, ABESY Vertriebs GMBH, Alemania. 204 pp.
Cartajena, I. 2007. Una propuesta metodológica para la estandarización de medidas en huesos cortos de camélidos y para la determinación de sexo. Werken 10: 49-62.
Crespo, E. A. 1988. Dinámica poblacional del lobo marino de un pelo, en el norte del litoral patagónico, Tesis doctoral inédita. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina.
Darroch, J. y J. Mosiman. 1985. Canonical and principal component of shape. Biométrika 72: 241–252.
Davis, S. J. 1987. The archaeology of animals. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Davis, S. J. 1996. Measurements of a group of adult female shetland sheep skeletons from a single flock: a baseline for zooarchaeologist. Journal of Archaeological Science 23: 593-612.
De Lamo, D. A. 1983. Estructura de edades de la población de guanacos, Chubut, Argentina. Informe presentado al Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). MS.
Determinación de edad en guanacos (Lama guanicoe Müller) por análisis del desarrollo y desgaste dentario. Veterinaria Argentina 7(69): 621-625.
Driesch, A. von den 1976. A guide to the measurement of animal bones from archaeological sites, Peabody Museum Bulletins (1). Harvard University.
Fritz, M. A. 1985. Population dynamics and preliminary estimates of the harvestability of the Patagonian guanaco. Tesis de Maestría inédita. Iowa State University. Ames, Iowa. 61 pp.
Greenfield, H. J. 2006.Sexing Fragmentary Ungulate Acetabulae. En Recent Advances in Ageing and Sexing Animal Bones, editado por D. Ruscillo, pp: 68-86. 9th ICAZ Conference, Durham.
Grigson, C. 1982. Sexing Neolithic domestic cattle skulls and horncores. En Ageing and sexing animal bones from archaeological sites, editado por B. Wilson, C. Grigson, y S. Payne, pp. 25-35. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.
Guarido, J. C. y M. Mazzitelli. 2003. Geografía. El Bajo del Gualicho. En Bajo del Gualicho: una planicie patagónica bajo el nivel del mar. Realidad y leyenda, editado por R. F. Masera y J. C. Guarido, pp. 25-57. Secretaria de Estado de Acción Social de río Negro. Carmen de Patagones, Río Negro.
Higham, C. F. W., Kijngam, A. y B. F. Manly. 1980. An analysis of prehistoric canid remains from Thailand. Journal of Archaeological Science 7: 149-165.
Kaufmann, C. A. 2009. Estructura de Edad y Sexo en Lama guanicoe (Guanaco). Estudios actualísticos y arqueológicos en Pampa y Patagonia. Sociedad Argentina de Antropología.
Kent, J. D. 1982. The Domestication and Exploitation of the South American Camelids: Methods of Analysis and their Application to Circum-lacustrine Archaeological Sites in Bolivia and Peru. Tesis Doctoral inédita, St. Louis, Washington University. 304 pp.
L´Heureux, G. L. 2008. El estudio arqueológico del proceso coevolutivo entre las poblaciones humanas y las poblaciones de guanacos en Patagonia Meridional y Norte de Tierra del Fuego. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1751. Archaeopress, Oxford.
L´Heureux, G. L. 2009a. Guía osteométrica de la cintura pélvica y del esqueleto axial de Lama guanicoe. MS.
L´Heureux, G. L. 2009b. Lama guanicoe (Müller 1776) body size in continental Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego. Trabajo presentado en el 10th International Mammalogical Congress, p. 138. Mendoza.
Lefèvre, C., S. Lepetz y L. Legoupil. 2003. Cazadores–Recolectores de Ponsonby (Patagonia Austral) y su Paleomabiente desde VI al III Milenio A.C. Magallania 31: 1-460.
Mengoni Goñalons, G. L. y H. D. Yacobaccio. 2006. The domestication of South American camelids. A view from the South-Central Andes. En Documenting domestication. New genetic and archaeological paradigms, editado por M. Zeder, D. Bradley, E. Emshwiller y B. Smith, pp.228-244. University of California Press.
Merino M. L. y J. L. Cajal. 1993. Estructura social de la población de guanacos (Lama guanicoe Müller, 1776) en la costa norte de Península Mitre, Tierra del Fuego. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 28(3):129-138.
Moore, K. 1989. Hunting and the origin of herding in Peru. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Michigan. Impresa en microfilm University Microfilm internacional, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Morello, J. 1958. La provincia fitogeográfica del Monte. Opera Lilloana 2: 1-155.
Morrison, D. y P. Whitridge. 1997. Estimating the Age and Sex of Caribou from Mandibular Measurements. Journal of Archaeological Science 24: 1093-1106.
O’Connor, T. 2006. Vertebrate demography by numbers: age, sex, and zooarchaeological practice. En Recent Advances in Ageing and Sexing Animal Bones, editado por D. Ruscillo, pp. 1-8. 9th ICAZ Conference, Durham.
Oporto, N., R. Bigatti y E. Larrieu.1979. Determinación de edades en guanaco (Lama guanicoe) en base a su dentición. Revista Argentina de producción animal 4(9): 965-983.
Prummel, W y H. Frisch. 1986. A guide to the distinction of species, sex and body side in bones of sheep and goats. Journal of Archaeological Science 13: 567-578.
Raedeke, K. 1978. El guanaco de Magallanes, Chile. Su distribución y biología. Ministerio de Agricultura de Chile, CONAF. Publicación Técnica 4. MS.
Raedeke, K. 1979. “Population dynamics and sociology of the guanaco (Lama guanicoe) of Magallanes, Chile”. Tesis Doctoral inédita. Universidad de Washington, Seattle.
Reher, C. A. y G. C. Frison. 1980. The Vore Site 48CK302: A Stratified Buffalo Jump in the Wyoming Black Hills. Memoir 6: 25(88): 1-190.
Reitz, E. J. y E. S. Wing. 1999. Zooarchaeology. Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ruscillo, D. 2003. Alternative methods for identifiying sex from archaeological animal bone. En Zooarchaeology in Greece: Recents Advances, editado por Kotjabopoulou, E., Hamilakis, Y., Halstead, P., Gamble, C. y P. Elephanti, pp. 37-44. London.
The Table Test: a Simple Technique for Sexing Canid Humeri. En Recent Advances in Ageing and Sexing Animal Bones, editado por D. Ruscillo, pp. 62-67. 9th ICAZ Conference, Durham.
Saba, S. L; D. De Lamo y S. Puig. 1995. Dinámica poblacional del guanaco. En Técnicas para el manejo del guanaco, editado por S. Puig, pp. 71-83. UICN, Mendoza.
Sedlácková, J. 2006. Environment, Body Size and Sexual Dimorphism in Late Glacial Reindeer. En Recent Advances in Ageing and Sexing Animal Bones, editado por D. Ruscillo, pp. 247-253. 9th ICAZ Conference, Durham.
SPSS V.15. 2006. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows. Version estándar. SPSS Inc. Chicago. Speth, J. 1983. Bison Kills and Bone Counts: Decision Making by Ancient Hunters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Steele T. E. 2002. Red deer: Their ecology and how they were hunted by Late Pleistocene hominids in western Europe. Tesis Doctoral inédita. Stanford University, Stanford.292 pp.
Steele T. E. 2003. Using Mortality profiles to infer behavior in the fossil record. Journal of Mammalogy, 84(2): 418-430.
Stiner, M. 1990. The use of mortality patterns in archaeological studies of hominid predatory adaptations. Journal of Anthropological Arqueology 9: 305-351.
SYSTAT 10.2. 2002. Statistics and statistical graphics software package. Systat Software Inc. Chicago.
Vilá, B. L. 2000 Comportamiento y organización social de la vicuña. En Manejo Sustentable de la Vicuña editado por Gonzales B., Bas F., Tala C., y A. Iriarte. Pp. 175-192. Servicio Agrícola ganadero. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, FIA. SAG. Santiago de Chile.
Weinstock, J. 2000. Osteometry as a source of refined demographic information: sex-ratios of reindeer, hunting strategies, and herd control in the Late Glacial site of Stellmoor, Northern Germany. Journal of Archaeological Science 27: 1187-1195.
Yacobaccio, H. D. 2006. Variables morfométricas de vicuñas (Vicugna vicugna vicugna) en Cieneguillas, Jujuy. En Investigación, conservación y manejo de vicuñas, editado por B. Vilá, pp. 101-112. Proyecto MACS-Argentina, Buenos Aires.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Those authors who have publications with this Journalaccept the following terms:
a. Authors will retain their copyrights and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and his first publication in this journal.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (eg, deposit it in an institutional electronic file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work on the Internet (eg in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access - El efecto del acceso abierto)
