Blood and ink marks: kinship-building substances and senses of family in an identity restitution case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v16.n2.38903Keywords:
Kinship, Restitution, Identity, Dictatorship, SubstanceAbstract
Based on an ethnography on the ways in which restituted grandchildren (re)build their kinship ties once its origin story is known, this article describes some stages of the singular restitution process of identity of María Carolina Guallane, a "granddaughter” who after searching for her biological ancestry built a way of naming, created her own identity marks and set up an expanded map of beloved persons. This is the biography of who, as a child, was appropriated as part of the systematic plan of theft of babies perpetrated by the last Argentine civic-military dictatorship (1976-1983), and who knew her origin story at the age of 23. At that age she became the "granddaughter 61"; the first who was looking for her biological family by own decision at a time (year 1998) when being a “daughter of the disappeared” still provoked fears and suspicions. The work aims to show the different substances that produce kinship and the plurality of connections that these enable, and also emphasize the distinction between origin and identity, seeking to transcend the opposition between the biological and the social when describing the wide inventory of understandings of what being a relative implies.
Downloads
References
Cadoret, A. (2004). Pluriparentesco y familia de referencia. En MARRE, D. & BESTARD, J. La adopción y el acogimiento: presente y perspectivas (pp. 273-283). Universitat de Barcelona.
Cardoso de Oliveira, R. (2006). Caminhos da identidade: Ensaios sobre etnicidade e multiculturalismo. Unesp.
Carsten, J. (2000a). Cultures of relatedness: New approaches to the study of kinship. Cambridge University Press.
Carsten, J. (2000b). Knowing where you´ve come from: ruptures and continuities of time and kinship in narratives of adoption reunions. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 6 (1): 687-703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00040
Carsten, J. (2004). After kinship. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800382
Carsten, J. (2007). Constitutive knowledge: tracing trajectories of information in new contexts of relatedness. Anthropological quarterly. 80 (2): 403-426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2007.0020
Carsten, J. (2014). A matéria do parentesco. Revista de Antropologia da Ufscar - R@U. 6 (2): 103-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52426/rau.v6i2.125
Da Silva Catela, L. (2005). Un juego de espejos: violencia, nombres, identidades. Un análisis antropológico sobre las apropiaciones de niños durante la última dictadura militar argentina. Telar. 2 (2-3): 125-140.
Da Silva Catela, L. (2014a). Lo que merece ser recordado. Conflictos y tensiones
en torno a los proyectos públicos sobre los usos del pasado en los sitios de memoria. Clepsidra: Revista Interdisciplinaria de Estudios sobre Memoria. 1 (1): 28-47.
Da Silva Catela, L. (2014b). No habrá flores en la tumba del pasado: la experiencia de reconstrucción del mundo de los familiares de desaparecidos. Ediciones al Margen & Ediciones del Pasaje.
Finamori, S. (2012). Os sentidos da paternidade: dos “pais desconhecidos” ao exame de DNA. (Tesis de Doctorado, Unicamp). Campinas: Unicamp.
Fonseca, C. (2010). Direito às origens: segredo e desigualdade no controle de informações sobre a identidade pessoal. Revista de Antropologia da USP. 53 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/2179-0892.ra.2010.36434
Fonseca, C. (2011). As novas tecnologias legais na produção da vida familiar: Antropologia, direito e subjetividades. Civitas. 11 (1): 8-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2011.1.9188
Gesteira, S. (2013). Buscando el origen: Sentidos sobre la filiación y el parentesco en la organización Raíz Natal “Por el Derecho a la Identidad Biológica” (Tesis de Maestría, Universidad de Buenos Aires).
Gesteria, S. (2014). Buscar el “origen biológico”. Parentesco y familia en organizaciones de personas “adoptadas”. KAIROS Revista de Temas Sociales. Año 18. Nº 33.
Hall, S. (2011). Quem precisa de identidade. En SILVA, Tomaz Tadeu (org.) Identidade e diferença, a perspectiva dos estudos culturais (pp. 103-133). Vozes.
Howell, S. (2006). The kinning of foreigners: transnational adoption in a global perspective. Berghahn Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1x76frr
Jociles, M. & Lores, F. (2021). Genética y voluntad procreativa: ¿cuál es “el origen” de los hijos concebidos mediante donación reproductiva? En DÍAZ DE RADA, A. (ed.). Orígenes. Una puerta sin retorno al laberinto de las génesis (pp. 81-110). Trotta.
Kofes, S. & Manica, D. (2015). Vidas & grafias. Narrativas antropológicas, entre biografia e etnografia. Rio de Janeiro: Lamparina Editora & FAPERJ.
Martínez, M. J. (2010). La producción social de la filiación y la construcción de una paternidad. En VILLALTA, C. (Comp.) Infancia, justicia y derechos humanos. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
Ouellette, F. (1998). Les usages contemporains de l’adoption. En FINE, Agnès (Org.). Adoptions: ethnologie des parentés choisies (pp. 153-176). Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionsmsh.621
Regueiro, S. (2009). Restitución de niños desaparecidos: usos políticos del parentesco en la Justicia. Antropolítica: Revista contemporânea de antropologia. 26 (1): 37-62.
Regueiro, S. (2010). Análisis genético para la identificación de niños apropiados: construcción política y científica de la “naturaleza” y el parentesco. Revista Estudos Feministas. 18 (1): 11-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-026X2010000100002
Segalen, M. (2009). Memorias y recomposiciones familiares. Revista de Antropología Social. 18 (1):171-185.
Segalen, M. (2013). Sociología de la Familia. Eudem.
Strathern, M. (1991). Parentesco por iniciativa: a possibilidade de escolha dos consumidores e as novas tecnologias da reprodução. Análise Social. 114 (1): 1011-1022.
Strathern, M. (1999). Refusing information. Property, substance and effect: Anthropological essays on persons and things (pp. 64-86). Athlone Press.
Tello Weiss, M. (2019). El represor como antropólogo: apuntes para la lectura etnográfica de un manuscrito contrainsurgente. Corpus. 9 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/corpusarchivos.3092
Villalta, C. (2009). De secuestros y adopciones: el circuito institucional de la apropiación criminal de niños en Argentina (1976-1983). Historia Crítica. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7440/histcrit38.2009.08
Villalta, C. (2012). Entregas y secuestros: El rol del Estado en la apropiación de niños. Editores del Puerto.
Vom Bruck, G. & Bodenhorn, B. (2006). An Anthropology of Names and Naming. Cambridge University Press.
Weston, K. (2013). Las familias que elegimos: lesbianas, gays y parentesco. Bellaterra
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jimena María Massa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this Journalaccept the following terms:
a. Authors will retain their copyrights and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and his first publication in this journal.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (eg, deposit it in an institutional electronic file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work on the Internet (eg in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access - El efecto del acceso abierto)
