A History of Lithic Technological Studies in the Paleoindian Archaeology in the United States of America
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v16.n1.38778Keywords:
Lithic analysis, Lithic technology, History of archaeology, North American archaeology, Paleoindian, Clovis, FolsomAbstract
Lithic analyses have long been at the core of Paleoindian studies in the United States, but despite crucial changes in method and orientation, the earliest typological approaches continue to exert a strong influence on archaeologists’ understanding of Paleoindian assemblages. This chapter argues against these normative approaches by advocating in favor of dynamic perspectives on human behavior. It does so by outlining the historical contributions of technological studies to the discipline, from the early European influences to the more holistic frameworks used today. Our discussion underscores three fundamental phases of development, starting with key experimental work on the Folsom point in the mid-twentieth century. This led to an increased focus on the technological aspects of tool production and use. The second phase is heavily influenced by the development of processual archaeology, which had a profound effect on the conceptualization of lithic assemblages. It generated a wealth of systems-oriented approaches focused on the economy of lithic raw materials. Finally, and most recently, the boom in cultural ecological studies has again reshaped this landscape by creating modes of analysis that understand lithic technology as a strategic adaptation rather than a cultural fossil. To integrate these developments within the broader field of Paleoindian studies, we consider seminal papers and their role in heralding new orientations, alongside data illustrating these trends in publication.
Downloads
References
Akerman, K., & Fagan, J. L. (1986). Fluting the Lindenmeier Folsom: A Simple and Economical Solution to the Problem, and Its Implications for Other Fluted Point Technologies. Lithic Technology, 15(1), 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01977261.1986.11720860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.1986.11720860
Amick, D. S. (2007). Investigating the behavioral causes and archaeological effects of lithic recycling. In S. P. McPherron (Ed.), Tools Versus Cores: Alternative Approaches to Stone Tool Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Bamforth, D. B., & Bleed, P. (1997). Technology, Flaked Stone Technology, and Risk. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 7(1), 31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/ap3a.1997.7.1.109
Bernstein, D. J., & Lenardi, M. J. (2005). Glacial Erratics as Sources of Lithic Raw Material: The McGregor Site on Long Island, New York. Lithic Technology, 30(2), 145–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2005.11721031
Binford, L. R. (1962). Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity, 28(2), 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/278380
Binford, L. R. (1968). Some Comments on Historical versus Processual Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 24(3), 267-275. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.24.3.3629348
Binford, L. R., & Binford, S. R. (1966). A Preliminary Analysis of Functional Variability in the Mousterian of Levallois Facies. American Anthropologist, 68(2), 238-295. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1525/aa.1966.68.2.02a001030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1966.68.2.02a001030
Bleed, P. (2001). Trees or chains, links or branches: conceptual alternatives for consideration of stone tool production and other sequential activities. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 8(1), 101–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009526016167
Bordes, F. (1955). Le Paléolithique inférieur et moyen de Jabrud (Syrie) et la question du Pré-Aurignacien. l’Anthropologie, 59(5-6), 486-507.
Bowman, D. L., & Givens, D. R. (1996). Stratigraphic Excavation: The First “New Archaeology”. American Anthropologist, 98(1), 80-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1996.98.1.02a00080
Brantingham, P. J. (2003). A Neutral Model of Stone Raw Material Procurement. American Antiquity, 68(03), 487-509. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0002731600048034/type/journal_article DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3557105
Buchanan, B., Andrews, B., Kilby, J. D., & Eren, M. I. (2019). Settling into the country: Comparison of Clovis and Folsom lithic networks in western North America shows increasing redundancy of toolstone use. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 53, 32-42. Retrieved from https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S027841651830014X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2018.10.004
Callahan, E. (1976). A Lithic Workshop Symposium. Lithic Technology, 5(1-2), 3-5. doi:10.1080/01977261.1976.11754413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.1976.11754413
Callahan, E. (1977). Variability in the early stages of manufacture of Virginia fluted points. (M.A.). Catholic University of America,
Callahan, E. (1979). The Basics of Biface Knapping in the Eastern Fluted Point Tradition: A Manual for Flintknappers and Lithic Analysts. Archaeology of Eastern North America, 7(1), 1-180.
Collins, M. B. (1974). A Functional Analysis of Lithic Technology Among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers of Southwestern France and Western Texas. University of Arizona, Tuscon.
Collins, M. B. (1975). Lithic Technology as a Means of Processual Inference. In E. H. Swanson (Ed.), Lithic Technology. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Crabtree, D. (1966). A Stoneworker’s Approach to Analyzing and Replicating the Lindenmeier Folsom. Tebiwa, 9, 3-39.
Eren, M. I., Lycett, S. J., Patten, R. J., Buchanan, B., Pargeter, J., & O’Brien, M. J. (2016). Test, Model, and Method Validation: The Role of Experimental Stone Artifact Replication in Hypothesis-driven Archaeology. Ethnoarchaeology, 8(2), 103-136. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19442890.2016.1213972 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19442890.2016.1213972
Flenniken, J. J. (1978). Reevaluation of the Lindenmeier Folsom: A Replication Experiment in Lithic Technology. American Antiquity, 43(3), 473-480. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0002731600080203/type/journal_article DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/279406
Frison, G. C., & Bradley, B. A. (1982). Fluting of Folsom Projectile Points. In G. C. Frison & D. Stanford (Eds.), The Agate Basin Site: A Record of the Paleoindian Occupation of the Northwestern High Plains (pp. 209-212). New York: Academic Press, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2sx9g56.16
Goodyear, A. C. (1989). A Hypothesis for the Use of Cryptocrystalline Raw Materials Among Paleoindian Groups of North America. In C. Ellis & J. Lothorop (Eds.), Eastern Paleoindian Lithic Source Use. Boulder: Westview Press.
Holmes, W. H. (1890). A Quarry Workshop of the Flaked-Stone Implement Makers in the District of Columbia. American Anthropologist, 3(1), 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1890.3.1.02a00020
Holmes, W. H. (1892). Modern Quarry Refuse and the Palaeolithic Theory. Science, 20(512), 285-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ns-20.512.295
Ingbar, E. E. (1994). Lithic Material Selection and Technological Organization. In P. J. Carr (Ed.), The Organization of North American Prehistoric Chipped Stone Tool Technologies. Ann Arbor.
Irwin, H. T. (1967). The Itama: late Pleistocene inhabitants of the Plains of the United States and Canada and the American Southwest. In A. Harvard University. Department of (Ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Irwin, H. T., & Wormington, H. M. (1970). Paleo-Indian Tool Types in the Great Plains. American Antiquity, 35(1), 24-34. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0002731600084237/type/journal_article DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/278175
Jennings, T. A., Smallwood, A. M., & Pevny, C. D. (2021). Reviewing the Role of Experimentation in Reconstructing Paleoamerican Lithic Technologies. PaleoAmerica, 7(1), 53-67. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20555563.2020.1848269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2020.1848269
Johnson, L. L., Behm, J. A., Bordes, F., Cahen, D., Crabtree, D. E., Dincauze, D. F., . . . Sheets, P. D. (1978). A History of Flint-Knapping Experimentation, 1838-1976 [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology, 19(2), 337-372. Retrieved from https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/202078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/202078
Kelly, R. L., & Todd, L. C. (1988). Coming into the Country: Early Paleoindian Hunting and Mobility. American Antiquity, 53(2), 231-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/281017
Knudson, R. (1970). Organizational Variability in Late Paleo-Indian Assemblages. Retrieved from
Knudson, R. (1982). Don E. Crabtree, 1912–1980. American Antiquity, 47(2), 336-343. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0002731600061229/type/journal_article DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002731600061229
Knudson, R. (1983). Organizational Variability in Late Paleo-Indian Assemblages. Retrieved from
Knudson, R. (2009). The Early Expeditions: University of Wyoming, Harvard University, and the Peabody Museum. In M. L. Larson, M. Kornfeld, & G. C. Frison (Eds.), Hell Gap: A Stratified Paleoindian Campsite at the Edge of the Rockies (pp. 14-35). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Kolhatkar, M. (2022). Analyzing skill in lithic dispersions using width, thickness and width-by-thickness ratio. Lithic Technology, 47(4), 354-371. doi:10.1080/01977261.2022.2084228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.2022.2084228
LaBelle, J. M. (2004). The Professional and The Amateur, Yesterday and Today. Central States Archaeological Journal, 51(2), 123-125.
Meltzer, D. J. (1983). The Antiquity of Man and the Development of American Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 6, 1-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-003106-1.50006-7
Meltzer, D. J. (2003). Peopling of North America. In Developments in Quaternary Sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 539-563): Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1571-0866(03)01026-1
Meltzer, D. J. (2015). Pleistocene Overkill and North American Mammalian Extinctions. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44(1), 33–53. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013854 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-013854
Meltzer, D. J., Todd, L. C., & Holliday, V. T. (2002). The Folsom (Paleoindian) Type Site: Past Investigations, Current Studies. American Antiquity, 67(1), 5–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2694875
Nami, H. G. (2019). Errett H. Callahan (1937-2019): Researcher, flintknapper, and artist. Journal of Lithic Studies, 6(1), 1-12. doi:10.2218/jls.4124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.4124
Odell, G. (2005). Lithic Analysis. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
Pollock, S. G., Hamilton, N. D., & Bonnichsen, R. (1999). Chert from the Munsungen Lake Formation (Maine) in Palaeoamerican archaeological sites in northeastern North America: recognition of its occurrence and distribution. Journal of Archaeological Science, 26(3), 269–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1998.0335
Ray, C. N. (1938). The Clear Fork Culture Complex. TexasArcheological and Paleontological Society, Bulletin, 10, 193-207.
Renaud, E.-B. (1937). Les Pointes américaines de Folsom et de Yuma. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique de France, 34(10), 449-457. Retrieved from https://www.persee.fr/doc/bspf_0249-7638_1937_num_34_10_5505 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.1937.5505
Renaud, E. B. (1928). L’Antiquite de l’homme dans l’Amerique du Nord.
Roberts, F. H. H. J. (1935). A Folsom Complex: Preliminary Report on Investigations at the Lindenmeier Site in Northern Colorado (Vol. 4). Washington, D.C.: The Smithsonian Institution.
SAA. (1989). 1989 Crabtree Award for Avocational Archaeology. American Antiquity, 54(4), 681-682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002731600075004
Seebach, J. D. (2006). Drought or Development? Patterns of Paleoindian Site Discovery on the Great Plains of North America. Plains Anthropologist, 51(197), 71-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/pan.2006.004
Shott, M. J. (2017). Stage and continuum approaches in prehistoric biface production: A North American perspective. PLOS ONE, 12(3), e0170947. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170947
Smith, H. L., & Tune, J. W. (2019). Variation in fluted-point technology: investigations across space and time. PaleoAmerica, 5(2), 105-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2019.1618176
Sollberger, J. B. (1985). A Technique For Folsom Fluting. Lithic Technology, 14(1), 41-50. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01977261.1985.11754501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01977261.1985.11754501
Spiess, A., Wilson, D., & Bradley, J. (1998). Paleoindian occupation in the New England-Maritimes region: Beyond cultural ecology. Archaeology of Eastern North America, 26(1998), 201–264.
Trigger, B. (1991). Constraint and Freedom - A New Synthesis for Archeological Explanation. American Anthropologist, 93(3), 551-569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1991.93.3.02a00010
Wargo, M. C. (2009). The Bordes-Binford Debate: Transatlantic Interpretive Traditions in Paleolithic Archaeology. University of Texas, Arlington.
Williams, T. J., & Madsen, D. B. (2020). The Upper Paleolithic of the Americas. PaleoAmerica, 6(1), 4-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2019.1606668
Wilmsen, E. N., & Robert, F. H. J. (1978). Lindenmeier, 1934-1974: Concluding report on investigations. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.24.1
Yerkes, R. W., & Kardulias, P. N. (1993). Recent developments in the analysis of lithic artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Research, 1(2), 89-119. doi:10.1007/BF01326933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326933
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bethany Potter, Frederic Sellet
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this Journalaccept the following terms:
a. Authors will retain their copyrights and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and his first publication in this journal.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (eg, deposit it in an institutional electronic file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work on the Internet (eg in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access - El efecto del acceso abierto)
