For a Sociology of Flesh and Blood
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v12.n1.24166Keywords:
Action, Structure, Knowledge, Body, Incarnation, Habitus, Social Ontology, Observant participation, Enactive ethnography, Bourdieu, PascalAbstract
This article elaborates the social ontology and methodology of carnal sociology as a distinctive mode of social inquiry eschewing the spectatorial posture to grasp action-in-the-making, in the wake of debates triggered by my apprenticeship-based study of boxing as a plebeian bodily craft. First I critique the notions of (dualist) agent, (externalist) structure, and (mentalist) knowledge prevalent in the contemporary social sciences and sketch an alternative conception of the social animal, not just as wielder of symbols, but as sensate, suffering, skilled, sedimented, and situated creature of flesh and blood. I spotlight the primacy of embodied practical knowledge arising out of and continuously enmeshed in webs of action and consider what modes of inquiry are suited to deploying and mining this incarnate conception of the agent. I argue that enactive ethnography, the brand of immersive fieldwork based on “performing the phenomenon,” is a fruitful path toward capturing the cognitive, conative, and cathectic schemata (habitus) that generate the practices and underlie the cosmos under investigation. But it takes social spunk and persistence to reap the rewards of “observant participation” and achieve social competency (as distinct from empirical saturation). In closing, I return to Bourdieu’s dialogue with Pascal to consider the special difficulty and urgency of capturing the “spirit of acuteness” that animates such competency but vanishes from normal sociological accounts. [As published in Loïc Wacquant Qual. Sociol. (2015) 38:1–11]Downloads
References
Adloff, Frank, Gerund Katharina, y Kaldewey (eds.). 2014. En Revealing tacit knowledge: Embodiment and explication. Berlin: Transcript Verlag DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/transcript.9783839425169
Anscombe, G.E.M. 1957/2000. Intention. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Auyero, Javier (ed.). 2005. Número especial Qualitative Sociology sobre Cuerpo y Alma. Qualitative Sociology 28(2): 141–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-005-4209-3
Behar, R. 1996. The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston: Beacon.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1980/1990. Le Sens pratique. Paris: Éditions de Minuit (El Sentido práctico, Siglo XXI Editores: México).
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1997/2000. Méditations pascaliennes. Paris: Éditions du Seuil (Meditaciones pascalianas, Anagrama: Barcelona).
Bourgois, Philippe, y Jeff Schonberg. 2009. Righteous dopefiend. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cassell, J. 1991. Expected miracles: Surgeons at work. Filadelfia: Temple University Press.
Cassirer, E. 1944. An essay on man. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Chemero, A. 2013. Radical embodied cognitive science. Review of General Psychology 17(2): 145–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032923
Clark, A. 1999. An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(9): 345–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01361-3
Corbin, Alain. 1988. Le Territoire du vide. L’Occident et le désir du rivage, 1750–1840. Paris: Aubier.
Damasio, A.R. 1999. The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Faubion, J.D., y G.E. Marcus (eds.). 2009. Fieldwork is not what it used to be: Learning anthropology’s method in a time of transition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Force, P. 2003. Géométrie, finesse, et premiers principes chez Pascal. Romance Quarterly 50(2): 121–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08831150309604851
Geertz, Clifford. 1974. “From the native’s point of view”: On the nature of anthropological understanding. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3822971
Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences 26–45 (re-editado en: Local knowledge: Further essays in the interpretation of cultures, 55–7, Nueva York, Basic Books).
Ginzburg, C. 1976. Il formaggio e i vermi. Turín: Einaudi.
Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Nueva York: Anchor.
Gowan, T. 2010. Hobos, hustlers, and backsliders: Homeless in San Francisco. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816648696.001.0001
Howes, D. 2003. Sensual relations: Engaging the senses in culture and social theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11852
Hollis, M. 1977. Models of man: Philosophical thoughts on social action. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621178
Lakoff, G., y M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western Thought. Nueva York: Basic books.
Leder, D. 1990. Flesh and blood: A proposed supplement to Merleau-Ponty. Human Studies 13(3): 209–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142754
Lüdtke, A. 1993. Eigen-Sinn: Fabrikalltag, Arbeitererfahrungen und Politik vom Kaiserreich bis in den Faschismus. Hamburgo: Ergebnisse.
Malinowski, B. 1922/2014. Argonauts of the western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. Londres: Routledge.
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1945/1962. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
Merton, R. 1976. Structural analysis in sociology. En Approaches to the study of social structure, ed. P. Blau, 21–52. Londres: Open Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2391864
Noë, A. 2004. Action in perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pascal, B. 1657/1985. De l’Esprit géométrique. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion.
Pascal, B. 1670/1976. Pensées. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion.
Purser, G. 2012. “Still doin’ time”: Clamoring for work in the day labor industry. Working USA: The Journal of Labor & Society 15(3): 397–415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-4580.2012.00400.x
Purser, G. 2015. Labor on demand: Dispatching the urban poor. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Searle, J. 2009. Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001
Shapiro, L. (ed.). 2014. The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition. Londres: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775845
Snow, D.A., y L. Anderson. 1993. Down on their luck: A study of homeless street people. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Stam, H J. (ed.). 2009. Special section on habitus in the work of Loïc Wacquant. Theory & Psychology 19(6): 707–777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309350542
Sutherland, E y H. J. Locke. 1936. Twenty thousand homeless men: A study of unemployed men in the Chicago shelter. Chicago: Lippincott (re-edición Nueva York, Arno Press, 1971).
Varela, F., E. Thompson y E. Rosch. 1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001
Wacquant, L. 2000/2004. Body and soul: Notebooks of an apprentice boxer. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. Nueva edición ampliada 2014.
Wacquant, L. 2002. Scrutinizing the street: Poverty, morality, and the pitfalls of urban ethnography. American Journal of Sociology 107(6): 1468–1532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/340461
Wacquant, L. 2009. The body, the ghetto and the penal state. Qualitative Sociology 32(1): 101–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-008-9112-2
Wacquant, L. 2011. Habitus as topic and tool: Reflections on becoming a Prizefighter. Qualitative Research in Psychology 8(1): 81–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2010.544176
Wacquant, L. 2014a. Homines in extremis: What fighting scholars teach us about habitus. Body & Society 20(2): 3–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X13501348
Wacquant, L. 2014b. Putting habitus in its place: A response to the symposium. Body & Society 20(2): 118– 139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X14530845
Wacquant, L. The Prizefighter’s three bodies: Steps to a carnal sociology. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. En prensa.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Those authors who have publications with this Journalaccept the following terms:
a. Authors will retain their copyrights and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons) that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and his first publication in this journal.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (eg, deposit it in an institutional electronic file or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work on the Internet (eg in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The Effect of Open Access - El efecto del acceso abierto)
