Taxonomies of Free and Open Source Software Companies. Its limitations based on cases of Argentine SMEs

Authors

  • Hernán Alejandro Morero Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad (CIECS) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas (CONICET). Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Instituto de Economía y Finanzas (Córdoba, Argentina)
  • Juan Gabriel Vélez Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas (CONICET). Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Instituto de Economía y Finanzas (Córdoba, Argentina)
  • Ignacio Juncos Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Secretaría de Ciencia y Tecnología. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Instituto de Economía y Finanzas (Córdoba, Argentina)
  • Jorge José Motta Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Económicas (CICE). Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Instituto de Economía y Finanzas (Córdoba, Argentina)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55444/2451.7321.2023.v61.n1.44198

Keywords:

SMEs, Software, Open Source

Abstract

The creation of the Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) and its growth, have modified the value chain of the software industry. However, there isn’t good statistical information showing the importance and the role in the economy of the FLOSS firms. This article aimed to contribute to the improvement of the data collection and the discussion about the way of categorization of the FLOSS firms. The methodology was qualitative, drew on seven case studies of Argentineans FLOSS SME, focusing on the degree of collaboration with the FLOSS community and its business model. This allowed to make a critical analysis of the current categorization of FLOSS firms in the literature, as a first step in the way to developing a typology of FLOSS firms feasible of be identified in technological surveys.

Reception date: 03/05/2023
Acceptance date: 24/11/2023

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bonaccorsi, A.; Giannangeli, S. y Rossi, C. (2006). Entry strategies under competing standards: Hybrid business models in the open source software industry. Management Science, 52 (7), 1085-98.

Dahlander, L. y Magnusson, M. G. (2005). Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms. Research policy, 34(4), 481- 93.

Denzin, N. K. y Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-50.

Harison, E. y Koski, H. (2010). Applying open innovation in business strategies: Evidence from Finnish software firms. Research policy, 39(3), 351-59.

Hecker, F. (1999). Setting up shop: The business of open-source software. IEEE software, 16(1), Disponible en: http://hecker.org/writings/setting-up-shop.

Lavarello, P. J. y Sarabia, M. (2015). La política industrial en la Argentina durante la década de 2000. CEPAL.

Lerner, J. y Schankerman, M. (2013). The comingled code: Open source and economic development. The MIT Press.

Raymond, E. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 12(3), 23-49.

Stallman, R. (1983). El manifiesto de GNU. GNU operating system. https://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.es.html.

UNCTAD (2012). Information Economy Report 2012. Disponible en: https://unctad.org/publication/information-economy-report-2012.

UNU MERIT y Berlecon Research. (2002). FLOSS FINAL REPORT. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/4826hRT

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.

Published

2023-12-30

Issue

Section

ARTÍCULOS

How to Cite

Taxonomies of Free and Open Source Software Companies. Its limitations based on cases of Argentine SMEs. (2023). Revista De Economía Y Estadística, 61(1), 119-154. https://doi.org/10.55444/2451.7321.2023.v61.n1.44198