Government Fiscal and Real Economy Responses to the Crises: Automatic Stabilisers versus Automatic Stabilisation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55444/2451.7321.2010.v48.n1.3869Keywords:
automatic stabilisers , European Economic Recovery Programme (EERP), budget, discretionary policiesAbstract
This paper looks at the discretionary fi scal and real economy support measures introduced by EMU Member States in response to the crises. The analyses build on a data base assembled by the Commission on individual crises response measures with a view to survey the implementation of the European Economic Recovery Programme (EERP). The paper first provides a broad overview of the types of crises-related measures taken, including broad estimates of their budgetary dimension. On this basis it appears that on an aggregate level, the discretionary support has been in line with agreed principles of being timely, temporary and targeted. Member States with restricted fi scal space has overall taken a more restrictive stance than those with more room of manoeuvre. The paper then looks at how these discretionary measures complement the "automatic" budget tabilisation. It appears that, in budgetary terms, about half of the discretionary measures add to the areas already covered by automatic stabilisers while the other half address other areas such as investments, industrial sectors and vulnerable groups particularly hit by the crises. The overall experience may suggest that it has been helpful with agreed ex-ante principles for how discretionary stimuli should be provided and that the provision of discretionary stimulus under such conditionality can work to strengthen the budgetary stabilisation capacity in a flexible way.
Downloads
References
Andres, Javier & Domenech, Rafael & Fatas, Antonio, 2008. "The stabilizing role of government size," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 571-593, February.
Antonio Fatas & Ilian Mihov, 2009. "The Euro and Fiscal Policy," NBER Working Papers 14722, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Antonio Fatás, Ilian Mihov , 2003 "The Case for Restricting Fiscal Policy Discretion" The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 118, No. 4 (Nov., 2003), pp. 1419-1447 Published by: The MIT Press
Baunsgaard, Thomas and Symansky, Steven A "Automatic fiscal stabilizers", IMF position note, September 28, 2009.
Buti, Martinez-Mongay, Sekkat, van den Noord; Automatic Fiscal Stabilisers in EMU: A Conflict between Efficiency and Stabilisation? CESifo Economic Studies, 2003; 49: 123 - 140.
Darby and Melitz, 2008 "Automatic stabilizers", Economic Policy, October 2008
Deroose, Larch, Schaechter, 2008 "Constricted, lame and pro-cyclical? Fiscal policy in the euro area revisited" European Economy. Economic Papers. 353. December 2008.
European Commission (a), Public Finances in EMU-2003, Part V "Meeting the EU's budgetary requirements: national expenditure rules and fiscal relations across levels of government"
European Commission (b), "The EU's response to support the real economy during the economic crises: an overview of Member States' recovery measures", Occasional Paper 51, July 2009
Fatas, Antonio & Mihov, Ilian, 2001. "Government size and automatic stabilizers: international and intranational evidence," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 3-28, October.
Girouard, Nathalie and André, Christophe 2005 “Measuring Cyclically-adjusted Budget Bqlqnces for OECD countries”, OECD Economic Department Working Papers No.434, July 2005.
Girouard, Nathalie and Price, Robert 2004 “Asset Price Cycles, One-off” factors and structural Budget Balances”, OECD Economic Department Working Papers No.391, July 2004.
Seidman, Laurence S & Lewis, Kenneth A, 2002."A New Design for Automatic Fiscal Policy," International Finance, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 251-84, Summer.
SOU 2002:16, Statens Offentliga Utredningar, "Stabilization policy in the monetary union", 2002.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Jonas Fischer, Isabelle Justo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain their copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which is simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows third parties to share the work provided that its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing arrangements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. depositing it in an institutional telematic archive or publishing it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work via the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The Open Access Effect)
