Olive Firms’ Interactions and Innovation Efforts in the Regional Innovation System of La Rioja, Argentina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55444/2451.7321.2020.v58.n1.31871Keywords:
innovation efforts, interactions, regional innovation system, olive sectorAbstract
The present research studies the role of firms’ interactions within the Regional Innovation System (RIS) in relation to their innovation efforts for the olive sector in La Rioja, Argentina. Empirical analysis is based on information gained from a survey conducted by the National University of Chilecito in 2012. Quasi-Poisson and Binomial Logistic regressions are built in order to deal with statistical data. The main findings show an association between interactions established by firms and their innovative activities, as well as the relevance of relationships with certain science and technology organizations. However, heterogeneity amongst firms and RIS weaknesses would limit smaller firms’ performance.
Date received: February 12, 2020
Acceptance date: June 8, 2020
Downloads
References
Asheim, B. T. (2001). Localised Learning, Innovation and Regional Clusters. Cluster Policies – Cluster Development, Nordregio Report 2001(2), 39-58.
Asheim, B. T. and Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge Bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters. Research Policy, (34), 1173-1190.
Borello, J. (2015). Geografía de la innovación en la Argentina: primer análisis regional basado en datos sobre PYMES. Locale, 1(1), 71-95.
Camagni, R. and Capello, R. (1998). Innovation and Performance of SMEs in Italy: The relevance of Spatial Aspects. Competition & Change, 3(1-2), 69-106.
Cassiolato, J. E. and Lastres, H. M. (2005). Systems of Innovation, Clusters and Industrial Districts: Analytical and Policy Implications of Convergence and Differences in the Approaches [Paper presentation]. III Globelics Conference, Sudáfrica.
Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G. and Etxebarria, G. (1998). Regional Systems of Innovation: an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning, 30(9), 1563-1584.
Fritsch, M. and Franke, G. (2004). Innovation, Regional Knowledge Spillovers and R&D Cooperation. Research Policy, 33, 245-255.
Gennero de Rearte, A. M., Lanari, M. E. and Alegre, P. (1999). Capacidad innovativa de núcleos impulsores de firmas en entornos territoriales dinámicos. El caso de Mar del Plata, Argentina. In J. Cassiolato and H. Lastres (Eds.), Experiencias de sistemas locales en el Mercosur (pp. 543-568). IBICT.
Greene, W. (1999). Análisis Econométrico. Prentice Hall Iberia.
Intarakumnerd, P., and Vang, J. (2006). Clusters and Innovation Systems in Asia. Science, Technology & Society, 11(1), 1-7.
Jiménez F., Fernández de Lucio, I. and Menéndez, A. (2011). Los sistemas regionales de innovación: experiencias concretas en América. In J. Llisterri and C. Pietrobelli (Eds.), Los sistemas regionales de innovación en América Latina (pp. 58-103). Inter-American Development Bank.
Klein, M. and Sauer, A. (2016). Celebrating 30 Years of Innovation System Research: What you need to know about Innovation Systems. Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences, (17), 1-47.
Krätke, S. (2010). Regional Knowledge Networks: a Network Analysis approach to the Interlinking of Knowledge resources. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(1), 83-97.
Lau, A. K.W. and Lo, W. (2015). Regional Innovation System, Absorptive Capacity and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92(C), 99-114.
Lavía, C., Otero B. and Albizu, E. (2011). Innovación y territorio. Una encuesta a pequeñas y medianas empresas industriales. International Journal of Sociology, 69(2), 461-486.
Law N° 22.021 (1979). Ley de Promoción Industrial. Promoción a las provincias de San Luis, La Rioja y Catamarca. Boletín Oficial (B.O.: 04/07/79). Buenos Aires.
Ligenzowska, J. (2016). Regional Innovation Systems in Sweden. Ekonomia Międzynarodowa, (16), 388-405.
Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007). National Innovation Systems - Analytical Concept and Development Tool. Industry and innovation, 14(1), 95-119.
McDermott, G., Corredoira, R. and Kruse, G. (2006). Public-private Networks as Sources of Knowledge and Upgrading Capabilities: Lessons from the Transformation of the Argentine Wine Industry [Paper presentation]. Research Workshop on Institutions and Organization IBMEC, San Pablo, Brasil.
Natário, M. M., Braga, A. M. M., Couto, J. P., and Tiago, M. T. B. (2012). Estándares Territoriales de Innovación: Análisis de las Regiones de Portugal. Revista de estudios regionales, (95), 15-38.
Niembro, A. (2017). Hacia una primera tipología de los sistemas regionales de innovación en Argentina. Journal of Regional Research, (38), 117-149.
Padilla Pérez, R. (Ed.). (2013). Sistemas de innovación en Centroamérica. Fortalecimiento a través de la integración regional. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).
Pasciaroni, C. (2015). Organizaciones de conocimiento y sistemas regionales de innovación en países en desarrollo. Estudio de caso para argentina. Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 15(2), 173-186.
Rodríguez, A., and Villarreal Peralta, E. M. (2015). Innovation and Regional Growth in Mexico: 2000-2010. Growth and Change, 46(2), pp. 172-195.
Sánches, P. (2013). Análisis de diagnóstico tecnológico sectorial –olivarero. Estudios de análisis de diagnóstico tecnológico sectorial. Secretary of Planning and Policy on Science. Ministry of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation.
Sánches, P. (2012). Análisis Tecnológico Sectorial. Cuadros de Situación Tecnológica Complejo Productivo: Olivarero. Interdisciplinary Center for Studies in Science, Technology and Innovation (CIECTI), N° 2.
Sanchez, G. and Bisang, R. (2011). Learning Networks in Innovation Systems at Sector / Regional Level in Argentina: Winery and Dairy Industries. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(4), 15-32.
Tödtling, F., Lehner, P. and Kaufmann, A. (2008). Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions?. SRE - Discussion Papers 2008/01, Institut für Regional- und Umweltwirtschaft, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
Trippl, M., Asheim, B. and Miorner, J. (2015). Identification of regions with less developed research and innovation systems. Papers in Innovation Studies, (2015/1).
Vita Serman, F. and Matías, C. (2013). Cadena Olivo. Fruit Tree National Programme. National Institute of Agricultural Technology.
Yoguel, G., Borello, J. A. and Erbes, A. (2009). Argentina: cómo estudiar y actuar sobre los sistemas locales de innovación. ECLAC Journal, 99.
Yoguel, G. and Erbes. A. (2007). Competencias tecnológicas y desarrollo de vinculaciones en la trama automotriz argentina en el período post-Devaluación. Research’s laboratory on technology, work, enterprise and competitiveness, National University of General Sarmiento, Document N°02/2007.
Yoguel, G., Borello, J. and Erbes, A. (2006). Sistemas Locales de Innovación. Los casos de Córdoba, Rafaela, Rosario y Tucumán, Salta y Jujuy. Sistema Nacional y Sistemas Locales de Innovación Programme. National Observatory of Science, Technology and Innovation, Secretariat for Science and Technology.
Zuniga, P. (2016). Innovation system in development: The case of Peru. Maastricht Economic UNU-MERIT. Working Papers, 58.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Gabriela Starobinsky
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain their copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which is simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows third parties to share the work provided that its author and first publication in this journal are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing arrangements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. depositing it in an institutional telematic archive or publishing it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work via the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The Open Access Effect)
