Tiny Tim on the big screen. The representation of disability in three adaptations of A Chistmas Carol in the post-World War II period

Authors

  • Eleonora Gallitelli Università degli Studi Roma Tre

Keywords:

Charles Dickens, A Christmas Carol, film adaptation, disability, affect studies

Abstract

This paper focuses on the character of Tiny Tim in Charles Dickens’s A Christmas Carol to examine how he was represented in three films made in the postwar period: the British Scrooge (1951), the Spanish Leyenda de Navidad (1947) and the Italian Non è mai troppo tardi (1953). Adopting the double perspective of disability studies (to consider the representation of infirmity) and affect studies (to assess the interaction between the characters, or “in-between-ness”), the analysis aims to throw light on the disability stereotypes which typically emerge in film adaptations of the novel.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brewer, Fe. “Innocence and Ignorance: Concepts of Childhood Reflected in Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol”. CLiC Fiction Blog. (8 Aug. 2022). Web. 19 March 2023.

Christol, Florent. “Screening A Christmas Carol (Dickens, 1843): Adaptation as Completion”. Cahiers victoriens et édouardiens. 82 (2015): 1-30. Web. 19 March 2023.

Cunningham, Valentine. “Dickens and Christianity”. A Companion to Charles Dickens. Ed. David Paroissien. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, 2008. 255-276.

Davis, Paul. “Literary History: Retelling A Christmas Carol: Text and Culture-Text”. The American Scholar, 59, 1 (1990): 109-15.

Dickens, Charles. A Christmas Carol. 1843. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Forster, John. The Life of Charles Dickens. Vol. 1. E-book ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Kindle.

Gregg, Melissa, and Gregory J. Seigworth, editors. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2010.

Guida, Fred. A Christmas Carol and its Adaptations: A Critical Examination of Dickens’s Story and Its Productions on Screen and Television. Jefferson, North Carolina and London: McFarland, 2000.

---. “Scrooge Lives!”. TV Guide. (25 Nov. 2000): 30-6.

Hind-Portley, Mary. “A Christmas Carol: A secular or religious text?” CLiC Fiction Blog. (9 June 2020). Web. 19 March 2023.

Mahlberg, Michaela, Stockwell, Peter, Wiegand, Viola and Lentin, Jamie. CLiC: Corpus Linguistics in Context. Web. 19 March 2023.

Norden, Martin F. “Tiny Tim on Screen: a Disability Studies Perspective.” Dickens on Screen. Ed. John Glavin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 188-198.

Pfeiffer, Lee. “A Christmas Carol”. Encyclopedia Britannica. Web. 19 March 2023.

Spinoza, Benedetto. Etica. Translated by Gaetano Durante, 2001, E-book ed., Firenze: Giunti Editore/Bompiani, 2019. Kindle.

Stothers, William G. “Bah, Humbug: I Hate Tiny Tim.” San Diego Union-Tribune. 23 (Dec. 1993): B9.

Tomalin, Claire. Charles Dickens: A Life. E-book ed., London: Penguin Books, 2011. Kindle.

Wolfson, Kim, and Martin F. Norden. “Film Images of People with Disabilities”. Handbook of Communication and People with Disabilities: Research and Application. Ed. Dawn Braithwaite and Teresa Thompson. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000. 289-305.

Published

2023-12-23

How to Cite

Tiny Tim on the big screen. The representation of disability in three adaptations of A Chistmas Carol in the post-World War II period. (2023). Revista De Culturas Y Literaturas Comparadas, 14. https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/CultyLit/article/view/43908