Anticipatory governance and foresight Considerations on the draft bill proposal to provide and institutional struture on the future for Chile

Main Article Content

Paola Aceituno

Abstract

The lack of appreciation of future thinking in public management has often meant that decisions relevant to society have been subject to unexpected effects, failed public policies or erratic courses of action, among other undesired consequences. Until recently, only Finland had a Future Commission in parliament. This public policy began to be replicated in different countries, which has meant creating spaces for an institutional framework for prospective studies, either under the executive or under parliament. Chile, through the Senate's Future Commission, resumed in 2022 the idea begun in 2012, of providing the country with the capacity to anticipate and collectively manage the future, housed in the institutional structure. This objective was led by the Future Commission of the Chilean Senate, which convened a multidisciplinary working group, where former ministers, regional governors, foresight experts, former presidents and international directors of foresight units participated, with the aim of enriching the discussion. . The table met for approximately 8 months, culminating with a proposed bill that proposes a prospective institutional framework. Although the executive's support for this project is still in progress, this document presents the major milestones of this process and shares reflections and experiences in relation to the most relevant topics, such as the urgent need for political support, the commitment of the members of the table, the international and national experience, the determination of the objectives, purposes and type of institutionality, among others.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Aceituno, P. (2023). Anticipatory governance and foresight: Considerations on the draft bill proposal to provide and institutional struture on the future for Chile. Administración Pública Y Sociedad (APyS), (16), 193–201. Retrieved from https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/43545
Section
Informes Técnicos

References

ACEITUNO, P. (2015). Prospectiva estratégica: historia, desarrollo y experiencias en América del Sur: los casos de Chile, Argentina, Brasil, Perú y Colombia. Ediciones UTEM, Chile.

ACEITUNO, P. (2020). Foresight studies and their assessment in the public policy of two Chilean regional development strategies. Cuadernos de Administración 36 (68), 152-165.

AMER, M., DAIM, T. y JETTER, A. (2013). A review of scenario planning. Futures 46, 23-40.

BERGER, G. (1967). Étapes de la Prospective. Presses Universitaires de France 108, Boulevard Saint-Germain, Paris.

http://www.laprospective.fr/dyn/francais/memoire/texte_fondamentaux/cahier_prospective/cahier-3-les-etapes-de-la-prospective.pdf

BUCHANANS, L. y O´CONNELL, A. (2006). A Brief History of Decision Making, Harvard Business Review.

FUERTH, L. y FABER, E. (2012). Anticipatory Governance and Practical Upgrades, Washington, D.C., National Defense University Press.

GODET, M. (1995). De la Anticipación a la Acción. Ediciones Alfa Omega. México.

ILPES-CEPAL (2022). Apuntes N°2 Prospectiva y Resiliencia. https://comunidades.cepal.org/ilpes/es/grupos/noticia/apuntes-ndeg2-prospectiva-y-resiliencia

IZQUIERDO, A., PESSINO, C. y VULETIN, G. (2018). Better spending for better lives: how Latin America and the Caribbean can do more with less. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Better-Spending-for-Better-Lives-How-Latin-America-and-the-Caribbean-Can-Do-More-with-Less.pdf

KOSKIMAA, V. y RAUNIO, T. (2022). Expanding anticipatory governance to legislatures: The emergence and global diffusion of legislature-based future institutions. International Political Science Review 1-17.

KOSKIMAA, V. y RAUNIO, T. (2023). Curtailing political short-termism in legislatures: a trade-off between influence and institutionalization? Eur J Futures Res 11, 8.

KRAFT, M. y FURLONG, S. (2006): Public Policy: Politics, Analysis and Alternatives, 2nd, CQ Press, Washington, DC.

NASER, A., RAMÍREZ-ALUJAS, A., y ROSALES, D. (2017). Desde el gobierno abierto al Estado abierto en América Latina y el Caribe. Libros de la CEPAL, N° 144, CEPAL, Santiago, Chile.

NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE COUNCIL (2021). Global Trends 2040: a more contested world. https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/GlobalTrends_2040.pdf

MORIN, E. (2011). Introducción al pensamiento complejo. Gedisa Editorial, Barcelona, España.

OCDE (2019). Strategic Foresight for Better Policies. Building Effective Governance in the Face of Uncertain Futures. https://www.oecd.org/strategic-foresight/ourwork/Strategic%20Foresight%20for%20Better%20Policies.pdf

OCDE (2022). Foresight and Anticipatory Governance in Practice. Lessons in effective foresight institutionalization. Strategic Foresight Unit. Office of the Secretary-General. https://www.oecd.org/strategic-foresight/ourwork/Foresight_and_Anticipatory_Governance.pdf

PNUD (2017). Manual de Análisis Prospectivo para el Desarrollo Sostenible. Panamá: Graphic Solutions.

SLAUGHTER, R. A. (1998). Futures Studies as an Intellectual and Applied Discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(3), 372-385.

TÕNURIST, P., y HANSON, A. (2020). OECD. Anticipatory Innovation Governance Shaping the future through proactive policy making. https://www.sdg16hub.org/system/files/2021-01/cce14d80-en.pdf

TULLY, C. (2021). Features of effective systemic foresight in governments around the world. www.soif.org.uk

TV SENADO CHILENO (16 junio, 2022). Conformación de la Mesa de Prospectiva.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95abHNZkGRQ&t=3s

UE (2023). Informe sobre prospectiva estratégica 2023. La sostenibilidad y el bienestar de las personas como núcleo central de la autonomía estratégica abierta de Europa. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52023DC0376