Public policies and their grammatical content. An approach to the model of the grammar of institutions from local public policy

Main Article Content

Abstract

The analysis of public policies constitutes a topic that, traditionally, aroused a marked interest within specialized sectors and that, for this reason, early on, motivated different theoretical and methodological proposals.  Inscribed in this trend, the tools of institutional grammar represent a relatively recent contribution, in which the study focuses, strictly, on the examination of the textual components of the expressions of public policies.  Although, in recent years, this approach has received greater attention within the pertinent field, the different aspects involved in its implementation still admit higher levels of inquiry.  Considering this and contemplating the possibility of applying this technique to the textual analysis of public policies in the Argentine institutional scenario, in this work, a tour of the main aspects of the theoretical and conceptual development of the institutional grammar model is carried out and a series of specific proposals are formulated for its implementation based on the examination of selected instruments of provincial public policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Torres, M. A. (2023). Public policies and their grammatical content.: An approach to the model of the grammar of institutions from local public policy. Administración Pública Y Sociedad (APyS), (15), 2–35. Retrieved from https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/40426
Section
Artículos

References

ANGULO-CÁZARES, Reynaldo. (2018). Problemas de agencia en la educación básica en México: un diagnóstico institucional. Convergencia Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 77, 149-173.

ATLAN, Henri. (1990). Entre el cristal y el humo: ensayo sobre la organización de lo vivo. Madrid: Debate.

BECK, Ulrich. (1998). La sociedad del riesgo hacia una nueva modernidad. Barcelona: Paidós.

BENEDETTI, Álvaro. (2017). El marco de análisis y desarrollo institucional (IAD), una herramienta de análisis de políticas públicas. Estudio del caso Agro Ingreso Seguro (AIS). Estudios Políticos, 50, 138-158.

BLACK, Max. (20|16). Modelos y metáforas, Madrid: Tecnos.

BUSHOUSE, Brenda; SCHWEIK, Charles; SIDDIKI, Saba; RICE, Doug y WOLFSON, Isaac. (2021). The Institutional Grammar: A Method for Coding Institutions and its Potential for Advancing Third Sector Research. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, primera publicación de modo online, 1-8.

CRAWFORD, Sue y OSTROM, Elinor. (2015). Una gramática de las instituciones. En Elinor Ostrom (Ed.) Comprender la diversidad institucional. México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económico, 195-239.

DUNLOP, Claire, KAMKHAJI, Jonathan y RADAELLI, Claudio. (2019). A sleeping giant awakes? The rise of the Institutional Grammar Tool (IGT) in policy research. Journal of chinese governance, 4 (2), 163-180.

EASTON, David. (2013). Esquema para el análisis político [3ra ed.]. Madrid: Amorrortu.

FRANTZ, Christopher y Siddiki, Saba. (2022). Institutional Grammar. Foundations and Applications for Institutional Analysis. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.

KISER, Larry y OSTROM, Elinor. (1982). The Three Worlds of Action: A Metatheoretical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches. En Elinor Ostrom E. [Ed.] Strategies of Political Inquiry. USA: Sage, 179-222.

OSTROM, Elinor. (2007). Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. En Paul Sabatier [Ed.] Theories of the Policy Process. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press, 21- 64.

OSTROM, Elinor. (2015). Comprender la diversidad institucional, México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económico. [Primera edición en inglés: Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press].

OSTROM, Elinor. y BASURTO, Xavier. (2010). Crafting Analytical Tools to Study Institutional Change. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(3), 317–343.

OSTROM, Elinor y CRAWFORD, Sue. (1995). A Grammar of Institutions. The American Political Science Review, 89 (3), 582-600.

OSTROM, Elinor. (2009). Las reglas que no se hacen cumplir son pura palabrería. Revista de Economía Internacional, II (21), 15-24.

PRINCE, Alejandro; JOLIAS, Lucas y FINQUELIEVICH, Susana. (2013). Un modelo analítico de ciudad del conocimiento para América Latina. En Tamara Tania Cohen Egler, (Org.) Digitalização do Território. Rio de Janeiro: Letra Capital, 179-207.

RICE, Doug; SIDDIKI, Saba; FREY, Seth.; KWON, Jay y SAWYER, Adam. (2021). Machine coding of policy texts with the Institutional Grammar. Public Administration, 99 (2), 248–262.

SÁNCHEZ OROZCO, Víctor y VERDUZCO CHÁVEZ, Basilio. (2015). Preferencias institucionales y organización de los cuerpos de seguridad. En: Basilio. Verduzco Chávez (Coord.) Cada quien su imperio: preferencias institucionales y patrones territoriales de inseguridad. Guadalajara: Edición Universitaria, 79 – 104.

SÁNCHEZ-CUENCA, Ignacio. (2004) Teoría de juegos. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

SIDDIKI, Saba y LUPTON, Suzann. (2016) Assessing Nonprofit Rule Interpretation and Compliance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45 (4), 156S-174S.

SUBIRATS, Joan; KNOEPFEL, Peter; LARRUE, Corinne y VARONE, Frédéric. (2008). Análisis y gestión de políticas públicas. Barcelona: Ariel.

VALLÉS, Josep Maria. (2007). Ciencia Política. Una Introducción, Barcelona: Ariel.