Business regulation administrative costs as independent and dependent variable: a state of affairs

Main Article Content

Pablo Daniel Garibaldi

Abstract

The present study carries out an evaluation of the literature on the role that administrative costs of business regulation fulfill both as an independent and dependent variable and its limitations. This review aims to contribute to the understanding ofbusiness regulation and provide explanations, on the one hand, of differences found in different countries in terms of economic performance to the extent that administrative costs of the regulations fulfill a role as an independent variable. In this sense, the main economic results observed are the entry of new legally constituted firms, production per capita, goods’ and services export and economic growth. On the other hand, this work seeks to reconstruct the political and economic determinants that allowto account for the level of administrative costs of business regulation. This last academic production, notoriously more limited and less systematized than that devoted to economic effects, addresses both structural factors and public policies implementedby a given administration to reduce the administrative burden in question. From this review, we suggest possible investigations that contribute to administrative costs’ analysis of business regulation in recent times.To that end, a sample of works published in the decades of 2000 and 2010 has beenanalyzed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Garibaldi, P. D. (2019). Business regulation administrative costs as independent and dependent variable: a state of affairs. Administración Pública Y Sociedad (APyS), (7), 44–61. Retrieved from https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/24161
Section
Artículos
Author Biography

Pablo Daniel Garibaldi, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto Nacional de la Administración Pública

Licenciado en Ciencia Política (UBA). Magíster en Economía Política (FLACSO). Investigador del Instituto Nacional de la Administración Pública (INAP).

References

Amici, M., Giacomelli, S., Manaresi, F. y Tonello, M. (2016). Red tape reduction and firm entry: evidence from an Italian reform. Disponible en https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/qef/2015-0285/QEF_285.pdf

Arendsen, R; Peters, O.; Hedde, M. y Dijk, J. (2014). Does e-government reduce the administrative burden of businesses? An assessment of business-to-government systems usage in the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 160-169.

Banco Mundial (2019). Doing Business 2019. Training for reform. Disponible en http://espanol.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/media/Annual-Reports/English/DB2019-report_web-version.pdf

Bozeman, B. (1993). A Theory of Government Red Tape. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(July), 273-303.

Bruhn, M. (2008). License to Sell: The Effect of Business Registration Reform on Entrepreneurial Activity in Mexico. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4538. Disponible en https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/6596/wps4538.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Bruhn, M. (2011). License to Sell: The Effect of Business Registration Reform on Entrepreneurial Activity in Mexico. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1): 382–386.

Branstetter, L., Lima, F., Taylor, L y Venancio, A. (2014). Do Entry Regulations Deter Entrepreneurship and Job Creation? Evidence from Recent Reforms in Portugal. Economic Journal, 124(577), 805-832.

Cavalcanti, T.;Magalhaes, A. y Tavares, J. (2008). Institutions and economic development in Brazil. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48 (2008), 412–432.

Ciccone, A. y Papaioannou, E. (2007). Red Tape and delayed entry. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(2-3), 444-458.

Ciriaci, D. (2014). Business dynamics and Red Tape Barriers. European Commissions, Economic Papers 532. Disponible en http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/economic_paper/2014/pdf/ecp532_en.pdf

Coolidge, J. (2012). Findings of tax compliance cost surveys in developing countries. eJournal of Tax Research, 10(2), 250-287

Chari, A. (2007). License Reform in India: Theory and Evidence. Disponible en https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3c39/890c5cec06cc39f5a8f5c98271116ba62ae9.pdf

De Jong, G. y Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2014). Regulatory red tape and private firm performance. Public Administration, 93(1), 34-51.

Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. y Shleifer, A. (2002). The Regulation of Entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37.

Djankov, S. McLiesh, C. y Ramalho, R. (2006). Regulation and Growth. Economics Letters, 92(3), 395-401.

Djankov, S.; Freund, C., y Pham, C. (2010). Trading on Time. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(1), 166-173.

Djankov, S. (2009). The Regulation of Entry: A Survey. The World Bank Research Observer, 24(2), 183-203.

Dreher, A. y Gassebner, M. (2013). Greasing the wheels? The impact of regulations and corruption on firm entry. Public Choice, 155(3–4), 413–432.

Eichfelder, S. y Schorn, M. (2012). Tax Compliance Costs: A Business-Administration Perspective. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, 68(2) (June 2012), 191-230.

Evans, C. (2008). Taxation compliance and administrative costs: an overview. En Lang, M. et al. (Ed.), Tax compliance costs for companies in an enlarged European Community.

González-Torres Fernández, G. (2014). Aggregate Effects of Bureaucratic Startup Costs. Disponible en https://www.bde.es/f/webpi/SES/seminars/2015/files/sie1509.pdf

Haidar, J. (2012). The impact of business regulatory reforms on economic growth. Journal of The Japanese and International Economies, 26, 285-307.

Kaufmann, W., Hooghiemstra, R y Feeney, M. (2018). Formal institutions, informal institutions, and red tape: A comparative study. Public Administration, 96, 386–403.

Klapper, L., Laeven, L. y Rajan R. (2006). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(3), 591-629.

Landman, T. (2000). Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An introduction. Londres: Routledge.

Lapuente, V. y Provost, C. (2010). Political Institutions and Administrative Red Tape. Disponible en http://regulation.upf.edu/dublin-10-papers/5D3.pdf

Malyshev, N. (2006). Regulatory Policy: OECD Experience and Evidence. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 274-299.

Monteiro, J. y Assunção, J. (2012). Coming out of the shadows? Estimating the impact of bureaucracy simplification and tax cut on formality in Brazilian microenterprises. Journal of Development Economics, 99, 105-115.

Morisset, J. y Lumenga Neso, O. (2002). Administrative Barriers to Foreign Investment in Developing Countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2848. Disponible en http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/556581468766823917/pdf/multi0page.pdf

Ntaliani, M. y Costopoulou, C. (2014). E-Government for Lowering Administrative Burden: An Empirical Research on European Rural Businesses. Journal International Journal of Public Administration, 41(9), 700-711.

Penfold, M. y Aguilera, A. (2011). El uso de las TIC para la simplificación de barreras administrativas a la inversión. Casos exitosos en América Latina. Serie Políticas Públicas y Transformación Productiva N° 1 / 2011. Disponible en http://publicaciones.caf.com/media/11206/tic_2011_01.pdf

Renda, A., Schrefler, L., Luchetta, G. and Zavatta, R. (2013) Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Regulation. Brüssel: Centre for European Policy Studies. Disponible en http://ec. Europa.eu/Smart regulation/impact/commission_guidelines/docs/131210_cba_study_sg_final

Sandford, C., Godwin, M. y Hardwick P. (1989). Administrative and Compliance Costs of Taxation. Bath, UK: Fiscal Publications.

Schneider, B. (2015). Designing Industrial Policy in Latin America: Business-State Relations and the New Developmentalism. Nueva York: Palgrave - Macmillan.

Tran Nam, C. (2015). Tax Compliance as a Red Tape to Businesses: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Evidence from Australia. Journal of Business & Economic Policy, 2(4), 76-87.

Voermans, W. J. M. (2008). The Sisyphus Paradox of Cutting Red Tape and Managing Public Risk. Utrecht Law Review, 4(3), 128–144.

Wegrich, K. (2009). The Administrative Burden Reduction Policy Boom in Europe. Comparing mechanisms of policy diffusion. Disponible en http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/36536/1/Disspaper52.pdf