Inclusive and socially fair transportation. The case of metropolitan areas in Argentina

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))
Published: Dec 8, 2018
Keywords:
mobility, inclusive. social justice, accessibility, public policies

Main Article Content

Alicia Riera
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigación y Formación en Administración Pública.

Abstract

This article explores mobility from a social justice and inclusion perspective, by considering the case of four cities in Argentina which count on data from household travel surveys undertaken between 2009 and 2013. Population mobility indicators which describe distributional aspects involving inequalities and social exclusion were obtained for groups of households classified by income level as well as other socio demographic variables such as gender and age. With regard to the referential framework, mobility policy approaches and different interpretations of mobility from a social perspective are addressed, together with a discussion regarding inmobility in emerging country metropolitan areas. The paper ends pointing out the need to perform studies focusing on mobility issues of particular population segments in order to identify non - inclusive situations and their causes. This would be useful to inform and prioritize policies that seek to match opportunities for everyone.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Riera, A. (2018). Inclusive and socially fair transportation. The case of metropolitan areas in Argentina. Administración Pública Y Sociedad (APyS), (6), 63–76. Retrieved from https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/21908
Issue
No. 6 (2018): Julio- Diciembre 2018
Section
Dossier Temático

Authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms of the copyright policy:

  1. Authors shall retain their copyright (including copyrights) and shall grant to the journal the right of first publication of their work, which shall simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License: No commercial use of the original work or any derivative works is permitted, distribution of which must be made under a license equal to that which governs the original work. 
  2. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated. 
  3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the publication process, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increased citations of the published work.  (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

Ben-Akiva, M., Weisbrod, G. and Lerma, S. (1980). Tradeoffs in residential location decisions: Transportation versus other factors. Transportation Policy and Decision Making. Cambridge Systematics, Inc and Department of Civil Engineering. Massachussets Institute of Technology, 1980.

Baindur, D., & Rao, P. (2016). What can we say about equity in urban transport? doi:10.24943/1-0023

Falavigna, C., Hernandez, D., & Guimaraes Rodrigues, T. (2017a). Mobilidade inclusiva. In Transporte, Mobilidade e Desenvolvimiento Urbano (1st ed., p. 219 268). Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

Falavigna, C., Guimaraes Rodrigues, T., & Hernández, D. (2017b). M. In Mobilidade justa socialmente (1st ed., p. 243 268). Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

Foster, J., J. Greer and E. Thorbecke (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 761–766.

Gutierrez, Andrea. (2010). Movilidad, transporte y acceso: una renovación aplicada al ordenamiento territorial. Revista Scripta Nova Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad de Barcelona. ISSN: 1138-9788. Depósito Legal: B. 21.741-98 Vol. XIV, núm. 331 (86), http://www.ub.edu/geocrit/sn/sn-331/sn-331-86.htm

Hernández, Mouttone (2016) Encuesta de Movilidad del Area Metropolitana de Montevideo. Principales resultados e indicadores. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1078/EncuestadeMovilidadMVD-documentocompleto-final.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Household Travel Survey (HTS) (2012/2013). Sydney, Australia. https://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/media/documents/2017/HTS%20Report%20Sydney%202012-13.pdf

Srour, I., Kockelman, K., & Dunn, T. (2002). Accessibility Indices: Connection to Residential Land Prices and Location Choices. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1805, 25-34. doi:10.3141/1805-04

Litman, T. (2016). Evaluating accessibility for transportation planning. Measuring people’s ability to reach desired goods and activities. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.

Litman, Todd, author. (2015). Analysis of public policies that unintentionally encourage and subsidize urban sprawl.

Litman, Todd. (2012). Evaluating transportation equity: Guidance for incorporating distributional impacts in transportation planning. Victoria: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.

Litman, T. (2003). Economic Value of Walkability. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1828, 3-11. doi:10.3141/1828-01

London Travel Demand Survey. (LTDS), (2009/2010) https://www.clocs.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/london-travel-demand-survey-2011.pdf

Lucas, K. (2004). Transport and social exclusion. Running on empty, 39-54. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1t89876.11

Lucas, K., & Jones, P. (2012). Social impacts and equity issues in transport: an introduction. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 1-3. doi:10.1016/j. jtrangeo.2012.01.032

Martens, K. (2017). Transport justice: Designing fair transportation systems.

Nazari Adli, S., & Donovan, S. (2018). Right to the city: Applying justice tests to public transport investments. Transport Policy, 66, 56-65. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.03.005

Pereira, R. H., Schwanen, T., & Banister, D. (2016). Distributive justice and equity in transportation. Transport Reviews, 37(2), 170-191. doi:10.1080/01441647. 2016. 1257660

Portugal, L., & Mello, A. J. (2017). Um panorama inicial sobre transporte mobilidade, accesibilidade e desenvolvimento urbano. In Transporte, mobilidade e desenvolvimento urbano (1st ed., pp. 1-18). Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

PTUBA, ENMODO (2010) Encuesta de movilidad domiciliaria. Movilidad en el área metropolitana de Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires; Secretaría de Transporte – Proyecto de Transporte Urbano de Buenos Aires.

PTUMA (2011) Encuesta de origen/destino 2009. Movilidad en el área metropolitana de Córdoba. Proyecto Transporte Urbano Areas Metropolitanas, Secretaría de Transporte, Ministerio de Planificación Federal, Inversión Pública y Servicios de la Nación Argentina.

PTUMA (2012) Encuesta de origen/destino 2010. Movilidad en el área metropolitana de Mendoza. Proyecto Transporte Urbano Areas Metropolitanas, Secretaría de Transporte, Ministerio de Planificación Federal, Inversión Pública y Servicios de la Nación Argentina.

PTUMA (2013) Encuesta de origen/destino 2012. Movilidad en el área metropolitana de Salta. Proyecto Transporte Urbano Areas Metropolitanas, Secretaría de Transporte, Ministerio de Planificación Federal, Inversión Pública y Servicios de la Nación Argentina.

Rawls, J. (2005). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Van Wee, B. (2009). Self‐Selection: A Key to a Better Understanding of Location Choices, Travel Behaviour and Transport Externalities? Transport Reviews, 29(3), 279-292. doi:10.1080/01441640902752961

Vasconcellos, E. A. (2015). Transporte urbano y movilidad: reflexiones y propuestas para países en desarrollo (1st ed.). Buenos Aires: San Martin UNSAMedita.

Walzer, M., & Rubio, H. (2001). Las esferas de la justicia: Una defensa del pluralismo y la igualdad. México: FCE