Sustainable urban mobility: some basic principles and solutions

Main Article Content

Juan de Dios Ortúzar Salas

Abstract

This paper is about how to achieve a harmonious development in our cities and not end up transforming into a suffering for its inhabitants. For this, we begin by defining sustainability concept and what elements should be associated with sustainable urban development. Then, we concentrate in the vehicular congestion concept which one of the biggest challenges in the field of urban mobility. We characterize congestion in order to understand what the possible solutions are. Some basic tools of traffic engineering and two paradoxes (Braess and Downs-ThomsonMogridge paradoxes) were posed to demonstrate that common sense solutions do not work; particularly those policies focused exclusively into increasing road infrastructure will not resolve this problem and reinforced the idea that, in congested scenarios, the worst enemy of urban sustainability is the indiscriminate use of the private car. Then, we suggest that urban development and mobility should be treated as twisted problems in organized complexity, so they do not have satisfactory solutions. Finally, we propose a stick and carrot approach, which is the most consensual solution among specialists: the first is a policy - such as road pricing - that charges for car use in congested periods and places of the city. The carrot policy, refers to the provision of an adequate and dignified public transport system. Finally, we argue that this does not seem to be possible without the presence of a positive political leader who is willing to play longer-term strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ortúzar Salas, J. de D. (2018). Sustainable urban mobility: some basic principles and solutions. Administración Pública Y Sociedad (APyS), (6), 48–62. Retrieved from https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/21815
Section
Dossier Temático

References

Ampt, E.S. y Ortúzar, J. de D. (2004) On best practice in continuous large-scale mobility surveys. Transport Reviews 24, 337-363.

Basso, L.J., Silva, H.E. y Riquelme, I. (2017) Urban road congestion management: capacity investments and pricing policies. 13th International Conference of The Western Economic Association International, 3-6 Junio, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago.

Burford, G., Hoover, E., Velasco, I., Janoušková, S., Jimenez, A., Piggot, G., Podger, D. y Harder, M.K. (2013) Bringing the “missing pillar” into sustainable development goals: towards intersubjective values-based indicators sustainability. Sustainability 5, 3035-3059.

Braess, D., Nagurney, A. y Wakolbinger, T. (2005) On a paradox of traffic planning. Transportation Science 39, 446–450.

Campoli, J. (2012) Made for Walking: Density and Neighbourhood Form. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Washington, D.C.

Cantillo, V. y Ortúzar, J. de D. (2014) Restricting the use of cars by license plate numbers: a misguided urban transport policy. Dyna 81, 75-82.

CEDEUS (2017) Centro de Desarrollo Urbano Sustentable (www.cedeus.cl), Santiago.

CEDEUS-MINVU (2018) Sustentabilidad a Escala de Barrio. Re-visitando el programa “Quiero mi Barrio”. Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo, Santiago.

Cervero, R. y Kockelman, K. (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2, 199-219.

De Lisio, A. (1999) Desarrollo sustentable: opciones y limitaciones para América Latina y el Caribe. Revista Cuadernos del Cendes 16, 1-23.

Downs, A. (1962) The law of peak-hour expressway congestion. Traffic Quarterly 16, 393–409.

Harding. T. (2014) Common Sense Fallacy.(https://yandoo.wordpress.com/2014/12/28/common-sense-fallacy/).

Hensher, D.A. y Bliemer, M. (2014) What type of road pricing scheme might appeal to politicians? Viewpoints on the challenge in gaining the citizen and public servant vote by staging reform. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 61, 227-237.

Informe Brundtlandt (1987) Nuestro Futuro Común. Comisión Mundial para el Medio Ambiente y el Desarrollo, ONU, Washington, D.C.

International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (1980) World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development. ONU, Gland, Suiza.

Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House, Nueva York.

Kimber, R.M, McDonald, M. y Hounsell, N. (1985) Passenger car units in saturation flows: concept, definition, derivation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 19, 39-61.

Littig, B. y Griessler, E. (2005) Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development 8, 65-79.

Miller, E. (2018) Viewpoint: integrated urban modelling- past, present and future. The Journal of Transport and Land Use 11, 387-399.

Mogridge, M.J.H. (1990) Planning for optimum urban efficiency: the relationship between congestion on the roads and public transport. Transportation Planning Systems 11–19.

Mogridge, M.J.H., Holden, D.J., Bird, J. y Terzis, G.C. (1987) The Downs-Thomson paradox and the transportation planning process. International Journal of Transport Economics 14, 283-311.

Ortúzar, J. de D., Bascuñán, R., Salata, A. y Rizzi, L.I (2018) Assessing the potential acceptability of road pricing in Santiago. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice (en revision).

Ortúzar, J. de D. y Willumsen, L.G. (2011) Modelling Transport. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

Rittel, H.W.J y Webber, M.M. (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4, 155-169.

Rizzi, L.I. y de la Maza, C. (2017) The external costs of private versus public road transport in the Metropolitan Area of Santiago, Chile. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 98, 123-140.

Schrank, D., Eisele, B., Lomax, T. y Bak, J. (2015) 2015 Urban Mobility Scorecard. The Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.

Smart Growth America (2015) Safer Streets, Stronger Economies: Complete Street Project Outcomes from Across the Country. Smart Growth America, Washington, D.C.

Spangenberg, J.H., Omann, I. y Hinterberger, F. (2002) Sustainable growth criteria. minimum benchmarks and scenarios for employment and the environment. Ecological Economics 42, 429- 443.

Thomson, J.M. (1977) Great Cities and Their Traffic. Gollancz, Peregrine Edition, Londres.

Wilson, P. (2015) Urban Sustainability Theory and Practice. Routledge, Londres.