Some lessons from mexico’s program for innovation promotion

Article Sidebar

Revista APyS
PDF (Español (España))
Published: Dec 27, 2017
Keywords:
public policy, science, technology & innovation policy, multifactorial analysis, evaluation

Main Article Content

Daniel Villavicencio
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Antonio Chiapa Zenón
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Abstract

One of the challenges of the Economics of Innovation is the construction of models that seek to describe and explain companies’ behavior during R+D activity development, and these models’ application for S&T and Innovation policy design. This paper analyses a sample of innovative companies in Mexico, which were granted by the Technological Innovation Program of the Ministry of Economy and CONACYT. Our aim was to build up a classification in order to explain innovation capabilities of the granted firms, and to assess the performance of their R+D projects. For this purpose, we used two statistical techniques: conglomerates and correspondences. The taxonomy we obtained describes stylized facts and STI capabilities of the companies and their projects’ impacts. We conclude that the problem of convergence or divergence may be linked to market structural factors or to the role played by some institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Villavicencio, D., & Chiapa Zenón, A. (2017). Some lessons from mexico’s program for innovation promotion. Administración Pública Y Sociedad (APyS), (4), 88–103. Retrieved from https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/18899
Issue
No. 4 (2017): Julio- Diciembre 2017
Section
Dossier Temático

Authors who publish in this journal accept the following terms of the copyright policy:

  1. Authors shall retain their copyright (including copyrights) and shall grant to the journal the right of first publication of their work, which shall simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License: No commercial use of the original work or any derivative works is permitted, distribution of which must be made under a license equal to that which governs the original work. 
  2. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (e.g., placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated. 
  3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the publication process, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increased citations of the published work.  (See The Effect of Open Access).
Author Biography

Daniel Villavicencio, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.

Profesor e Investigador. Posgrado en Economia y Gestión de la Innovación. División de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades (DCSH) de la UAM Xochimilco.

DCSH, UAM Xochimilco
Tel: (52-55) 5594-3628 & 5483-7279 Fax: (52-55) 5594-9100
Calz. del Hueso 1100, col. Villa Quietud, 04960 México, D.F.

References

Archibugi, D., 2001. Pavitt taxonomy: sixteen years on: a review article, Economy Innovation new technology, Vol. 10: 415-425.

Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. and Soete, L., 1988. Technical Change and Economic Theory, London, New York: Pinter Publishers.

Foro Consultivo Científico y Tecnológico. (2006).“Informe de actividades junio 2004-2006”, FCCyT, México

Greenacre, M., 2007. Correspondence analysis in practice, 2nda. Edición, Chapman and Hall: 274.

Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., y Black W., 2005. Análisis Multivariante, 5a edición, Pearson Prentice Hall: 799.

Hardle, W. y Leopold S., 2007. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Ed. Springer: 486.

Miyamoto, S., 1990. Fuzzy Sets in information Retrieval in Cluster Analysis, Springer-science: 259.

Nelson, R. y Winter, S., 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: 454.

Pavitt, K., 1984. Patrones sectoriales de cambio técnico: Hacia una taxonomía y una teoría, Research Policy, Volumen 13, Número 6: 343-373.

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2008. Handbook on constructing composite indicators, Methodology and user guide.

Roberts, S., Husmeier, D., Rezek, I., y W. Penny, (1998). Bayesian approaches to gaussian mixture modelling. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(11): 1133-1142.

Valenti, G., Casalet, M., Avaro, D., 2008. Instituciones sociedad del conocimiento y mundo de trabajo, FLACSO México, Plaza y Valdés Editores: 473.

Watanabe, M., Yamaguchi, K. 2004. EM algorithm in neural network learning. En N. Murata, S. Ikeda (Eds.) The EM algorithm and related statistical models. New York: Marcel Dekker: 95-125.

VILLAVICENCIO D., (2009), “Recent changes in science and technology policy in Mexico: innovation incentives” en Martínez J.M. (Ed.) Generation and Protection of Knowledge: intellectual property, innovation and economic development, ECLAC, United, Nations, Santiago, pp. 263-290

VILLAVICENCIO D., (2011), “Retos para el diseño de políticas en México en el marco de la innovación abierta”, en Bracamontes A. y O. Contreras (eds), Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación para el Desarrollo Económico, COLSON-COECYT, México, pp. 73-102

VILLAVICENCIO D., (2012), “Incentivos a la innovación en México: entre políticas y dinámicas sectoriales” en Carrillo, Hualde y Villavciencio., (Eds.), Dilemas de la innovación en México, COLEF-Red CCS, México, pp. 27-72