Unidad de Ciencias del Comportamiento y Políticas Públicas del Gobierno de la Nación Argentina: Reseña de una experiencia (2021-2023)

Main Article Content

Iván Budassi
Jorgelina Bertoni
Paula Caccia
Ángel Elgier
Mariano Dottori
Ricardo Rotsztein
Agustina Aragón Daud
Fernando Torrente

Abstract

The influence of scientific developments on behavior has steadily grown in the field of public administration and governments in recent decades. Following the pioneering experience of the Behavioral Insights Team in the United Kingdom, various organizations with similar characteristics have been created in numerous countries around the world. These “nudge units” focus on implementing rapid and cost-effective interventions, taking into consideration the available empirical evidence on how people effectively decide and act. This article narrates the birth of the Unit of Behavioral Sciences and Public Policies in Argentina in 2021 and how its emergence and development relate to other experiences worldwide. The main activities carried out by the Unit are detailed, and a discussion analyzes the achievements and limitations of the experience, the barriers encountered, and recommendations to be considered in future similar developments.

Article Details

How to Cite
Unidad de Ciencias del Comportamiento y Políticas Públicas del Gobierno de la Nación Argentina: Reseña de una experiencia (2021-2023). (2024). Argentinean Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 16(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v16.n1.44605
Section
Reseñas bibliográficas

How to Cite

Unidad de Ciencias del Comportamiento y Políticas Públicas del Gobierno de la Nación Argentina: Reseña de una experiencia (2021-2023). (2024). Argentinean Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 16(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v16.n1.44605

References

Afif, Z., Islan, W. W., Calvo-Gonzalez, O., & Dalton, A. (2018). Behavioral science around the world: Profiles of 10 countries. World Bank.

Casa Blanca (2015). Executive Order—Using Behavioral Science Insights to Better Serve the American People. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/09/15/executive-order-using-behavioral-science-insights-better-serve-american

Castro, L., & Scartascini, C. (2015). Tax compliance and enforcement in the pampas evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.04.002

Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2013). Implementation Intentions. En M. D. Gellman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine (pp. 1043–1048). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_1710

Grüne-Yanoff, T., & Hertwig, R. (2016). Nudge versus boost: How coherent are policy and theory? Minds and Machines, 26(1), 149–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-015-9367-9

Hallsworth, M. (2023). A manifesto for applying behavioural science. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(3), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01555-3

Halpern, D. (2015). Inside the nudge unit: How small changes can make a big difference. Random House.

Hertwig, R. (2017). When to consider boosting: Some rules for policy-makers. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.14

Hertwig, R., & Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2017). Nudging and boosting: Steering or empowering good decisions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 973–986. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617702496

Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.

Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6(42), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42

Milkman, K. L., Beshears, J., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. C. (2011). Using implementation intentions prompts to enhance influenza vaccination rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(26), 10415-10420. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103170108

Milkman, K. L., Patel, M. S., Gandhi, L., Graci, H. N., Gromet, D. M., Ho, H., Kay, J. S., Lee, T. W., Akinola, M., Beshears, J., Bogard, J. E., Buttenheim, A., Chabris, C. F., Chapman, G. B., Choi, J. J., Dai, H., Fox, C. R., Goren, A., Hilchey, M. D., … Duckworth, A. L. (2021). A megastudy of text-based nudges encouraging patients to get vaccinated at an upcoming doctor’s appointment. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(20), e2101165118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101165118

Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. Macmillan.

Münscher, R., Vetter, M., & Scheuerle, T. (2016). A Review and Taxonomy of Choice Architecture Techniques. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(5), 511-524. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1897

Naciones Unidas (2021). Nota orientativa del Secretario General sobre las ciencias del comportamiento. https://www.un.org/es/content/behaviouralscience/

Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (2023). BI Units Archive. https://oecd-opsi.org/bi-units/

Sher, S., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (2011). Levels of information: A framing hierarchy. En G. Keren (Ed.), Perspectives on framing (pp. 35–63). Psychology Press.

Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin.

Torrente, F., Bustin, J., Triskier, F., Ajzenman, N., Tomio, A., Mastai, R., & Lopez Boo, F. (2020). Effect of a Social Norm Email Feedback Program on the Unnecessary Prescription of Nimodipine in Ambulatory Care of Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Network Open, 3(12), e2027082. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27082

Organización Mundial de la Salud (2023). 76a Asamblea Mundial de la Salud – Actualización diaria: 29 de mayo de 2023. https://www.who.int/es/news/item/29-05-2023-seventy-sixth-world-health-assembly---daily-update--29-may-2023.

Resolución Conjunta 4/2023 (2023). Secretaría de Asuntos Estratégicos: Resolución Conjunta 4/2023. Boletín Oficial. https://www.boletinoficial.gob.ar/detalleAviso/primera/286632/20230517