Evaluating the sectoral and associative policy: the case of the FSAT program in Argentina
Keywords:
Sectoral policy, Impact assessment, High-tech innovation, Public-Private Partnerships, ArgentinaAbstract
In this paper we propose to evaluate the impact attributable to the Sectoral Funds for High Technology (FSAT) program of the National Agency for the Promotion of Science and Technology (ANPCyT) of Argentina. In particular, we want to determine whether the performance of the private companies that integrated the beneficiary public-private associative consortia improved thanks to the program, in relation to the performance they would have shown if they had received support in individual innovation projects. For this purpose, we will implement a quantitative approach based on the application of impactevaluation techniques. The results show that there are positive impacts on the trajectory of the companies that accessed the FSAT program. On the one hand, the evidence showed that the growth in spending per employee on innovation activities was higher thanks to FSAT. On the other hand, the growth in employment and total sales was more intense thanks to the program.
Downloads
References
Abadie, Alberto, & Matias D. Cattaneo. (2018). Econometric Methods for Program Evaluation. Annual Review of Economics, 10(1), 465–503. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053402
Abadie, A., Athey, S., Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2020). Sampling‐Based versus Design‐Based Uncertainty in Regression Analysis. Econometrica, 88(1), 265-296. http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01778
Ballesteros, J. A., & Rico, A. M. (2001). Public financing of cooperative R&D projects in Spain: the Concerted Projects under the National R&D Plan. Research Policy, 30(4), 625-641.
Baptista, B. (2016). “Políticas de innovación en Uruguay: pasado, presente y evidencias para pensar el futuro”. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de la República (Uruguay).
Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological forecasting and social change, 80(8), 1513-1522.
Chamberlain, G. (1984). Panel Data. In Handbook of Econometrics, edited by Z. Griliches and M. D. Intriligator, 2, pp.1247–1318. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Chaminade, C., & Edquist, C. (2010). Rationales for public policy intervention in the innovation process: Systems of innovation approach. In The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy: An International Research Handbook.
Di Bello, & Versino, M. (2009). El complejo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación en Argentina: instituciones, políticas e instrumentos de financiamiento. Observatorio Sindical de Políticas Universitarias IEC-CONADU.
Ellickson, R. C. (1991). Order without law: How neighbors settle disputes. Harvard University Press.
Fiorentin, F. A., Pereira, M., & Suarez, D. V. (2019). As times goes by. A dynamic impact assessment of the innovation policy and the Matthew effect on Argentinean firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 28(7), 657-673.
Fiorentin, Florencia, Mariano Pereira, and Diana Suárez. (2019). Teoría y práctica de la política de innovación y el desarrollo de capacidades. Hechos estilizados del FONTAR. In Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo, editado por Gustavo Lugones y Fabián Britto. Bernal: UNQ.
Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. M. (2016). Impact evaluation in practice. World Bank Publications.
Kalkstein, L. (2007). Development of Absorptive Capacity in R&D Collaboration: The Case of Danish Innovation Consortium Programme. Department of Innovation and Organizational Economics Copenhagen Business School.
Khandker, S. R., Koolwal, G. B., & Samad, H. A. (2009). Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. World Bank Publications.
Loray, R. (2018). Organismos Internacionales y Políticas de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. El rol del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo en el diseño e implementación de los Fondos de Innovación Tecnológica Sectorial de Argentina (2009-2015). Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Loray, R. P. (2016). La política científica, tecnológica e innovación de Argentina: una lectura a partir de la implementación del Fondo Argentino Sectorial en 2009.
Robert, Verónica, & M Obaya. (2017). Evaluación Del Componente Fondos Sectoriales En Alta Tecnología Del Programa Para Promover La Innovación Productiva y Social.
Sako, M. (1991). Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Cooperation in Italy/The Re-emergence of Small Enterprises (Book Review). British Journal of Industrial Relations, 29(3), 515-517.
Song, M., Dyer, B., & Thieme, R. J. (2006). Conflict management and innovation performance: An integrated contingency perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing science, 34(3), 341-356.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
