AgTech ecosystem: analysis of the technological offer in the central region of Buenos Aires province
Keywords:
Technology Offer, AgTech Ecosystem, Industry 4.0, Entrepreneurial EcosystemAbstract
Industry 4.0 technologies have generated an expansion of new capabilities, allowing the emergence of new entrepreneurs and firms that develop innovations aimed at improving the sustainability of traditional sectors. AgTech is usually defined in a narrow sense as the emerging industry that combines agriculture and technology, while in a broader sense, it also encompasses food processing, delivery and enjoyment activities ("FoodTech"). This paper aims at exploring the supply of Industry 4.0 technology oriented to the agri-food chain in the central region of the Province of Buenos Aires. For this purpose, an exploratory-descriptive study was carried out by means of a questionnaire addressed to actors that develop innovations oriented to this chain. Four categories of actors were identified as of suppliers: R&D developers, product developers, and service providers with B2B commercial relations, and manufacturers of products oriented to the final consumer (B2C). It is important to highlight the presence of links between these actors with universities and R&D centers, and with other companies and intermediate chambers and institutions. This shows the notion of an ecosystem. Differences are recognized in the characterization of the actors with respect to studies of the AgroTech supply developed at a national level and in other central regions of the country. It is proposed as a future line of research the analysis of the technological capabilities of the ecosystem, incorporating the potential supply of technology that can be developed by the R&D Centers of the region.
Downloads
References
Abell Foundation. (2013). Learning from Boston: Implications for Baltimore from Comparing the Entrepreneurial Ecosystems of Baltimore and Boston. Recuperado de: https://abell.org/sites/default/files/publications/CD-BaltoBostonEntreEcosys813.pdf
Audretsch, D. (2006). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Acs, Z. J., y Audretsch, D. B. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and technological change (Vol. 2105). Now Publishers Inc.
Bambini, M. D., y Machado-Bonacelli, M. B. (2019). Ecossistemas Agtech no Brasil: localização, caracterização e atores envolvidos. In Embrapa Informática Agropecuária-Artigo em anais de congresso (ALICE). In: WORKSHOP ANPROTEC; INNOVATION SUMMIT BRASIL, 2019. Florianópolis. O futuro dos ambientes de inovação: anais chamada de trabalhos 2019. Brasília, DF: Anprotec, 2019.
Barleta, E., Perez, G., y Sanchez, R. (2019). La revolución industrial 4.0 y el advenimiento de una logística 4.0. Boletin FAL 375, número 7, Santiago de Chile, Naciones Unidas, CEPAL.
Bowen, R., y Morris, W. (2019). The digital divide: Implications for agribusiness and entrepreneurship. Lessons from Wales. Journal of Rural Studies, 72, 75-84.
Carattoli, M. C. (2020). El rol de los vínculos interpersonales en los procesos de vinculación Universidad-Industria. El caso de la UNCPBA. (Tesis de doctorado no publicada). Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires.
CEPAL., FAO., e IICA. (2021). Perspectivas de la Agricultura y del Desarrollo Rural en las Américas: una mirada hacia América Latina y el Caribe 2021-2022. – San José, C.R.: IICA, 2021.132 p.
Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1-14.
Cooney, T. M. (2012). Entrepreneurship skills for growth-orientated businesses. In Report for the Workshop on ‘Skills Development for SMEs and Entrepreneurship (Vol. 28).
Davidsson, P. (1991). Continued entrepreneurship: Ability, need, and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth. Journal of business venturing, 6(6), 405-429.
Erbes, Gutman, Lavallero y Robert. (2019). Industria 4.0: oportunidades y desafíos para el desarrollo productivo de la provincia de Santa Fe. Documentos de Proyectos (LC/TS.2019/80), Santiago, Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
Galindo, M. Á., y Méndez, M. T. (2014). Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: Are feedback effects at work? Journal of business research, 67(5), 825-829.
Garzón, M., y Rosetti, V. (2021). Mapeo Ecosistema AgTech en la Provincia de Córdoba. IERAL - Fundación Mediterránea.
Goetz, S. J., y Freshwater, D. (2001). State-level determinants of entrepreneurship and a preliminary measure of entrepreneurial climate. Economic Development Quarterly, 15(1), 58-70.
Hodgkinson, G. P. (2001). The Psychology of Strategic Management: Diversity and Cognition Revisited. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 16, 65–119
Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos (s.f). Series por sector de actividad económica: valor bruto de producción y valor agregado bruto. Años 2004-2021, por trimestres. Recuperado de: https://www.indec.gob.ar/indec/web/Nivel4-Tema-3-9-47
Isenberg, D. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review.
Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs, 1(781), 1-13.
Isenberg, D. J. (2016). Applying the ecosystem metaphor to entrepreneurship: Uses and abuses. The Antitrust Bulletin, 61(4), 564-573.
Isherwood, D. y Coetzee, M. (2011). Enhancing digital business ecosystem trust and reputation with centrality measures. Information Security South Africa (ISSA), 1-8.
Kirzner, I. M. (2009). The alert and creative entrepreneur: A clarification. Small Business Economics, 32(2), 145-152.
Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., y Labarthe, P. (2019). A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90, 100315.
Lachman, J., Lopez, A., Tinghitella, G., y Gomez-Roca, S. (2021). Las Agtech en Argentina. Desarrollo reciente, situación actual y perspectiva. Serie documentos de trabajo del IIEP N°57.
Mikhailov, A., Oliveira, C., Padula, A. D., y Reichert, F. M. (2021). Californian innovation ecosystem: emergence of agtechs and the new wave of agriculture. Innovation & Management Review.
Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., y Schindehutte, M. (2001). Towards integration: understanding entrepreneurship through frameworks. The international journal of entrepreneurship and innovation, 2(1), 35-49.
Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., Schindehutte, M., y Spivack, A. J. (2012). Framing the entrepreneurial experience. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 36(1), 11-40.
Navarro, A. I., Soler, M. J., Avalle, P. S., Villaggi, A., Cerrano, V. A., y Moine, V. L. (2019). Análisis, diagnóstico y recomendaciones para la aceleración del ecosistema AgTech en rosario y su región. Consejo Federal de Inversiones de Santa Fe. Informe final. Recuperado de: https://www.austral.edu.ar/cienciasempresariales/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Documento-fase-II.pdf
Observatorio de Empleo y Dinámica Empresarial (s.f.). Caracterización y evolución del empleo registrado. Serie anual. Recuperado de: https://www.trabajo.gob.ar/estadisticas/oede/estadisticasnacionales.asp
Oliveros, J. (2019). Entrepreneurial drivers of AgTech in the Philipines. Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada. Recuperado de: https://apfcanada-msme.ca/research/entrepreneurial-drivers-agtech-philippines.
Peltoniemi, M. y Vuori, E. (2004). Business ecosystem as the new approach to complex adaptive business environments. Proceedings of eBusiness Research Forum, Tampere.
Pigford, A. A. E., Hickey, G. M., y Klerkx, L. (2018). Beyond agricultural innovation systems? Exploring an agricultural innovation ecosystems approach for niche design and development in sustainability transitions. Agricultural systems, 164, 116-121.
Pilinkienė, V., y Mačiulis, P. (2014). Comparison of different ecosystem analogies: The main economic determinants and levels of impact. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 156, 365-370.
Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Currency.
Trigo, E., Diez, M. C. F., Mendez, J. C., y Demichelis, F. (2018). La revolución Agrotech en Argentina: Financiamiento, oportunidades y desafíos. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
Van de Ven, H. (1993). The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business venturing, 8(3), 211-230.
Vitón, R., García-Plata, G., Soares, Y., Castillo, A., y Soto-Marió, A. (2017). AgroTech: Innovaciones que no sabías que eran de América Latina y el Caribe. Publicaciones del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
Vitón, R. (2019). Innovación Agrotech en América Central y el Caribe: Oportunidades y desafíos frente al cambio climático. Publicaciones del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
Wessner, C. W. (2007). Innovation policies for the 21st century. Report of a symposium. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press.
Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., y Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small business economics, 24(3), 335-350.
Ziegler, S., Arias Segura, J., Bosio, M., y Kamacho, K. (2020). Conectividad rural en América Latina y el Caribe: un puente al desarrollo sostenible en tiempos de pandemia (en línea). IICA. San José, Costa Rica, 119 p. Recuperado de: https://repositorio.iica.int/handle/11324/12896
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
