An Aspect of Hybrid Governance in Small-Scale Digital Multi-sided Platforms

Authors

  • José Luis Pellegrini Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Estadística, Universidad Nacional de Rosario
  • Paula Julieta Báscolo Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Estadística, Universidad Nacional de Rosario
  • Romina Puccio Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Estadística, Universidad Nacional de Rosario
  • María Victoria Massón Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Estadística, Universidad Nacional de Rosario.
  • Mauro Ferrero Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Estadística, Universidad Nacional de Rosario

Keywords:

Digital Multi-sided Platform, Small Business, Rosario City, Argentina, Transaction Costs Economic, Governance

Abstract

This paper analyzes, with a Transaction Costs Economics based view, how small-scale digital multi-sided platforms (DMSPs) affiliate part of their users by making transaction-specific investments and creating hybrid governance structures (that is, combining characteristics of hierarchical and market governance). This is a behavior different from that analyzed by the main authors who deal with DMSPs from the point of view of economic theory, who do not deal with the phenomenon of affiliation or understand that the investments associated with it are made by the users of the platform only. Previously, we review the main contributions of what can be considered the mainstream of economic theory that deals with LDCs and some recent contributions, influenced by the economics of Transaction Costs. The behavior described above is observed in the results of a multi-case study of small-scale PMD based in the city of Rosario, Argentina.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two‐sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668-691.

Arrow, K. J. (1974). The Limits of Organization. W. W. Norton.

Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99–120.

Barney, J. B. (1999). How a Firm’s Capabilities Affect Boundary Decisions. Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 137-145.

Barney, J.B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27, 643 - 650.

Caillaud, B., & Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. The RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 309-328.

Cenmano, C., & Visnjic, I. (2013). The Gang of Four. Acquaintances, Friends or Foes? Towards an Integrated Perspective on Platform Competition. 35th DRUID Celebration Conference 2013, 17-19.

Cusumano, M. A., Gawer, A., & Yoffie, D. B. (2019). The Business of Platforms: Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power. Harper Business.

Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.

European Commission. (s. f.). Online Platforms. Shaping Europe’s digital future. Recuperado 19 de abril de 2021, de https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/online-platforms

Evans, D. S. (2003). The Antitrust Economics of Multi-Sided Platform Markets. Yale Journal on Regulatiion, 20, 325.

Evans, D.S., & Schmalensee, R. (2005). The Industrial Organization of Markets with Two-Sided Platforms (Working Paper N.o 11603). National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w11603

Evans, D.S., & Schmalensee, R. (2014). The Antitrust Analysis of Multi-Sided Platform Businesses. En R. Blair & D. Sokol, Oxford Handbook on International Antitrust Economics (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.

Evans, D.S., & Schmalensee, R. (2016). Matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

Evans, D.S., & Schmalensee, R. (2018). Applying the Rule of Reason to Two-Sided Platform Businesses. U. Miami Bus. L. Rev.1, 26, 1.

Gawer, A. (2021). Digital platforms’ boundaries: The interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long Range Planning, 54(5), 102045.

Gibbons, R., & Roberts, J. (2013a). Economic Theories of Incentives in Organizations. En R. Gibbons & J. Roberts (Eds.), The Handbook of Organizational Economics (pp. 56-99). Princeton University Press.

Gibbons, R., & Roberts, J. (2013b). Introduction. En R. Gibbons & J. Roberts (Eds.), The Handbook of Organizational Economics (pp. 1-8). Princeton University Press.

Hagiu, A. (2006). Pricing and commitment by two‐sided platforms. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 720-737.

Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2015). Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 43, 162-174.

Loux, P., Aubry, M., Tran, S., & Baudoin, E. (2020). Multi-sided platforms in B2B contexts: The role of affiliation costs and interdependencies in adoption decisions. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 212-223.

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press.

Nooteboom, B. (1993). Firm Size Effects on Transaction Costs. Small Business Economics, 5(4), 283-295.

Penrose, E. T. (1962). Teoría del crecimiento de la empresa. Aguilar.

Poniatowski, M., Lüttenberg, H., Beverungen, D., & Kundisch, D. (2021). Three layers of abstraction: A conceptual framework for theorizing digital multi-sided platforms. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 1-27.

Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029.

Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2004). Two-Sided Markets: An Overview [Working Paper]. Institut d’Economie Industrielle. https://web.mit.edu/14.271/www/rochet_tirole.pdf

Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two‐sided markets: A progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645-667.

Smith, A. (1956). Una investigación sobre la naturaleza y causa de la riqueza de las naciones (Madrid). Aguilar.

Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform Capitalism. Polity Press.

Staykova, K. S., & Damsgaard, J. (2015). A typology of multi-sided platforms: The core and the periphery. En J. Becker, J. vom Brocke, & M. De Marco (Eds.), ECIS 2015 Proceedings (Vol. 174). Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).

Teece, D. J. (2019). A capability theory of the firm: An economics and (Strategic) management perspective. New Zealand Economic Papers, 53(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2017.1371208

Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 509–533

Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167-186.

Tiwana, A. (2014). Platform ecosystems: aligning architecture, governance and strategy. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-12-408066-9

Williamson, O. E. (1989). Las instituciones económicas del capitalismo. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Published

2022-03-04

How to Cite

Pellegrini, J. L. ., Báscolo, P. J. ., Puccio, R. ., Massón, M. V. ., & Ferrero, M. . (2022). An Aspect of Hybrid Governance in Small-Scale Digital Multi-sided Platforms. Pymes, Innovación Y Desarrollo, 9(3), 60–79. Retrieved from https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pid/article/view/36890