Cervical cerclage as treatment for functional incompetence. Descriptive cross-sectional study at public maternity hospital in Cordoba

Authors

  • Lucia del Valle Ribero Dra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31052/1853.1180.v28.n2.34853

Keywords:

Cervical incompetence, Cervical cerclage

Abstract

Objective: Describe the experience in cervical cerclages and obstetric results in pregnant women with diagnosis of cervical incompetence.

Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study on the experience with pregnant women with diagnosis of cervical incompetence who underwent cervical cerclage during gestation and were assisted in public maternity hospital in the City of Cordoba.

Results: The study included 82 cerclages. McDonald’s technique was used.  Average gestational age was 15 weeks. Of all the cases, 84.5 % were multigestations: 14.6% had late miscarriages, 11% premature deliveries and another 11% late miscarriage and premature delivery.  According to the gestational age when cerclage was placed, 53 of them were prophylactic.  Only 12 presented early complication: 9 preterm membrane ruptures and 3 cervical tears.

Conclusion: The effect of cervical cerclage as intervention is important but it is not the solution for pre-term delivery.  Cervical cerclage is a simple technique with high success rate, low complications rate and good perinatal results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2014. [Internet]. Practice Bulletin No.142: Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol.123(2 Pt 1):372-9. Disponible en: https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Citation/2014/02000/Practice_Bulletin_No__142__Cerclage_for_the.33.aspx

Instituto Mexicano de Seguro Social IM. Indicaciones y manejo del cerclaje cervical [Internet]. 2011. Disponible en: https://www.imss.gob.mx/sites/all/statics/guiasclinicas/539GER.pdf

Fuchs F, Deffieux X, Senat M-V, Gervaise A, Faivre E, Frydman R, et al. Técnicas quirúrgicas de cerclaje del cuello uterino. EMC - Ginecol-Obstet [Internet]. 2010;46(4):1–12. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1283-081x(10)70764-5

Murillo C, Cobo T, Ferrero S, Ponce J, Palacio M. Cerclaje uterino [Internet]. medicinafetalbarcelona.org. 2018 [citado el 2 de marzo de 2022]. Disponible en: https://medicinafetalbarcelona.org/protocolos/es/patologia-materna-obstetrica/cerclaje%20hcp_hsjd.pdf

Brown R, Gagnon R, Delisle M-F, MATERNAL FETAL MEDICINE COMMITTEE. Cervical insufficiency and cervical cerclage. J Obstet Gynaecol Can [Internet]. 2013;35(12):1115–27. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30764-7

Cervical cerclage (Green-top Guideline No. 60) [Internet]. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. [citado el 2 de marzo de 2022]. Disponible en: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg60/

Cerclaje de urgencia: experiencia institucional. Instituto Nacional de Perinatología [Internet]. el 25 de agosto de 2001;15 No. 3(JULIO-SEPTIEMBRE 2001):188–94. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/inper/ip-2001/ip013e.pdf

Lattus J, Catalán A, Paredes A, Hidalgo M et al. CERCLAJE CERVICAL TRANSVAGINAL DE RESCATE CON TÉCNICA DE MCDONALD, EXPERIENCIA EN HOSPITAL SANTIAGO ORIENTE EN 11 AÑOS, (2002-2013). XXXIV Congreso Chileno de Obstetricia y Ginecología [Internet]. 2013;1:48. Disponible en: http://sochog.cl/wp-content/uploads/libros_de_contribuciones/2013.pdf

Roman AS, Saltzman DH, Fox N, Klauser CK, Istwan N, Rhea D, et al. Prophylactic cerclage in the management of twin pregnancies. Am J Perinatol [Internet]. 2013;30(9):751–4. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1332796

Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: preliminary data from 2007. Natl Vital StatRep. 2007;57:1–23.

Rh F, Mucio D, Martínez B, Díaz Rossello G, Durán JL, Serruya P, et al. SISTEMA INFORMATICO PERINATAL HISTORIA CLINICA PERINATAL y Formularios Complementarios Instrucciones de llenado y definición de términos [Internet]. Paho.org. [citado el 22 de marzo de 2022]. Disponible en: https://www.paho.org/clap/dmdocuments/CLAP1584.pdf

Cunningham FG, Leveno JK, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Williams Obstetricia. 23va Edición. Distrito Federal, México: McGraw Hill Higher Education; 2011.

Pérez Sanchez A, Donoso Siña E. Obstetricia, 4ta Edición. Mediterránea; 2011.

Mercer BM. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2003;101(1):178–93. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02366-9

ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 80: premature rupture of membranes. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2007;109(4):1007–19. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000263888.69178.1f

Sospecha de corioamnionitis y corioamnionitis clínica [Internet]. Unitat de Prematuritat. Servei de Medicina Maternofetal. Institut Clínic de Ginecologia, Obstetrícia i Neonatologia. Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. 2012 [citado el 22 de marzo de 2022]. Disponible en: https://medicinafetalbarcelona.org/protocolos/es/patologia-materna-obstetrica/corioamnionitis.html

Protocolo de Atención del Recién Nacido de Bajo Riesgo, Parte 5 [Internet]. Disponible en: https://www.paho.org/nic/index.php?option=com_docman

Hospital Materno Neonatal Ministro Dr Ramon Carrillo. Departamento de Tocoginecología Clínica. Pauta N°01. Amenaza de Parto Prematuro. 2016.

Corradi L, Piscitelli L. Actualización 2019 Pauta Amenaza de Parto Prematuro, Departamento de Tocoginecología Clínica. 2019.

Szmulewicz C, Neveu M-E, Vigoureux S, Fernandez H, Capmas P. Emergency vaginal cervico-isthmic cerclage. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2019;48(6):391–4. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.03.023

Hezelgrave NL, Watson HA, Ridout A, Diab F, Seed PT, Chin-Smith E, et al. Rationale and design of SuPPoRT: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to compare three treatments: cervical cerclage, cervical pessary and vaginal progesterone, for the prevention of preterm birth in women who develop a short cervix. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2016;16(1):358. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1148-9

Ferrero S, Cobo T, Murillo C, Palacio M. Manejo de la paciente con riesgo de parto pretérmino. Hospital Clínic. Hospital Sant Joan de Déu. Universitat de Barcelona [Internet]. medicinafetalbarcelona.org. 2019. Disponible en: https://medicinafetalbarcelona.org/protocolos/es/patologia-materna-obstetrica/cerclaje%20hcp_hsjd.pdf

Saccone G, Maruotti GM, Giudicepietro A, Martinelli P, Italian Preterm Birth Prevention (IPP) Working Group. Effect of cervical pessary on spontaneous preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies and short cervical length: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA [Internet]. 2017;318(23):2317–24. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.18956

Berghella V, Ciardulli A, Rust OA, To M, Otsuki K, Althuisius S, et al. Cerclage for sonographic short cervix in singleton gestations without prior spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2017;50(5):569–77. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.17457

Gluck O, Mizrachi Y, Ginath S, Bar J, Sagiv R. Obstetrical outcomes of emergency compared with elective cervical cerclage. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2017;30(14):1650–4. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2016.1220529

Bayrak M, Gul A, Goynumer G. Rescue cerclage when foetal membranes prolapse into the vagina. J Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2017;37(4):471–5. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2016.1268574

Premkumar A, Sinha N, Miller ES, Peaceman AM. Perioperative use of cefazolin and indomethacin for physical examination-indicated cerclages to improve gestational latency. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2020;135(6):1409–16. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003874

Vasudeva N, Reddington C, Bogdanska M, De Luca L. Emergency versus elective cervical cerclage: An audit of our first two years of service. Biomed Res Int [Internet]. 2018;2018:2065232. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2065232

Diamant H, Mastrolia SA, Weintraub AY, Sheizaf B, Zilberstein T, Yohay D. Effectiveness and safety of late midtrimester cervical cerclage. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2019;32(18):3007–11. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1454426

McManemy J, Cooke E, Amon E, Leet T. Recurrence risk for preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2007;196(6):576.e1-6; discussion 576.e6-7. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.01.039

Berghella V, Rafael TJ, Szychowski JM, Rust OA, Owen J. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography in women with singleton gestations and previous preterm birth: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2011;117(3):663–71. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820ca847

Olatunbosun OA, Dyck F. Cervical cerclage operation for a dilated cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;57(2):166–70. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7465119/

Published

2023-01-05

Issue

Section

Scientific Articles

How to Cite

1.
Cervical cerclage as treatment for functional incompetence. Descriptive cross-sectional study at public maternity hospital in Cordoba. Rev. Salud Pública (Córdoba) [Internet]. 2023 Jan. 5 [cited 2024 Dec. 19];28(2). Available from: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RSD/article/view/34853